Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1

Examination of the stresses of the implants applied to the atrophic edentulous maxilla on the maxillary bone

Pages
210–215
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: As a result of our study, it was seen that zygomatic and dental implants applied in addition to the zygomatic implant reduce stress, and the localization of dental implants affects the stress values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In advanced atrophy of the posterior maxilla, applied zygoma implants increase the success of the surgical procedure by reducing morbidity and procedure time.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of our study was to choose the most accurate surgical planning according to the stresses arising from the applied forces.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: As a result of our study, it was seen that zygomatic and dental implants applied in addition to the zygomatic implant reduce stress, and the localization of dental implants affects the stress values.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In advanced atrophy of the posterior maxilla, applied zygoma implants increase the success of the surgical procedure by reducing morbidity and procedure time. In our study, using tomographic records, a model with posterior atrophy was obtained in a computer environment, and zygomatic and dental implants in different numbers and localizations were applied to this model. The aim of our study was to choose the most accurate surgical planning according to the stresses arising from the applied forces. Methodology: In our study, one zygoma implant on the right and left in Group 1, two zygoma implants in Group 2, one zygoma implant in Group 3 and one dental implant in the first premolar tooth area, one zygoma implant in Group 4, and one dental implant in the lateral tooth area and one zygoma implant in Group 5 and one dental implant in the lateral and a first premolar tooth area were applied. 150 N were applied vertically to the prosthetic superstructure from the lateral tooth, 1st premolar tooth, 1st molar tooth, and 2nd molar tooth. As a result of the applied forces, the maximum stress values in the maxilla molar region were examined by finite element stress analysis. Results: In our study, it was observed that Group 1 had the highest stress value, followed by Group 3. Stress values in Groups 2, 4, and 5 were low, and they were measured close to each other. Conclusion: As a result of our study, it was seen that zygomatic and dental implants applied in addition to the zygomatic implant reduce stress, and the localization of dental implants affects the stress values.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLSÜN, B., ÇETİNDAĞ, A. (2022). Examination of the stresses of the implants applied to the atrophic edentulous maxilla on the maxillary bone. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1, 210–215. https://ajindex.com/articles/539500

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Brodala N. Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2009;24:118–25
  2. Atalay B. İleri Derecede Rezorbe Maksillaların Zigomatik Implantlarla Rehabilitasyonu. İstanbul Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Derg. 2010;44(2):133–40
  3. Gongloff R, Cole M, Whitlow W, Boyne P. Titanium mesh and particulate cancellous bone and marrow grafts to augment the maxillary alveolar ridge. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15(7):263–8. (Crossref
  4. Isaksson S, Ekfeldt A, Alberius P, Blomqvist J. Early results from reconstruction of severely atrophic (Class VI) maxillas by immediate endosseous implants in conjunction with bone grafting and Le Fort I osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;22:144–8. (Crossref
  5. Weischer T, Schettler D, Mohr C. Titanium implants in the zygoma as retaining elements after hemimaxillectomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 1997;12:211–4
  6. Aparicio C, Branemark P, Keller E, Olive J. Reconstruction of the premaxilla with autogenous iliac bone in combination with autogenous iliac bone in combination with osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 1993;8:61–7
  7. Vrielinck L, Politis C, Schepers S, Pauwels M, Naert I. Imagebased planning and clinical validation of the zygoma and pterygoid implant placement in patients with severe bone atrophy using customized drill guides. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:7–14. (Crossref
  8. Stevenson A, Austin B. Zygomaticus fixtures: the Sidney experience. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 2000;15:337–9
  9. Bedrossian E, Stumpel LI. Immediate stabilization at stage II of zygomatic implants: rationale and technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;86:10–4. (Crossref
  10. Boyes-Varley J, Howes D, Lownie J, Blackbeard G. Surgical modifications to the Branemark zygomaticus protocol in the treatment of the severely resorbed maxilla: a clinical report. J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2003;18:232–7
  11. Tamura H, Sasaki K, Watahiki R. Primary insertion of implants in the zygomatic bone following subtotal maxillectomy. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2000;41:21–4. (Crossref
  12. Meijer H, Kuiper J, Starmans F, Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68(1):96–102. (Crossref
  13. Daas M, Dubois G, Bonnet A, Lipinski P, Rignon-Bret C. A complete finite element model of a mandibular implantretained overdenture