SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1

Effects of removable dental prostheses on mandibular bone density in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients

Belgin GÜLSÜN
Sinan ATEŞ
Pages
206–209
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The fact that removable mandibular prostheses did not cause a significant change in mandibular bone density could be because the patients started using the removable prostheses long after they lost their teeth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this sudy is to investigate the effects of removable dental prostheses on mandibular bone density in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methodology: The prospective study included 30 female patients aged 45–70 years who had been previously diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The fact that removable mandibular prostheses did not cause a significant change in mandibular bone density could be because the patients started using the removable prostheses long after they lost their teeth.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this sudy is to investigate the effects of removable dental prostheses on mandibular bone density in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. Methodology: The prospective study included 30 female patients aged 45–70 years who had been previously diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The patients had no diseases affecting bone metabolism. The patients were divided into two groups: (i) patients who were using removable dental prostheses (n=15) and (ii) patients who were not using removable dental prostheses (n=15) (the control group). A whole-body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan was performed to calculate the mandibular bone densities of the patients. Results: The use of removable mandibular prostheses did not cause a significant change in mandibular bone density. Conclusion: The fact that removable mandibular prostheses did not cause a significant change in mandibular bone density could be because the patients started using the removable prostheses long after they lost their teeth.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLSÜN, B., ATEŞ, S. (2022). Effects of removable dental prostheses on mandibular bone density in postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1, 206–209. https://ajindex.com/articles/539494

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Arasıl T. Osteoporoz. Osteoporoz Konseyi. 2002: 5-6 2. Seeman E, Martin TJ. Non-invasive techniques for the measurement of bone mineral. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989 May
  2. 3(1):1-33. (Crossref) 3. Kent SJ, Mackie J, Macfarlane TV. Designing for safety: implications of a fifteen year review of swallowed and aspirated dentures. Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. 2016
  3. 7(2). (Crossref) 4. Campbell SD, Cooper L, Craddock H, Hyde TP, Nattress B, Pavitt SH, Seymour DW. Removable partial dentures: the clinical need for innovation. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2017
  4. 118(3):273-280. (Crossref) 5. Seeman E, Martin TJ. Non-invasive techniques for the measurement of bone mineral. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989 May
  5. 3(1):1-33. (Crossref) 6. Cakur B, Dagistan S, Sahin A, Harorli A, Yilmaz A. Reliability of mandibular cortical index and mandibular bone mineral density in the detection of osteoporotic women. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009
  6. 255–61. (Crossref) 7. Blake GM, Fogelman I. The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Postgraduate medical journal. 2007
  7. 83(982):509-517. (Crossref) 8. Nakamoto T, Taguchi A, Ohtsuka M, Suei Y, Fujita M. Dental panoramic radiograph as a tool to detect postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: untrained general dental practitioners diagnostic performance. Osteoporosis international. 2003
  8. 14(8):659-64. (Crossref) 9. Yeler DY. Bone quality and quantity measurement techniques in dentistry. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal2016
  9. 19(1):73-86. 10. Almasoud NN, Tanneru N, Marei HF. Alveolar bone density and its clinical implication in the placement of dental implants and orthodontic mini-implants. Saudi medical journal. 2016
  10. 37(6): 684. (Crossref) 11. Sözen T, Özışık L, Başaran NÇ. An overview and management of osteoporosis. European journal of rheumatology. 2017
  11. 4(1):46. (Crossref) 12. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. Evidence for two distinct syndromes of involutional osteoporosis. Am J Med. 1983
  12. (Crossref) 13. Türkiye Endokrinoloji ve Metabolizma Derneği. Osteoporoz ve Metabolik Kemik Hastalıkları Tanı ve Tedavi Kılavuzu. 11. Baskı. Ankara, 2016
  13. Scheiber II LB, Torregrosa L. Evaluation and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. In Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism. 1998
  14. 27(4):245-261. (Crossref) 15. Knezović-Zlatarić D, Čelebić A. Mandibular bone mineral density changes in complete and removable partial denture wearers: a 6-month follow-up