Journals / International Dental Research / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Investigation of microleakage of polymerized withLED and halogen light devices four differentrestorative materials

Pages
73–79
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The microleakage scores were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis and MannWhitney U-tests.Results: According to the results of the statistical analysis, in polymerization made with halogen and LED light devices at the occlusal edge, the microleakage scores from lowest to highest were as follows: Filtek™ Silorane < Herculite® XRV Ultra™ < Æliteflo™ < Vertise™ Flow.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effects on microleakage of LED and halogen light devices used in the polymerization of monomer structure composite resins of different viscosities and inorganic filling particle size applied to standard class V cavities in primary teeth.Methodology: 80 non caries primary molar teeth with standard class v cavity on the buccal surfaces were used.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The teeth were randomly divided into 4 main groups and restored with composite resins (Herculite® XRV, Ultra™, Filtek™ Silorane, Vertise™ Flow, Æliteflo™).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The microleakage scores were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis and MannWhitney U-tests.Results: According to the results of the statistical analysis, in polymerization made with halogen and LED light devices at the occlusal edge, the microleakage scores from lowest to highest were as follows: Filtek™ Silorane < Herculite® XRV Ultra™ < Æliteflo™ < Vertise™ Flow.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro effects on microleakage of LED and halogen light devices used in the polymerization of monomer structure composite resins of different viscosities and inorganic filling particle size applied to standard class V cavities in primary teeth.Methodology: 80 non caries primary molar teeth with standard class v cavity on the buccal surfaces were used. The teeth were randomly divided into 4 main groups and restored with composite resins (Herculite® XRV, Ultra™, Filtek™ Silorane, Vertise™ Flow, Æliteflo™). Each group was divided into 2 sub-groups for polymerization with LED or halogen light devices. Following the thermal cycle and subsequent procedures, the dye penetration method was used to evaluate microleakage. The microleakage scores were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis and MannWhitney U-tests.Results: According to the results of the statistical analysis, in polymerization made with halogen and LED light devices at the occlusal edge, the microleakage scores from lowest to highest were as follows: Filtek™ Silorane < Herculite® XRV Ultra™ < Æliteflo™ < Vertise™ Flow. In polymerization made with halogen and LED light devices at the gingival edge, the microleakage scores from lowest to highest were as follows: Filtek™ Silorane < Herculite® XRV Ultr™ < Vertise™ Flow < Æliteflo™.Conclusion: In the polymerizations made by using LED and halogen light devices, Herculite® XRV Ultra™, was found to be successful as it showed similar values to Filtek™ Silorane, which gave the best results in terms of microleakage. Moreover, as we have reached similar findings in our thesis study in respect of microleakage, in cases indicating the use of flow composite resin materials such as Æliteflo™, Vertise™ Flow can be used as it has the advantage of ease application and thus provide an ideal alternative in pediatric dentistry.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNAY, A., TÜMEN, E. C. (2022). Investigation of microleakage of polymerized withLED and halogen light devices four differentrestorative materials. International Dental Research, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 73–79. https://ajindex.com/articles/539306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: a review. Operative Dentistry 1997;22(4):173-85
  2. Dayangaç GB. Kompozit Restorasyonlar, 2. Basım, İstanbul, 2011, Quintessence Yayıncılık, 1-82
  3. Ozturk AN, Usumez A, Ozturk B, Usumez S. Influence of different light sources on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:500-504
  4. Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dental Materials 2005;21:1150-1157. (Crossref
  5. Silveira de Araújo C, Incerti da Silva T, Ogliari FA, Meireles SS, Piva E, Demarco FF. Microleakage of seven adhesive systems in enamel and dentin. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2006;7(5):26-33. (Crossref
  6. Özok AR, De Gee AJ, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The influence of resin composite and bonded amalgam restorations on dentine permeability in class II cavities in vitro. Dental Materials 2001;17:477-484. (Crossref
  7. Cavalcante LM, Peris AR, Ambrosano GM, Ritter AV, Pimenta LA. Effect of photoactivation systems and resin composites on the microleakage of esthetic restorations. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 2007;8(2):70-79. (Crossref
  8. Dos Santos RA, Lima AF, Soares GP, Ambrosano GMB, Marchi GM, Lovadino JR, Aguiar FHB. Effect of preheating resin composite and light-curing units on the microleakage of class II restorations submitted to thermocycling. Operative Dentistry 2011;36(1):60-65. (Crossref
  9. Bektas OO, Eren D, Akın GG, Sağ BU, Ozcan M. Microleakage effect on class V composite restorations with two adhesive systems using different bleaching methods. Acta Odontol Scand 2013;71(3-4):1-8. (Crossref
  10. Rueggeberg FA. State-of-the-art: dental photocuring-a review. Dental Materials 2011:27(1):39-52. (Crossref
  11. Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dental Materials 2005;21:68-74. (Crossref
  12. Poureslami HR, Sajadi F, Sharifi M, Ebrahimi SF. Marginal microleakage of low-shrinkage composite silorane in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects 2012;6(3):94-97
  13. Krifka S, Federlin M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Microleakage of silorane-and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations. Clinical Oral Investigations 2012;16(4):1117-1124. (Crossref
  14. Hooshmand T, Tabari N, Keshvad A. Marginal leakage and microhardness evaluation of low-shrinkage resin-based restorative materials. General Dentistry 201