Journals / Infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

Bacterial Contamination of Cellular Phones:Are Mobile Phones Safer than Smart Phones?

Pages
147–152
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We could not show any HAI occurred by the bacteria isolated fromcell phones, but health care workers should pay attention to this issue.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to describe pathogenic contamination on healthcare workers’ cellularphones, detect factors associated with contamination, and demonstrate whether there wasa link between cell phone contamination and subsequent healthcare-associated infections.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study was conducted in a 2000-bed tertiary care university hospital in Ankara.A total of 631 healthcare workers (HCWs) from several departments willing to participatewere included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We could not show any HAI occurred by the bacteria isolated fromcell phones, but health care workers should pay attention to this issue.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to describe pathogenic contamination on healthcare workers’ cellularphones, detect factors associated with contamination, and demonstrate whether there wasa link between cell phone contamination and subsequent healthcare-associated infections. Methods: The study was conducted in a 2000-bed tertiary care university hospital in Ankara.A total of 631 healthcare workers (HCWs) from several departments willing to participatewere included in the study. Bacterial cultures were taken from each cell phone via rotatinga sterile swab moistened with sterile physiological saline solution over both sides of thephone surface and cover. Samples were taken to the bacteriology laboratory within onehour and streaked onto 5% sheep blood agar. Isolated microorganisms were identified withconventional methods.Results: All 631 cell phones investigated had positive cultures; forty-four (6.05%) werepathogenic microorganisms. Drug resistance was not detected among pathogenic bacteria.As determined by univariate analysis, using flip phone cover (P = 0.022), a professionalexperience of fewer than five years (P = 0.049), having cleaned the phone within the last 48hours (P = 0.030), and working in a medical ward (P = 0.022) were significantly associatedwith pathogen contamination on the devices. Multivariate analysis with logistic regressionrevealed that using flip cover is the only factor associated with pathogen contamination oncell phones (P=0.035). Pathogen contamination on smartphones (7.7%) seemed to be higherthan on mobile phones (5.2%) (P=0.263).Conclusion: Pathogen contamination on smartphones was higher than on mobile phonesbut did not reach statistical significance. Using flip cover covers on cellular phones increasescontamination rates. We could not show any HAI occurred by the bacteria isolated fromcell phones, but health care workers should pay attention to this issue.

🔖

Cite This Article

AZAP, A., ÖZKAYA, D., AYHAN, S. B., YAZAR, Ç., NAHYA, Ö., KILIÇDAĞI, P. (2022). Bacterial Contamination of Cellular Phones:Are Mobile Phones Safer than Smart Phones?. Infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (Online), Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 147–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/539119

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. 1 World Health Organization. The burden of health care-associated infection worldwide. Available from: URL: https://www. who.int/gpsc/country_work/burden_hcai/en/ 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Available from: URL: https://www.cdc. gov/winnablebattles/report/HAIs.html 3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Types of healthcare-associated infections. Available from: URL: https:// www.cdc.gov/hai/infectiontypes.html#:~:text=Infections%20 can%20be%20associated%20with,%2C%20and%20ventilator%2Dassociated%20pneumonia 4 Qureshi NQ, Mufarrih SH, Irfan S, Rashid RH, Zubairi AJ, Sadruddin A, et al. Mobile phones in the orthopedic operating room: microbial colonization and antimicrobial resistance. World J Orthop 2020
  2. 5 Cavari Y, Kaplan O, Zander A, Hazan G, Shemer-Avni Y, Borer A. Healthcare workers mobile phone usage: a potential risk for viral contamination. Surveillance pilot study. Infect Dis (Lond) 2016
  3. 6 Brady RRW, Wasson A, Stirling I, McAllister C, Damani NN. Is your phone bugged? The incidence of bacteria known to cause nosocomial infection on healthcare workers' mobile phones. J Hosp Infect 2006
  4. 7 Martina PF, Martinez M, Centeno CK, M VONS, Ferreras J. Dangerous passengers: multidrug-resistant bacteria on hands and mobile phones. J Prev Med Hyg 2019
  5. E293-E299. 8 Ulger F, Esen S, Dilek A, Yanik K, Gunaydin M, Leblebicioglu H. Are we aware how contaminated our mobile phones with nosocomial pathogens? Ann Clin Microb Anti 2009
  6. 9 Suganya S, Sumathy JHV. Isolation and identification of bacteria from covered and uncovered mobile phones. Int J Environ Sci 2012
  7. 10 Sadat-Ali M, Al-Omran AK, Azam Q, Bukari H, Al-Zahrani AJ, Al-Turki RA, et al. Bacterial flora on cell phones of health care providers in a teaching institution. Am J Infect Control 2010
  8. 11 Singh S, Acharya S, Bhat M, Rao SK, Pentapati KC. Mobile phone hygiene: potential risks posed by use in the clinics of an Indian dental school. J Dent Educ 2010
  9. 12 Kilic IH, Ozaslan M, Karagoz ID, Zer Y, Davutoglu V. The microbial colonisation of mobile phone used by healthcare staffs. Pak J Biol Sci 2009
  10. 13 Ustun C, Cihangiroglu M. Health care workers' mobile phones: a potential cause of microbial cross-contamination between hospitals and community. J Occup Environ Hyg 2012
  11. 14 Lee YJ, Yoo CG, Lee CT, Chung HS, Kim YW, Han SK, et al. Contamin