Journals / ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Traces of The Past Utopias in Contemporary Architecture: Parasitic Architecture

Pages
170–195
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this sense, the article reveals that utopias are shaping both the human life and the future of architecture, and thus the traces of thepast utopias can be encountered today.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Utopia, a phenomenon shaped in the frame of criticism, can be describedas a proposal representing hope for the future.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Architecture, which is acritical practice, creates new grounds for debate in the discipline withutopia designs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this sense, the article reveals that utopias are shaping both the human life and the future of architecture, and thus the traces of thepast utopias can be encountered today.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Utopia, a phenomenon shaped in the frame of criticism, can be describedas a proposal representing hope for the future. Architecture, which is acritical practice, creates new grounds for debate in the discipline withutopia designs. When utopian approaches of the past and contemporaryarchitectural products are examined, it can be observed that utopias canbe transformed into the facts of today. In this sense, this article aims toquestion whether contemporary approaches are inspired by the utopianpropositions of the past. It was tried to be comprehended the utopianexamples of parasitic architecture and the manifestations of currentlyproduced samples. Examples were criticized with the aid of the analysissheet prepared in the light of the specified parameters and thecontributions of the utopias to the embodiment process of the design inthe real world were questioned. In the context of parasitic architecture,it can be seen that approaches of both are similar. The accuracy of thethesis on that, no matter how much time passes over the utopian spatialproductions, they continue to be valid and embody in the case ofsufficient technology is debated. It is right to say that architecturecontinues to criticize, produce solutions for the current situations inevery period, and doing so, it benefits from the pioneering attitude ofutopias. In this sense, the article reveals that utopias are shaping both the human life and the future of architecture, and thus the traces of thepast utopias can be encountered today.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENSOY, G., ÜSTÜN, B. (2022). Traces of The Past Utopias in Contemporary Architecture: Parasitic Architecture. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 170–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/538331

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Akcan, E. (2011). Eleştirel Mimari Pratik ve Boğaçhan Dündaralp. Arredamento Mimarlık Dergisi. 3:111-112
  2. Benhabib, S. (2005).
  3. Eleştiri, Norm ve Ütopya, Eleştirel Teorinin Temellerine Dair Bir İnceleme. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları Brown, G. (2003). Freedom and Transience of Space (Technonomads and transformers). Robert Kronenburg (Ed.) Transportable Environments 2. London: Spon Yayıncılık. 3- 13 Chanéac, J-L. (1972). Cellules Polyvalentes (Multi-Functional Cells). in Justus Dahinden (Ed.). Urban Structures For the Future. New York: Praeger Publishers Coleman, N. (2011).
  4. Imagining and Making the World, Reconsidering Architecture and Utopia. Ralahine Utopian Studies: Volume 8. New York: Peter Lang Entwistle, J. (Ed.) et al. (2013). Post Modernism. Lighting Journal. 78(3):35 Erkmen, N. M. (2008). Toplumsal Değişim ve İletişim Eleştirisi Olarak Ütopya ve Karşı-Ütopya: Aldous Huxley’in Cesur Yeni Dünya Romanı Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Ege University. Unpublished Master Thesis. Izmir Hatuka, T., and D'Hooghe, A. (2007). After Postmodernism: Readdressing the Role of Utopia in Urban Design and Planning. Places. 19(2): 20-27
  5. Hauart, D. R. (2015). Space for New Visions. A10 New European Architecture. 65:10 Hausermann, P. (1962). Habitation à Grilly France. L’Architectured’Aujourd’hui Isozaki, A. (1962). Étude d’architecture Spatiale á Forte Concentration. L’Architecture d’Aujourd’hui Jameson, F. (2009). Ütopya Denen Arzu. Istanbul: Metis Yayınları Kachri, G. (2009). Parasite Ecologies: Extending Space Through Diffusion - Limited Aggregation Models. University College London. Bartlett School of Graduate Studies. Unpublished Master Thesis Lefebvre, H. (1995).
  6. Yaşamla Söyleşi, Sosyalizm, Günlük Yaşam, Ütopya. Istanbul: Belge Yayınları Senyücel, S. (Ed.) et al. (2011) Genç Mimar: Boğaçhan Dündaralp. Arredamento Mimarlık Dergisi. 3:117-131
  7. Sevinç, A. (2005). İkinci Dünya Savaşı Sonrası Mimarlık Hayalleri: Ütopya Eskizleri. Istanbul Technical University. Graduate School of Science. Doctoral Thesis. Istanbul Şensoy, G. (2016). Eleştiri Bağlamında Ütopya Önermeleri. Anadolu University. Graduate School of Science. Unpublished Master Thesis. Eskişehir Tan, P. (2011). Mimarlık Sosyolojisine Girişin Olanakları. Arredamento Mimarlık Dergisi. 3:112-116 URL-1 http://www.domusweb.it /en/architecture/2010/05/10/parasiticalarchitecture. html (18.03.2017) URL-2.http://www.frac-centre.fr/collection-artarchitecture/ chaneac/cellules-parasites- 64.html?authID=37&ensembleID=724 (23.12.2016) U