SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Design Studio / 2025 / Volume: 7 Issue: 2

Exploring Body’s Potentials in Everydayness of the City: Architectural Design Studio Experience

Gamze Şensoy Torun(ESKİŞEHİR TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4368-2649
Osman Tutal(ESKISEHIR TECHNICAL UNIVERSİTY)0000-0003-1454-5514
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, they had not yet developed an awareness of how material and environmental factors could affect the variability of space.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The designed space dictating a certain behavior is an element that triggers the body's desire to create its own experience.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, the body's resistance to form, its production of its own space, and the relations between designed and changing space were discussed in the 2nd-year Architectural Design Studio. 11 projects produced during the studio process were evaluated according to the formation of form, and four tendencies were observed: 'dissociation of form,' 'augmentation of form,' 'translocation of form,' and 'transformation of form.' These tendencies were discussed in terms of the learning outcomes of the studio which are concept-form relationship, spatial interaction and spatial responsiveness.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, they had not yet developed an awareness of how material and environmental factors could affect the variability of space.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Architectural design · Bodily experience · Everydayness of the city

Abstract

The designed space dictating a certain behavior is an element that triggers the body's desire to create its own experience. These actions towards what is designed are valuable in terms of bringing a new perspective to the long debated concept of space, as well as being an important aspect that shapes the dynamic structure of urban context. In this sense, it is predicted that thinking about the body-space relationship that is thought to exist between the designed space and life and enriches the urban content by triggering new experience possibilities; will help in re-conceptualizing space. The aim of the study is to search for the correspondences of the re-conceptualized space in terms of form through the reactions produced towards the static through the unpredictability and uncertain character of the body. Additionally, the search where their spatial perspectives can evolve is also the secondary purpose. In this context, the body's resistance to form, its production of its own space, and the relations between designed and changing space were discussed in the 2nd-year Architectural Design Studio. 11 projects produced during the studio process were evaluated according to the formation of form, and four tendencies were observed: 'dissociation of form,' 'augmentation of form,' 'translocation of form,' and 'transformation of form.' These tendencies were discussed in terms of the learning outcomes of the studio which are concept-form relationship, spatial interaction and spatial responsiveness. In light of the findings, it emerged that students could reflect the variability of body-space relationships in their form productions. However, they had not yet developed an awareness of how material and environmental factors could affect the variability of space.

🔖

Cite This Article

Torun, G. Ş., Tutal, O. (2025). Exploring Body’s Potentials in Everydayness of the City: Architectural Design Studio Experience. Journal of Design Studio, Volume: 7 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.1758196

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Augoyard, J.-F., (2007). Step by Step: Everyday Walks in a French Urban Housing Project. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
  2. Bachelard, G. (2014), The Poetics of Space, Penguin.
  3. Blanchot, M., & Hanson, S., (1987). Everyday Speech. in A. Kaplan & K. Ross (Eds.), Yale French Studies: Everyday Life (pp. 12-20). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  4. Bochenski, J. M. (1969), Contemporary European Philosophy, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
  5. Hızlı Erkılıç, N., (2019). Tanımsız Kentsel Açık Alanların Okunması ve Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Yaklaşım Önerisi. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Institute of Science, Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul.
  6. Koolhaas, R., (1995). Imagining Nothingness. in R. Koolhaas, B. Mau, OMA, J. Sigler, & H. Werlemann (Eds.), S, M, L, XL: Office for Metropolitan Architecture Rem Koolhaas and Bruce Mau (pp. 198-203). New York: Monacelli Press.
  7. Leder, D., (1990). The Absent Body. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  8. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005), Phenomenology of Perception, Routledge: London and New York. Rajchman, J., (1998). Constructions. London: the MIT Press.
  9. Sheringham, M., (2006). Everyday Life: Theories and Practices from Surrealism to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Şensoy, G., (2023). An Alternative Search of the Body - Space Relationship through the Everydayness of the City: Tensions - Releases (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Institute of Graduate Programs, Eskişehir Technical University, Eskişehir.
  11. Tschumi, B., (1975). The Architectural Paradox. in M. Hays (Ed.) Architecture, Theory, since 1968 (pp. 214-228). Massachusetts: the MIT Press.
  12. Tschumi, B. (1996), Architecture and Disjunction, The MIT Press: Massachusetts. Walker, S., (2004). Gordon Matta-Clark: Drawing on architecture. Grey Room, 18, 108-131.
  13. Walker, S., (2009). Gordon Matta-Clark: Art, Architecture and The Attack on Modernism. London: I. B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
  14. URL-1: https://www.eskisehir.edu.tr/Uploads/www/files/Üniversite%20Kataloğu/2024-2025/Mimarlık%20ve%20Tasarım%20Fak_%20-%20Türkçe.pdf, Accessed 01.11.2025
  15. URL-2: https://miro.com/tr, Accessed 01.11.2025