Journals / Horticultural Studies / 2020 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Determination of The Harvesting Time of Hass Cultivarin Antalya Conditions

Pages
102–112
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was determined that from early October to lateDecember as early harvest (23-25% DM), from January to late May asoptimum harvest (26-37% DM), and from beginning to end of June as lateharvest (≥38% DM).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Avocado cultivation in the world and Turkey, especially Hass cultivar,increases rapidly in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose; inthe fruit samples of Hass cultivar taken at 15-20 days interval from October toJune, some fruit quality traits (dry matter, flesh firmness, weight loss, taste,colour of fruit skin and flesh) during the harvest and ripening process andrelationships between of these parameters were analysed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was determined that from early October to lateDecember as early harvest (23-25% DM), from January to late May asoptimum harvest (26-37% DM), and from beginning to end of June as lateharvest (≥38% DM).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Avocado cultivation in the world and Turkey, especially Hass cultivar,increases rapidly in recent years. The fruit quality of avocado is directly relatedto harvest maturity and post-harvest ripening process and the identification ofmaturity index has a very large commercial importance. For this purpose; inthe fruit samples of Hass cultivar taken at 15-20 days interval from October toJune, some fruit quality traits (dry matter, flesh firmness, weight loss, taste,colour of fruit skin and flesh) during the harvest and ripening process andrelationships between of these parameters were analysed. As a result, it wasfound that the most reliable maturity index was the dry matter (DM) contentand that there was a direct relationship between its accumulation and theharvesting time. In cases these index values were insufficient, the otherpostharvest analyses (taste, fruit skin colour, fruit hardness and weight loss)made a contribution to determination of maturity. During the ripening process,very high levels of a positive correlation between harvest time and dry matter(r= 0.92 to 0.96) was observed. According to the fruit maturity of the Hasscultivar, three different harvest periods were defined as early, optimum (mostsuitable) and late harvests. It was determined that from early October to lateDecember as early harvest (23-25% DM), from January to late May asoptimum harvest (26-37% DM), and from beginning to end of June as lateharvest (≥38% DM).

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAM, S., TEPE, S. (2022). Determination of The Harvesting Time of Hass Cultivarin Antalya Conditions. Horticultural Studies, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 102–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/538131

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anonymous, (2005). The World Avocado Market. In; Loillet, D., & Impert, E. (Eds)., FruiTrop Focus. CiradFlhor TA 50/PS4 34398 Montpellier Cedex, France. Anonymous, (2006). Avokado. Akdeniz İhracatçılar Birliği. Pp: 27, (in Turkish). Arpaia, M. L., Boreham, D., Collin, S., Fjeld, K., & Sievert, J. (2003). Hass matury project. In: Witney, G. (Ed.) Proceedings of the California Avocado Research Symposium, pp. 120–124.
  2. Bayram, S., & Aşkın, M.A. (2006). Using of oil and dry matter parameters in some avocado cultivars for determination of harvest date. Süleyman Demirel University Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 1(2):38-48.
  3. Bayram, S., Tepe, S., & Toker, R. (2016). Determination of some physical and chemical changes in fruits of hass avocado cultivar during harvesting time. Derim, 33(1):14-26.
  4. Bayram, S., & Tepe, S. (2018). Determination of some physical and chemical changes of fruits of Edranol, Ettinger and Wurtz avocado varieties during harvest periods. Derim, 35(2):96-110.
  5. Bayram, S., & Tepe, S. (2019). Determination of some physicochemical properties in fruits of some avocado (Persea americana Mill.) cultivars during the harvesting periods. Derim, 36(1):1-12.
  6. Blumenfeld, A., Offer, R., Elimelech, M., Degani, C., & El Bazri, R. (1992). Avocado fruit maturation and criteria for harvest. Proceeding of Second World Avocado Congress, pp: 489. Cañete, M.L., Pérez de los Cobos, R., & Hueso, J.J. (2018). Influence of harvest date on sensory quality attributes of avocado ‘Hass’. Acta Horticulturea, 1194:1127-1131.
  7. Carvalho, C.P., Velásquez, M.A., & Rooyen, Z.V. (2014). Determination of the minimum dry matter index for the optimum harvest of ‘Hass’ avocado fruits in Colombia. Agronomía Colombiana, 32(3):399-406.
  8. Clark, C.J., White, A., Jordan, R.B., & Woolf, A.B. (2007). Challenges associated with segregation of avocados of differing maturity using density sorting at harvest. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 46(2):119-127.
  9. Coggins, Jr. C.W. (1984). Feasibility of using fruit size and percentage dry weight to predict maturity. California Avocado Society Yearbook, 68:145–160.
  10. Cox, K.A., McGhie, T.K., White, A., & Woolf, A.B. (2004). Skin colour and pigment changes during ripening of ‘Hass’ avocado fruits. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 31:287–294.
  11. Degani, C., Bechor, V., Albazri, R., & Blumenfeld, A. (1986). Dry weight content as an index for determination of maturity of avocado fruits. Alon Hanotea, 40:1017–1022.
  12. FAO. (2019). FAOSTAT Database. http://www.fao.o