Journals / Horticultural Studies / 2021 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

Effects of Different Pollinators on Fruit Set and QualityAttributes of Texas Almond (Prunus dulcis L.) Cultivar

Pages
46–49
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded based on presentfindings that use of A2 cultivar as a pollinator in almond orchards establishedwith Texas cultivar may have positive effects on fruit set.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There is a positive relationship between pollination and fruit yield of almonds.Since self-incompatibility is a major problem in almond cultivars, foreignpollinators are generally used in almonds to get high yield and quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thisstudy was conducted to investigate the effects of different pollinators (inbreedhybrid combinations) on fruit set and pomological characteristics of Texasalmond cultivar in 2018 - 2019 growing seasons.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded based on presentfindings that use of A2 cultivar as a pollinator in almond orchards establishedwith Texas cultivar may have positive effects on fruit set.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 - 2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

There is a positive relationship between pollination and fruit yield of almonds.Since self-incompatibility is a major problem in almond cultivars, foreignpollinators are generally used in almonds to get high yield and quality. Thisstudy was conducted to investigate the effects of different pollinators (inbreedhybrid combinations) on fruit set and pomological characteristics of Texasalmond cultivar in 2018 - 2019 growing seasons. Fruit set ratios variedbetween 3.6% (Texas × A3) and 5.2% (Texas × A4) in the first year of thestudy and between 8.0% (Texas × A3) and 13.2% (Texas × A2) in the secondyear. As the average of two years, the lowest fruit length (32.03 ± 2.45 mm)was observed in Texas × A4 combination and the greatest fruit length (35.31± 3.05 mm) was observed in Texas × A1 combination, whereas fruit widthvalues varied between 19.37 ± 2.43 mm and 23.79 ± 1.33 mm. Althoughpollinators influenced fruit mass values, the greatest value (5.73 ± 0.74 g) wasobserved in Texas × A3 combination. It was concluded based on presentfindings that use of A2 cultivar as a pollinator in almond orchards establishedwith Texas cultivar may have positive effects on fruit set.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAN, M., UZUN, A. (2022). Effects of Different Pollinators on Fruit Set and QualityAttributes of Texas Almond (Prunus dulcis L.) Cultivar. Horticultural Studies, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 46–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/538116

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Acar, I.S., Arpacı, H.S., Atli, S., Kafkas, S., Eti, S.A., & Çağlar, A. (2014). Breeding self-productive and late flowering almond varieties through hybridization. Turkey VI. National Horticulture Congress. 4-8 October 2011,
  2. Sanliurfa, Vol 1:42-48.
  3. Akkurt, E., Mertoglu, K., & Evrenosoglu, Y. (2020). Effects of different pollinator cultivars on fruit set and different fruit quality characteristics on vista bella apple cultivar. Anadolu, 30:284-294.
  4. Boyaci, S., & Caglar, S. (2009). The effect of fall foliar boron application on the fruit set of different almond cultivars. University of Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Journal of Natural Science, 12:36-43, (in Turkish). Brittain, C., Kremen, C., Garber, G., & Klein, A.M. (2014). Pollination and plant resources change the nutritional quality of almonds for human health. PLoS One, 9:e90082. Cirtlik, B.K., & Beyhan, N. (2012). An investigation of the possible use of some important local sweet cherry cultivars grown in amasya province as pollinizers for 0900 ziraat cultivar. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Scince, 27:64-69, (in Turkish). Cunningham, A.S., Evans, M.J., Neave, M., Armstrong, J., & Barton, J.B. (2019). Pollination and resource limitation as interacting constraints on almond fruit set. Plant Biology, 22:113-119.
  5. Dicenta, F., Martínez-Gómez, P., & Ortega, E. (2000). Cultivar pollinizer does not affect almond flavor. HortScience, 35:1153–1154.
  6. Ercisli, S. (2004). A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 51:419-435. Gómez, M.E., Dicenta, F., Batlle, I., Romero, A., & Ortega, E. (2019). Cross-incompatibility in the cultivated almond (Prunus dulcis): Updating, revision and correction. Scientia Horticulturae, 245:218-223.
  7. Gulcan, R. (1985). Descriptor list for almond (Prunus amygdalus). Revised Edn.). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome. Hanine, H., Zinelabidine, L.H., Kodad, O., H'ssaini, H., Haddioui, A., & Ennahli, S. (2016). Pomological, phenotypical diversity and biochemical characterization of fortheen almond morphotypes from Morocco. Options Méditerranéennes, A, (119). Khadivi, A., Goodarzi, S., & Sarkhosh, A. (2019). Identification of late-blooming almond (Prunus dulcis L.) genotypes with high kernel quality. Euphytica, 215:166. Klein, A.M., Hendrix, S.D., Clough, Y., Scofield, A., & Kremen, A. (2015). Interacting effects of pollination, water and nutrients on fruit tree performance. Plant Biology, 17:201-208.
  8. Kuden, A.B., & Kuden, A