Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 25

FACTORS WHICH SEPERATE THOSE PREFER BRAND NAME PRODUCTS FROM THE PEOPLE WHO PREFER NO NAME PRODUCTS

Markalı Ürünleri Kullananları Kullanmayanlardan Ayıran Faktörler

Pages
71–89
Publication Date
2008-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, the relations between these factors and people s characteristics are being examined by correlation analyses Finally, only in the physical factors, importance of brand name occurs effectively by logistic model

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to seperate people who prefer brand name from the people who prefer no name products and to determine the factors such as people s demographic characteristics affecting the people s choices on the brand name product.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In a questionary survey applied on the 500 students, two group factors, physical and emotional are being examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, the relations between these factors and people s characteristics are being examined by correlation analyses Finally, only in the physical factors, importance of brand name occurs effectively by logistic model
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marka · demografik özellikler · marka tercihine etki eden faktörler

Abstract

The aim of this study is to seperate people who prefer brand name from the people who prefer no name products and to determine the factors such as people s demographic characteristics affecting the people s choices on the brand name product. In a questionary survey applied on the 500 students, two group factors, physical and emotional are being examined. Additionally, the relations between these factors and people s characteristics are being examined by correlation analyses Finally, only in the physical factors, importance of brand name occurs effectively by logistic model

Özet

Bu çalışmanın hedefi, markalı ürünleri tercih edenleri tercih etmeyenlerden ayırmak ve marka tercihinde önemli olan faktörleri belirleyip, deneklerin demografik vb. özelliklerinin bu faktörlere olan etkilerini ortaya koymaktır. 500 öğrenci ile yapılan anket sonucunda, marka tercihine etki eden faktörler fiziksel ve duygusal faktörler olarak iki grupta toplanmışlar, korelasyon analizi bünyesinde ise, anılan faktörlerle deneklerin özellikleri arasında ilişki kurulmuştur. Lojistik model analizi sonucunda ise markaya verilen önem, sadece fiziksel özellikler bazında etkin bir biçimde ortaya çıkmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURTULDU, H. S. (2008). FACTORS WHICH SEPERATE THOSE PREFER BRAND NAME PRODUCTS FROM THE PEOPLE WHO PREFER NO NAME PRODUCTS. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 25, 71–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/53602

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. AR, AYBEN Z AKDEN Z: Markaya Ki ilik Kazand ran Marka smi Yaratma Stratejisi, Pazarlama Dünyas, Eylül-Ekim, 2003, s. 18. BAYKAL, CEVDET: Türk Mal ve Hizmet Kalitesinin Artt r lmas ve Marka Olu turulmas, D Ticarette Durum, 1999, Say: 42, s. 69. BURNAZ, EBNEM: Marka Yayma Yoluyla Pazara Sunulan ESG N, N LGÜN Yeni Ürünlerin Tüketiciler Aç s ndan De erlendirilmesi, Pazarlama Dünyas, 2003, Eylül- Ekim, s. 29. COLLINS, COLLEEN: Store Brands and Retail Differentiation: INDLEY,TARA The Influence of Store Image and Store Brand Attitude on Store Own Brand Perceptions, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,, ss. 2003, 349- 350. COOPER, S.: Economy Line Foods From Your NELSON, M. Supermarkets and Brand Name Equivalents: A Comparison of Their Nutrient Contents and Costs, The British Dietetic Association Ltd, 2003, s. 346. ERDEM, TÜL N: Brand Equity, Consumer Learning and Choice, Marketing Letters, Kluwer Academic Publishers, ss. 1999, 312-313.
  2. SWAIT, JOFFRE BRONIARCZYK, SUSAN CHAKRAVARTI, DIPANKAR KAPFERER, JEAN-NOEL KEANE, MICHAEL ROBERTS, JOHN STEENKAMP, SAN-BENEDICT ZETTELMEYER, FLORIAN FIRLAR, F. BELMA GÜNER: Günümüzde Marka ve Konumunun GONTIJO, POSSIDONIA Belirlenmesi, Pazarlama Dünyas, 2000, May s-Haziran, s. 22. HAYNES, ANDY: Comprehensive Brand Presentation: LACKMAN, CONWAY Ensuring Consistent Brand Image, GUSKEY, AUDREY Journal of Product and Brand Management, 1999, Vol. 8, No. 4, s. 295. KAISER, H.F.: An Index of Factorial Simplicity, Psyhometrica,, 1974, s. 84. KLEIN, N. No Logo: Küresel Markalar Hedef Tahtas nda, stanbul, Bilgi Yay nevi, 2002, s. 44. KLINK, RICHARD R.: Creating Brand Names With Meaning: The Use of Sound Symbolism, Marketing Letters, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, s. 17. KORKMAZ, SEZER: Marka Olu turma Sürecinde Hipermarket (Da t c ) Markalar ve Bu Markalar n Tan nm l k Düzeylerini çeren Bir Ara t rma, Pazarlama Dünyas, 2000, Eylül- Ekim - 05, s. 32. KUNDE, J: irket Dini,,MediaCat Yay nlar, stanbul 2002, ss. 52- 63. KURTULU, K: Pazarlama Ara t rmalar, Literatür Yay nlar, stanbul, 2004, s.192. LACHANCE, WARIE, J: Adolescents Brand Sensivity in BEAUDOIN, PIERRE Apparel: Influence of Three ROBITAILLE, JEAN Socialization Agents, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2003,s.51. LAU, GEOK THENG: Consumers Trust in a Brand and the LEE, SOOK HAN Link to Brand Loyalty, Journal of Market Focused Management, ss. 1999, 356-360.
  3. MCCARTHY, MICHAEL S.: New Brands Versus Brand Extentions HEATH, TIMOTHY, B. Attitudes