Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3

Clinical Correlates of Restrictive Type Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adolescents

Pages
295–299
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Regarding the par - ent-rated scales; the total, hyperactivity, conduct problems, and oppositional scores of T-DSM-IV-S; and the total, hyperac- tivity and learning problems scores of CPRS were found to be higher in adolescents with ADHD/I when compared to those with ADHD/R (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Clinical correlates of the proposed restrictive type attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD/R) is not well established in adolescents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 87 adolescents (mean: 143 months, 73.5% male) with a DSM-V ADHD diagnosis were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Regarding the par - ent-rated scales; the total, hyperactivity, conduct problems, and oppositional scores of T-DSM-IV-S; and the total, hyperac- tivity and learning problems scores of CPRS were found to be higher in adolescents with ADHD/I when compared to those with ADHD/R (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical correlates of the proposed restrictive type attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD/R) is not well established in adolescents. There is still controversy on the validity of ADHD/R as a distinct entity from ADHD predominantly inattentive (ADHD/I). This study aims to define the clinical symptoms of ADHD/R and compare of ADHD/R with other sub - types of ADHD in adolescents. Methods: A total of 87 adolescents (mean: 143 months, 73.5% male) with a DSM-V ADHD diagnosis were included in the study. ADHD subtypes, including the proposed ADHD/R, were diagnosed based on clinical interview, parental reports, and teacher reports. Study measures included the Turgay DSM-IV based ADHD rating Scale (T-DSM-IV-S) parent and teacher forms, conners’ parent rating scale (CPRS), and Conners’ teacher rating scale revised. Results: Thirty-nine adolescents (44.8%) had ADHD combined (ADHD/C), 33 (37.9%) had ADHD/I, and 15 (17.2%) had ADH- D/R subtype. Regarding gender, no significant difference was found between ADHD/I and ADHD/R. Regarding the par - ent-rated scales; the total, hyperactivity, conduct problems, and oppositional scores of T-DSM-IV-S; and the total, hyperac- tivity and learning problems scores of CPRS were found to be higher in adolescents with ADHD/I when compared to those with ADHD/R (p

🔖

Cite This Article

EKİNCİ, Ö., YAŞÖZ, C., DOĞAN, Ö. İ., EKİNCİ, N., BAŞ, S. A. İ., ADAK, İ. (2022). Clinical Correlates of Restrictive Type Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adolescents. Haydarpaşa Numune Medical Journal, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3, 295–299. https://ajindex.com/articles/535916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Polanczyk GV, Salum GA, Sugaya LS, Caye A, Rohde LA. Annual research review: A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. J Child Psy- chol Psychiatry 2015;56:345–65
  2. Willcutt EG, Nigg JT, Pennington BF, Solanto MV, Rohde LA, Tannock R, et al. Validity of DSM-IV attention deficit/hyperac- tivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes. J Abnorm Psychol 2012;121:991–1010
  3. Lahey BB, Willcutt EG. Predictive validity of a continuous alter- native to nominal subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder for DSM-V. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2010;39:761– 75
  4. Lahey BB, Pelham WE, Loney J, Lee SS, Willcutt E. Instability of the DSM-IV subtypes of ADHD from preschool through ele - mentary school. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:896–902
  5. Epstein JN, Loren RE. Changes in the definition of ADHD in DSM-5: Subtle but ımportant. Neuropsychiatry (London) 2013;3:455–8
  6. Ercan ES, Suren S, Bacanli A, Yazici KU, Calli C, Ozyurt O, et al. Decreasing ADHD phenotypic heterogeneity: Searching for neurobiological underpinnings of the restrictive inattentive phenotype. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2016;25:273–82
  7. Turgay A. Disruptive Behavior Disorders Child and Adoles- cent Screening and Rating Scales for Children, Adolescents, Parents and Teachers. West Bloomfield, Michigan: Integrative Therapy Institute Publication; 1994
  8. Ercan ES, Amado S, Somer O, Çıkoğlu S. Dikkat eksikliği hiper- aktivite bozukluğu ve yıkıcı davranım bozuklukları için bir test bataryası geliştirme çabası. Çocuk Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Derg 2001;8:132–44
  9. Goyette CH, Conners CK, Ulrich RF. Normative data on revised conners parent and teacher rating scales. J Abnorm Child Psy- chol 1978;6:221–36
  10. Dereboy C, Senol S, Sener S, Dereboy F. Validation of the Turk- ish versions of the short-form conners’ teacher and parent rat- ing scales (in Turkish). Turk Psikiyatr Derg 2007;18:48–58
  11. Sener S, Dereboy C, Dereboy IF, Sertcan Y. Conners’teacher rat- ing scale Turkish version-1. Turk J Child Adolesc Ment Health 1995;2:131–41
  12. Willcutt EG, Chhabildas N, Kinnear M, DeFries JC, Olson RK, Leopold DR, et al. The internal and external validity of slug- gish cognitive tempo and its relation with DSM-IV ADHD. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2014;42:21–35
  13. Schmitz M1, Ludwig H, Rohde LA. Do hyperactive symptoms matter in ADHD-I restricted phenotype? J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2010;39:741–8
  14. DuPaul GJ, Reid R, Anastopoulos AD, Lambert MC,