Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

The comparison of physical examination, nasal endoscopy and computed tomography findings in patients with epistaxis

Epistaksis'li hastalarda muayene-nasal endoskopi-bilgisayarlı tomografi bulgularının karşılaştırılması

Pages
213–215
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We searched the use of the endoscopie examination and the computerized tomography in the patients with Epistaksis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We searched the use of the endoscopie examination and the computerized tomography in the patients with Epistaksis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We searched the use of the endoscopie examination and the computerized tomography in the patients with Epistaksis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We searched the use of the endoscopie examination and the computerized tomography in the patients with Epistaksis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We searched the use of the endoscopie examination and the computerized tomography in the patients with Epistaksis.

Özet

Epistaksisli hastalarda normal muayeneye ek olarak yapılan endoskopik muayene ve gerekli durumlarda yapılan bilgisayarlı tomografik tetkikin katkıları incelendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞAN, H., SÜTBEYAZ, M. Y., AYVERDİ, M., USLU, C. (2022). The comparison of physical examination, nasal endoscopy and computed tomography findings in patients with epistaxis. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 213–215. https://ajindex.com/articles/535747

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Stammberger. Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery 1990 B.C. Decker Philedelphia
  2. Kern L. Office endoscopy, The Otolaryngologıc Clinic of North America August 1989
  3. Cummings Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Third edıti-on.W:2 P:852-865 Mosby 1998
  4. Economou T.S. Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibrma Laryngoscope 1998; 98: 170-174
  5. Önercı M. Endoskopik sinüs cerrahisi. Ankara. 1996
  6. Schaefer S. D. An anatomic approach to Endoscopic intranasal ethmoıdectomy Laryngoscope 1998; 108:1628-34. 7-Weınberg E. A.Clinical classification as a guide to treatment of sinusitis in children Laryngoscope 1997; 107:241-6
  7. Krempl G.A. Use of oxymelazoline in the management of episla-xisAna Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104:704-6
  8. O'Learly S.K. Rigit endoscopy for control of epistaxis Arch Oto-laryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 118:966-7
  9. Glicklich R.E. Economic implication of chronic sinusitis Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 1998;118,(3):344-9
  10. Şerbetçi E. Lateral nasal duvarın cerrahi anatomisi, endoskopik sinüs cerrahisindeki bazı önemli uzaklıklar KBB dergisi 1992; 26-9
  11. Padgham N. Epistaxis: anatomic and clinical correlates Journal of Laryngology and Otology 1990: 104:308-11
  12. Tseng E. Y. Angiografic embolisation for epistaksis Laryngoscope 1998; 108:615-9.