Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

Down sendromu riskinin birinci trimester de Ultra-screen test ile belirlenmesi ve Tripple test ile karşılaştırılması

Pages
67–69
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Although Down syndrome screening tests still have not proven the ultra-screen test has been shown to be comparable to the Triple test, while the earlier timing may be considered to be an advantage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To determine Down syndrome risk combining biochemical markers, fetal nuchal translucency and maternal age and comparing results with the triple test.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Study design: A total of 121 pregnant women seen at an outpatient clinic between February 1998 and October 2000 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Although Down syndrome screening tests still have not proven the ultra-screen test has been shown to be comparable to the Triple test, while the earlier timing may be considered to be an advantage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To determine Down syndrome risk combining biochemical markers, fetal nuchal translucency and maternal age and comparing results with the triple test. Study design: A total of 121 pregnant women seen at an outpatient clinic between February 1998 and October 2000 were included in the study. The maternal serum PAPP-A, free (-hCG and the ultrasonographic nuchal translucency measurements at 11-14 weeks were combined with the patient's age and pregnancy related Down syndrome risks were calculated using a special software program at the New. York NTD Laboratories. The triple test was performed at 16-18 weeks on the same patient group. Amniocentesis was performed on patients with positive screening results. Data for both groups was compared. Results: Risk positivity was 3.2%, specificity 96.6%, false positivity 3.3% and true negativity 100% using the Ultra-screen test. The Triple test resulted in 1.7% risk positivity, 98.3% specificity, 1.6% false positivity and 100% true negativity. Amniocentesis was performed on a total of 5 patients (one included and both groups) and all were reported as constitutional karyotypes. There was no statistically significant difference between the results of the two tests. Conclusions: Although Down syndrome screening tests still have not proven the ultra-screen test has been shown to be comparable to the Triple test, while the earlier timing may be considered to be an advantage.

Özet

Amaç: Down sendromu riskinin biyokimyasal markerlar, fetal ense ödemi ve anne yaşı kullanılarak belirlenmesi ve üçlü tarama testi ile karşılaştırılması. Çalışma deseni: Şubat 1998-Ekim 2000 tarihleri arası antenatal polikliniğimize başvuran 121 gebe Down sendromu riski açısından çalışmaya dahil edildi. Gebeliklerinin 11-14 haftaları arası maternal serum PAPP-A ve free (-hCG, fetal ultrasonografik marker olarakta Nuchal Translucency ölçüldü ve anne yaşı ile kombine edilerek New York NTD laboratuarlarında özel bir software programı ile gebeye özgü Down sendromu riski hesaplandı. Aynı gebelere 16-18. hafta arası Tripple test yapıldı. Test sonucu pozitif olanlara amniosentez yapıldı. Bulgular: Ultra-screen test ile risk pozitifliği %3.2, spesifitesi %96.6, gerçek negatiflik oranı %100 olarak hesaplandı. Tripple test ile spesifite %98.3, gerçek negatiflik %100 olarak hesaplandı. Amniosentez toplam beş hastaya yapıldı ve hepsi normal karyotip olarak rapor edildi. Sonuç: Henüz Down sendromu tarama testlerinin güvenirliliği istenen düzeye ulaşmamıştır. Ancak ultra-screen testin sağladığı zaman avatajı lehine bir parametre olarak yorumlanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KELEKCİ, S., KILINÇ, Z., TEKİN, G., COŞGUN, T. (2022). Down sendromu riskinin birinci trimester de Ultra-screen test ile belirlenmesi ve Tripple test ile karşılaştırılması. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 67–69. https://ajindex.com/articles/535720

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Gardner RJM,Sultherland GR (ed). Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counting. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989
  2. Thompson MW, Mcinnes RR, Willard HF. Genetics n Medicine (Fifth edition). W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1991
  3. Wald NJ, Kennard A, Hackshsw A. Antenatal Screening For Down's Syndrome. J Med Screening 1997:4:181-246
  4. Beksaç MS. Perinatal morbidite ve mortalitenin azaltılmasında değişik fetal monitörizasyon tekniklerinin kullanılması ve bilgisayar uygulaması. DPT-Teknolojik Araştırma, 90K120540, Ankara, 1993
  5. Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, et al. Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome with use of maternal serum markers. N Eng J Med 1992:327:588-93
  6. Wladimiroff JW, Bhaggoe WR, Kristelijin M, et al. Sonographi-cally determined anomalies and outcome in 170 chromosomally abnormal fetuses. Prenat Diagn. 1995:15:431-8
  7. Cheng EY, Luthy DA, Zebelman AM, et al. A prospective evaluation of a second trimaster screening test for fetal Down syndrome using maternal serum AFP, hCG, UE3. Obstet Gynecol. 1993: 81(1): 72-6
  8. Haddow JE, Palomaki GE, Knight GJ. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome with use of maternal serum markers. N Engl J Med. 1992:327:588
  9. Nicolaides KH, Azar G, Byrne D, et al. Fetal Nuchal Translu-cency: Ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in the first trimaster of pregnancy. Br Med J 1992:304: 867-9
  10. Wald JN, Kennard A, Hackshow AK. First trimaster serum screening for Down's syndrome. Prenatal Diagnosis. 1995:15: 1227-40
  11. Pandya PP, Snijders RJM, Johnson SJ, et al. Screening for fetal trisomies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10 to 14 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1995: 102:957-62
  12. Muller F, Cuckle H, Tenser, B, et al. Serum PAPP-A levels are depressed women with fetal Down Syndrome in early pregnancy. Prenatal Diagnosis. 1993: 13: 633-6
  13. Greco P, Loverro G, VimercatiA, etal. Pathological Significance of first-tremaster fetal nuchal oedema. Prenat Diagn. 1996: 16: 503-9
  14. Berry E, Aitken DA, Crossley JA, et al. Screening lor Down Syndrom changes in marker levels and detection rates between first and second trimasters. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1997: 104:811-7
  15. Wald NJ et al. PAPP-A and Nuchal Translucency measurement for 1st trimasted Down Syndrome screening. N Engl J Med. 1999: 341:461-7
  16. Hurley PA, Ward Rht, Teisner B, et al. Serum PAPP-A measurements in first trimaster screening for Down Syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 1993: 13:903-9
  17. Wald NJ, Geo