Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of fentanyl, alfentanyl and remifentanyl in the control of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation

Trakeal entübasyona hemodinamik yanıtın kontrolünde fentanil, alfentanil ve remifentanilin karşılaştırılması

Pages
18–23
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, in order to prevent the hemodynamic effects of tracheal entubation, 2$mu$g/kg remifentanyl is a good alternative to 30$mu$g/kg alfentanyl but 1.25$mu$g/kg remifentanyl is not enough to prevent this effect, in addition, in this study, we recognized that because of the respiratory system depression effect of the remifentanyl, with dosage of 1.25$mu$g/kg and above even in slow adminastration should not be given to patients with spontaneous respiration.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We studied the effects of bolus of fentanyl, alfetanyl and two different doses of remifentanyl on hemodynamic affect because of entubation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A hundred patients enrolled in this study with age 18-65 and ASA l-ll.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, in order to prevent the hemodynamic effects of tracheal entubation, 2$mu$g/kg remifentanyl is a good alternative to 30$mu$g/kg alfentanyl but 1.25$mu$g/kg remifentanyl is not enough to prevent this effect, in addition, in this study, we recognized that because of the respiratory system depression effect of the remifentanyl, with dosage of 1.25$mu$g/kg and above even in slow adminastration should not be given to patients with spontaneous respiration.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We studied the effects of bolus of fentanyl, alfetanyl and two different doses of remifentanyl on hemodynamic affect because of entubation. A hundred patients enrolled in this study with age 18-65 and ASA l-ll. The patients with cardiopulmonary, renal and hepatic problems and mallonpaty H-IV and obesity were excluded. Patiets were randomized in to five groups. Each group consists of 20 patients. 0.07 mg/kg midazolam were administered as a premedication. 25 $mu$/kg remifentanyl to first group, 2 $mu$g/kg remifentanyl to second group, 3$mu$g/kg fentanyl to third group, 30$mu$g/kg alfentanyl to fourth group, 10 ml isotonic solution as placebo to fifth goup were given in less than 60 seconds. Intubation was achieved by giving 5mg/Kg tiyopental and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronyum. After one minute, entubation was done. Levels of SAP, DAP, MAP, HR, and SaO2 of patients recorded. As a result, in order to prevent the hemodynamic effects of tracheal entubation, 2$mu$g/kg remifentanyl is a good alternative to 30$mu$g/kg alfentanyl but 1.25$mu$g/kg remifentanyl is not enough to prevent this effect, in addition, in this study, we recognized that because of the respiratory system depression effect of the remifentanyl, with dosage of 1.25$mu$g/kg and above even in slow adminastration should not be given to patients with spontaneous respiration.

Özet

Entübasyonun neden olduğu hemodinamik yanıtı önlemede fentanil, alfentanil ve iki farklı remifentanil dozunun bolus uygulamalarının etkilerini karşılaştırdık. ASA 1-11,18-65 yaş arası, elektif 100 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Kardiyovasküler, pulmoner, renal, hepatik hastalığı olan mallampati III-IV ve obes hastalar çalışmaya alınmadı. Rastgele 20'Ii beş gruba ayrılan hastalar 0,07 mg/kg midazolam ile premedike edildi, indüksiyondan önce 1.gruba 1,25 $mu$g/kg remifentanil, 2.gruba 2 $mu$g/kg remifentanil, S.gruba 3 $mu$g/kg fentanil, 4.gruba 30 $mu$g/kg alfentanil, 5.gruba (plasebo) 10 ml. serum fizyolojil 60 sn.'den hızlı olmayacak şekilde verildi. 5 mg/kg tiyopen-tal ve 0,6 mg/kg rokuronyum ile sağlandı.1 dk. sonra entübasyon gerçekleştirildi. Hastaların SAB, DAB, OAB,KAH ve SaO2 değerleri kaydedildi. Sonuç olarak; trakeal entübasyona hemodinamik yanıtı önlemede 2 $mu$g/kg remifentanilin, 30 $mu$g/kg alfentanile iyi bir alternatif olduğgu, 1,25 $mu$g/kg remifentanilin ise bu yanıtı önlemede yetersiz kaldığı, ayrıca remifentanilin çalışmamızda gözlediğimiz güçlü solunumu deprese edici etkisinden dolayı, 1,25 $mu$g/kg ve üzerindeki dozlarında, yavaş bolus uygulamada dahi spontan solumdaki hastalarda uygun olmadığı kararına vardık.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, N., EKİNCİ, O., GÜLER, F. (2022). Comparison of fentanyl, alfentanyl and remifentanyl in the control of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 18–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/535712

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Collins VJ.'.Principles of Anesthesia
  2. Endotrakeal Anesthesia III Complications 3. th edition, Lea-Febirger, Philedelphia, 1993
  3. Vol1.571-575 2. Derbyshire DR., Chimelewski A., Fell D., Vater M., Achola K, Smith G.: Plasma catecolamine responses to tracheal intubation. Br. J. Anaesth 55:855-859, 1993 3. Chraemmer B., Hertel S., Strom J., Carlsen P.F., Bjerre-Jepsen.: Catecolamine response to laryngoskopi and intubation: Anaesthesia 1992:47:750-756 4. Shribman A.J., Smith G., Achola K.J.: Cardiovaskular and catec-holamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br.J.Anaesth. 1987
  4. 299 5. Russel W.J., Morris R.G., Frewm D.B., Drew S.E.: Changes in plasma catecholamine consentrations during endotracheal intuba-tion. Br.J.Anasth. 1981,53:837 6. Edwards N.D., Alford A.M., Dopson P.M.S., Peacock J.E., Reilly C.S: Myocardial ischaemia during tracheal intubation and extubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1994
  5. 539 7. Millar Forbes A., Dally EG.: Acute hypertension during induction of anaesthesia. Br.J. Anaesth. 1970
  6. 618 8. Prys Roberts C, GreeneL T: Studies of anaesthesia in relation to hypertension. Br.J. Anaesth.1998
  7. 122 9. Crawford D.C., Fell D., Achola K.J., Smith G.: Effects of alfentanil on the pressor and catecholamine responses to tracheal intubation. Br.J. Anaesth. 1987:59:707-712 10. Martineau R.J., Tousignant C.P., Miller D.R., Hull K.A.:Alfentanil controls the haemodynamic response during rapid sequence indution of anaesthesia. Can J. Anaesth. 1990
  8. 761 11. Tezcan C, Dönmez A., Özatamer O.: Alfentanil ve fentanilin trakeal entübasyona bağlı kan basıncı, kalp hızı ve katekolamin düzey değişikliklerine etkileri. Anestezi Dergisi 1995
  9. 3(1):18-22 12. Thompson J.P., HallA.P, Russell J., Cagney B., Rowbotham D.J.: Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation. Br.J.Anaesth. 1998
  10. 469 13. Hall A. P., Thompson J.P., Leslie N.A.P, Fox A.J., Kumar A/., Rowbotham D.J.: Comparison of different doses of remifentanil on the cardiovascular response to laryggoscopy and tracheal intubation. Br.J.Anaesth.2000
  11. 102 14. McAtamney D., O'Hare R., Hughes D., Carabine U., Mirakhur R.: Evaluation of remifentanil for control of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1998)53:1209-1227 15. Q'Hare R., McAtamney D., Mirakhur R.K., Hughes D., Carabine U.: Bolus dose remifentanil for control of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation during rapid sequence in