Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4

P0.1 başarılı "Weaning" için bir parametre midir?

P0.1 is it a predictor of successful weaning?

Pages
220–222
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We thing as this study was done with a limited number of patients, it might be repeated as the number of patients increases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Commonly used predictors of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation are arterial oxygenation, pulmonary mechanics, inspiratory muscle's strength and ability to breath spontaneously.
📊
Key Findings & Data:P0. 1 is a noninvasive, reproducible technique to measure central respiratory drive.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We thing as this study was done with a limited number of patients, it might be repeated as the number of patients increases.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Commonly used predictors of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation are arterial oxygenation, pulmonary mechanics, inspiratory muscle's strength and ability to breath spontaneously. P0. 1 is a noninvasive, reproducible technique to measure central respiratory drive. We studied 15 patients during six months. All patients were mechanically ventilated at least for seven days and they all had tracheotomy. P0. 1 values were measured and recorded during weaning. Of the 15 patients ten were successfully weaned and five were failed. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of demographic and respiratory data between groups. We thing as this study was done with a limited number of patients, it might be repeated as the number of patients increases.

Özet

Başarılı "weaning" için kullanılan parametreler arteryel oksijenasyon, solunum mekaniği, inspiratuvar kas gücü, ve spontan solunumun yeterli olmasıdır. P0.1 santral solunum yeterliliğinin bir göstergesi olup, invazif olmayan bir yöntemle kolaylıkla ölçülebilmektedir. Çeşitli nedenlerle 7 gün ve üzerinde mekanik ventilasyon uygulanan ve trakeostomi açılan 15 hasta çalışmaya alındı. Mekanik ventilasyondan ayırma (weaning) aşamasında P0. 1 değerleri ölçülerek kaydedildi. 10 hastada başarılı "weaning" sağlandı.Başarılı "weaning" sağlanan grup (n=10) ile başarısız "weaning" grubu (n=5) arasında demografik, solunum parametreleri ve P0. 1değerleri arasında istatistiksel anlamlı fark bulunmadı. Çalışmamızda P0. 1 ölçümleri arasında fark bulunmamakla birlikte hasta sayısının az olduğu ve daha fazla hasta ile yapılacak çalışmalara gerek olduğu kanısına vardık.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜLTEKİN, A., DİNÇER, E., AKGÜN, N., ORMANCI, F., BAYRAM, K. H., DURMUŞ, Y. (2022). P0.1 başarılı "Weaning" için bir parametre midir?. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 4, 220–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/535711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Kuhlen R. Hausmann S, Pappert D, Slama K, Rossalnt R, Fal-ke K. A new method for PO. 1 measurement using standard respiratory equipment. Intensive Care Med 1995; 21:554-560
  2. Hilbert G. Gruson D, Portel L, Vargas F. Gbikpi-Benissan G, Car-dmaud JP. Airway occlusion pressure at 0.1 s (P0.1) after extuba-tion: an early indicator of postextubation hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency Intensive Care Med 1998:24(12): 277-82
  3. Kuhlen R, Mohnhaupt R, Slama K, Hausmann S, Pappert D, Rossaint R, Falke K. Validation and clinical application of a continuous P0.1 measurement using standard respiratory equipment. Techno! Health Care 1996; 4(4): 415-24
  4. Whitelaw WA. Derenne JP, Milic-Emili J. Occlusion pressure as a measure of respiratory center output in conscious man. Respir Physiol 1975:23: 181
  5. Grunstein MM. Younes M, Milic-Emili J. Control of tidal volume and respiratory frequency in anaesthetized cats. J Appl Physiol 1973:35:463
  6. Eldridge FL, Vaughn KZ. Relationship of thoracic volume and airway occlusion pressure: muscular effects. J Appl Physiol 1977; 43:312
  7. Herrera M, Blasco J, Venegas J, Barba R, Doblas A. Marquez E. Mouth occlusion pressure (P0.1) in acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 1985; 11: 134
  8. Conti G, De Blasi R, Pelaia P. Benito S. Rocco M, Antonelli M, Bufi M. Mattia C, Gasparetto A. Early prediction of successful weaning during pressure support ventilation in chronic obstructive pul monary disease patients. Crit Care Med 1992; 20(3): 366-71.