Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of ondansetron and droperidol in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in cases of supratentorial craniotomy

Supratentorial kraniotomi olgularında postoperatif bulantı, kusmanın önlenmesinde ondansetron ve droperidolün karşılaştırılması

Pages
96–99
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nausea was significantly rare in Group O and D on the postoperative 4th and 8th hours compared to Group P (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:While postoperative nausea and vomiting in craniotomy cases is a cause of patient discomfort, increase of intracranial pressure during the physical activity of vomiting can also cause some deleterious side effects such as deterioration of cerebral perfusion and hemostasis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy on the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting and side effects of ondansetron and droperidol in supratentorial craniotomy patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nausea was significantly rare in Group O and D on the postoperative 4th and 8th hours compared to Group P (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

While postoperative nausea and vomiting in craniotomy cases is a cause of patient discomfort, increase of intracranial pressure during the physical activity of vomiting can also cause some deleterious side effects such as deterioration of cerebral perfusion and hemostasis. Medications for the prohylaxis of nausea and vomiting in craniotomy patients should not cause sedation, because postoperative neurologic evaluation is important. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy on the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting and side effects of ondansetron and droperidol in supratentorial craniotomy patients. Following the approval of hospital ethics committee, a total of 36 (n=12) patients between the ages of 15 and 70 in ASA Group l-ll were included in this randomized double blind study. Intramuscular atropin (0,5 mg) and diazepam (10 mg) were given for premedication. Fentanil, thiopental, rokuronium, sevofluran were used for induction. Antiemetics were given intravenously during the closure of the dura, as 5 cc saline in Group P, ondansetron 4 mg in Group O, droperidol 0.625 mg in Group D. Meperidin 1 mg/kg (I.M.) was used for postoperative analgesia. Nausea and vomiting episodes were noted on the 0 min, 30th min, 60th min, 4th hour, 24th hour, and 48th hour. Metoclopromide (10 mg I.V.) was given for the treatment nausea/vomiting. Side effects and complications were noted. Nausea was significantly rare in Group O and D on the postoperative 4th and 8th hours compared to Group P (p

Özet

Kraniotomi uygulanan olgularda postoperatif bulantı kusma hasta konforunu bozarken, kafa içi basınç artışı, serebral perfüzyon ve hemostazda bozulma gibi istenmeyen etkiler ortaya çıkarabilir. Bulantı ve kusmanın önlenmesi için kullanılan ilaçlar postoperatif nörolojik takibin önemli olduğu kraniotomi olgularında sedasyon oluşturmamalıdır. Çalışmanın amacı; supratentorial kraniotomi uygulanan hastalarda ondansetron ve droperidol'ün postoperatif bulantı, kusmayı önlemedeki etkinlikleri ve yan etkiler açısından karşılaştırmaktır. Hastane etik komite onayı alınarak ASA l-ll grubunda 15-70 yaş arası 36 (n=12) hasta çalışmaya alındı. Randomize ve çift kör olarak yapılan çalışmada hastalara premedikasyondan sonra fentanil, pentothal, rokuronyum, sevofluran ile genel anestezi uygulandı. Antiemetikler duranın kapatılması sırasında Grup P'ye; 5 cc şalin, Grup O'ya; ondansetron 4mgr, Grup D'ye; droperidol 0.625 mgr İ.V verildi. Postoperatif ; O.dk, 30.dk, 60.dk, 4.st, 8.st, 24.st, 48.st; de; bulantı, kusma epizodları kaydedilerek gerekli ise metoklopromid 10 mgr İ.V uygulandı. Yan etki ve komplikasyonlar kaydedildi. Postoperatif 4-8. saatlerde bulantı grup O ve D'de grup P'ye göre anlamlı olarak az gözlendi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TURAN, G., DİNÇER, E., AKGÜN, N., ÖZKAN, T. S., ÇELİK, H. (2022). Comparison of ondansetron and droperidol in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting in cases of supratentorial craniotomy. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 96–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/535682

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Warnel DS Hindman BJ Todd MM et al. Intracranial pressure and hemodynamic effects of remifentanil versus alfentanil in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. Anesth Analg 1996 83 348-53 2.Lauer K. Connolly LA, Schmeling WT. Opioid sedation do es not alter ıntracranial pressure in head injured patients. Can J Anaesth 1997:44:929-33. 3.Morgan E, Mikhail MS. Clinical Anesthesiology. 3rd ed Stamford: Appleton & Lange 2002
  2. GeszteziA, Mootz BL, White P. The use of a remifentanil in fusion for hemodynamic control druing intracranial surgery. Anesth Analg 1999
  3. Guy J, Hindman BJ, Baker KZ et at. Comparison of remi fentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for sup- ratentorial space-occupying lesions. Anesth 1997
  4. Balakrishnan G, Raudzens P Samra K. A comparison of re mifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing surgery for int racranial mass lesions. Anesth Analg 2000
  5. Coles P Leary TS, Monteiro N. Propofol anesthesia for cra niotomy: a double-blind comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil and fentanyl. J Neurosurg Anesth 2000:12:15-20. 8.Pitts MC. Palmore MM, Salmenpera MD et al. Hemodyna mic effects of intravenous GI87084B (Gl) in patients undergo ing elective surgery. Anesth 1992
  6. Sa Rego M, Inagaki Y, White P. Remifentanil administration during monitored anesthesia care: are intermittant boluses an effective alternative to a continuous infusion? Anesth Analg 1999:88:518-22. 10.Kross R. Ferri E, Leung D. A comparative study between a calcium channel blocker (nicardipine) and a combined a-b- blocker (labetalol) for the control of emergence hypertension during craniotomy for tumor surgery. Anesth Analg 2000
  7. Kawaguchi M, Furuya H. Kurehara K. Yamada M. Effects of nicardipine on cerebral vascular responses to hypocapnia and blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery.Stroke 199122:1170-2. 12.Combes P. Durand M. Combined effects of nicardipine and hypocapnic alkalosis on cerebral vasomotor activity and intrac ranial pressure in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1991:41:207-11. 13.O'Hare RA. Mirakhur RK. Reid JE. Recovery from propofol anesthesia supplemented with remifentanil. Br J Anaesth 2001:86:361-5. 14.Wilhelm W, Schlaich N, Harrer J. Recovery and neurologi cal examination after remifentanii-desfiuran or fentanyl-desflu- ran anaesthesia for carotid surgery. Br J Anaesth 2001: 86: 44 - 9. 15.Sungun MB, Madenoğlu H. Doğru K. Supratentorial Krani- yotomilerde Fentanil ve Re