SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 26

TEACHERS’ BEHAVIORS OF SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL SUPPORT AND STUDENTS ’ PERCEIVED AMOUNT OF LEARNING (PAL)

ÖĞRETMENLERN SOSYAL-DUYGUSAL DESTEK DAVRANIŞLARI VE ÖĞRENCİLERİN ALGILADIĞI ÖĞRENME DÜZEYİ

Adem Sultan TURANLI
Pages
15–27
Publication Date
2009-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the study showed that teachers differ in terms of their behaviors of social-emotional support: it was seen that the teachers of the students who have higher perceived amount of learning tend to exert behaviors of social-emotional support more often.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to identify the relationships between teachers ’ behaviors of social- emotional support and their effects on students! perceptions about their learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A 12-item questionnaire was used to measure teachers ı behaviors of social-emotional support and their students ’ perceived amount of learning (PAL).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the study showed that teachers differ in terms of their behaviors of social-emotional support: it was seen that the teachers of the students who have higher perceived amount of learning tend to exert behaviors of social-emotional support more often.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Algılanan öğrenme miktarı · sosyal-duygusal destek · öğretmen davranışları

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the relationships between teachers ’ behaviors of social- emotional support and their effects on students! perceptions about their learning. A 12-item questionnaire was used to measure teachers ı behaviors of social-emotional support and their students ’ perceived amount of learning (PAL). The data were gathered from over 1200 students about 58 teachers ı behaviors of social-emotional support. Factor analysis and tests of reliability indicated that the 12-item questionnaire could be used as a one-factor scale. Regression analysis indicated that teachers ı behaviors of support can very strongly predict students ı perceived amount of learning (PAL). When teachers support their students, students feel they learn more. Finally, the study showed that teachers differ in terms of their behaviors of social-emotional support: it was seen that the teachers of the students who have higher perceived amount of learning tend to exert behaviors of social-emotional support more often.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmenlerin sosyal-duygusal destek davranışlarıyla bu davranışların, öğrencilerin kendi öğrenme miktarlarına dair algıları üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda öğretmenlerin sosyal-duygusal destek davranışlarını ve öğrencilerin algıladığı öğrenme düzeylerini belirlemek için 12 maddelik bir anket kullanıldı. Veriler, 58 öğretmenin sosyal duygusal destek davranışlarını belirlemek üzere 1200’den fazla öğrenciden elde edildi. Faktör analizi ve güvenilirlik testleri, anketin tek faktörlü bir ölçek olarak kullanılabileceğini ve regresyon analizi, öğretmenin destek davranışlarının algılanan öğrenme miktarını kestirmede kullanılabileceğini gösterdi. Öğrenciler gereken desteği aldığında daha çok öğrendiklerini düşünmektedirler. Son olarak bu araştırma, öğretmenler arasında sosyal-duygusal destek davranışları açısından farklılıklar olduğunu ortaya koydu: daha yüksek öğrenme algısına sahip olan öğrencilerin öğretmenlerinin, sosyal duygusal destek davranışlarını daha fazla sergiledikleri görüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURANLI, A. S. (2009). TEACHERS’ BEHAVIORS OF SOCIAL-EMOTIONAL SUPPORT AND STUDENTS ’ PERCEIVED AMOUNT OF LEARNING (PAL). Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 26, 15–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/53567

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Adler, N. L., & Moulton, M. R. (1998). The eye of the beholder: Middle schoolers talk about caring. Schools in the Middle, January/February, 7(3), 6-7.
  2. Banner, J. M. Jr., & Cannon, H. C. (1997).
  3. The elements of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  4. Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill. Cooper, B. (2004). Empathy, interaction and caring: Teachers roles in a constrained environment. Pastoral Care, September, 12-24.
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & McCormack, J. (1986). The influence of teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 415-419.
  6. Davidson, A. (1999). Negotiating social differences: Youths' assessments of educators' strategies. Urban Education, 34, 338-369.
  7. Davidson, A., & Phelan, P. (1999). Students' multiple worlds. In Advances in motivation and achievement: Role of context, 2, 233-283.
  8. Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
  9. Hirst, P. H., & Peters, R. S. (1971). The logic of education. New York: Humanities Press.
  10. Kress, J. S., Norris, J. A., Schoenholz, D. A., Elias, M. J., & Seigle, P. (2004). Bringing together educational standards and social and emotional learning: Making the case for educators. American Journal of Education, 111, 68- 89. LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155-184.
  11. Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  12. Oser, F. K. (1994). Moral perspectives on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 57-127.
  13. Oser, F. K., Dick, A., & Patry, J. L. (1992). Responsibility, effectiveness, and the domains of educational research. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, and J. L. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 3-13).
  14. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Pianta, R. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Protheroe, N. (2005). Learning and the teacher-student connection. Principal, October/ September, 50-52.
  15. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
  16. Sockett, H. (1993). The moral base for teacher professionalism. New York: