Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1

Effects of clinical functional state on rehabilitation outcome in hemiplegic patients

Hemiplejik hastalarda klinik ve fonksiyonel durumun rehabilitasyon sonuçları üzerine etkisi

Pages
5–9
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Systemic diseases, complications and additional patologies were found to be major prognostic factors for functional independence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Hemiplegia is one of the most frequent causes of disability and mortality in elderly population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of our study was to identify factors affecting the improvement in functional status of hemiplegic patients. 25 hemiplegic patients (17 female, 8 male) were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Systemic diseases, complications and additional patologies were found to be major prognostic factors for functional independence.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Hemiplegia is one of the most frequent causes of disability and mortality in elderly population. However, validated and comprehensive prognostic models for recovery after stroke have not been developed. The aim of our study was to identify factors affecting the improvement in functional status of hemiplegic patients. 25 hemiplegic patients (17 female, 8 male) were included in this study. The patients were evaluated with respect to gender, age, site of involvement, etiologic factor, impairment in speech and sensation, systemic disease, complication and functional status. In addition, balance, ambulation level and motor functions according to Brunnstrom were assessed at admission and after a two- month rehabilitation. After rehabilitation program significant improvement was found in motor functions and functional status of the patients. Rehabilitation outcomes were not affected by the age, gender, etiology and involved side. Systemic diseases, complications and additional patologies were found to be major prognostic factors for functional independence.

Özet

Hemipleji, yaşlı nüfusta en sık karşılaşılan sakatlık ve ölüm nedenlerinden biridir. Bununla birlikte, iyileşme için geçerli ve kapsamlı bir prognostik model geliştirilememiştir. Çalışmamızın amacı, hemiplejik hastalarda fonksiyonel durumdaki iyileşmeyi etkileyen faktörleri belirlemekti. On yedisi kadın, 8'i erkek, toplam 25 subakut dönem hemiplejik hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalar yaş, cinsiyet, tutulan taraf, etiyolojik faktör, konuşma ve algı bozukluğu, denge, ambulasyon, sistemik hastalık, komplikasyon ve fonksiyonel durumlarına göre değerlendirildi. Hastaların tedavi öncesindeki ve 2 aylık rehabilitasyon sonrasındaki dengesi, ambulasyon seviyesi ve Brunnstrom'a göre motor fonksiyonları belirlendi. Rehabilitasyon programı sonunda, hastaların motor fonksiyonlarında ve fonksiyonel durumlarında anlamlı iyileşme tespit edildi. Rehabilitasyon sonuçları yaş, cinsiyet, tutulan taraf ve etiyolojiden etkilenmiyordu. Sistemik hastalıklar, komplikasyonlar ve ek patolojiler fonksiyonel bağımsızlık için majör prognostik faktörler olarak tespit edildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞLAM, Z., DEMİR, Y., BAHADIR, C., ÖNDER, C. B., KORKMAZ, Ö., GÜRER, N. (2022). Effects of clinical functional state on rehabilitation outcome in hemiplegic patients. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 1, 5–9. https://ajindex.com/articles/535608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Wolf PA. An overview of epidemiology of stroke. Stroke 1990;21:4-6. Fischer CM. Lacuner strokes and infarcts: A review. Neurology 1992;38:871-6.
  2. Henry JM, Barnett J, Mohr P et al. Stroke Pathophysiology, Di­ agnosis and Management. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone Inc; 1992:859-66.
  3. Kong KH, Chua KS, Tow AP. Clinical Characteristics and functional outcome of stroke patients 75 years old and older. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1535-9.
  4. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham GE. The stroke rehabiitation outcome study: Part I: General description. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:506-9.
  5. Rodriquez AA, Black PO, Kile KA et al. Gait training efficacy using a home-based practice model in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:801-5.
  6. Langenberghe V, Hogan EN. Degree of pain and grade of subluxation in the painful hemiplegic shoulder. Scand J Rehab Med 1988;20:161-6.
  7. Wolf SL, Binder-Macleod SA. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patients. Phys Ther 1983:63:1393-402.
  8. Inglis J, Donald MW. Elektromyographic biofeedback and physical therapy of the hemiplegic upper limb. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65:755-9.
  9. Thornton H, Jackson D, Turner-Stokes L Accuracy of predic­ tion of walking for young stroke patients by use of the FIM. Physiother Res Int 2001;6:1-14.
  10. Yılmaz H, Karaağaç N. Hemipleji sonrası rehabilitasyonda prognozu etkileyen faktörler. Romatol Tib Rehab 1994;5:84-9. Aktaş S. Yüzon hemiplejik olgunun klinik özellikleri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Tıp Bülteni 1992;24:943-9.
  11. Yavuzer G, Kucudeveci A, Araşıl T, Elhan A. Rehabilitation of stroke patients: clinical profile and functional outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:250-5.
  12. Ween JE, Alexander MP, D'esposito M, Roberts M. Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 1996:47:388-92.
  13. Weimar C, Ziegler A, Konig İR, Diener HC. Predicting functional outcome and survival after acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol 2002;249:888-95.
  14. Jeffrey S, Hecht MD. Subscapular nevre block in the painful hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:1036-9.
  15. Faghri PD, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM et al. The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery and shoulder pain in the hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1994;75:73-9.
  16. Davenport RJ, Dennis MS. Complications after acute stroke. Stroke 1996:27:415-20.
  17. Lai SM, Alter M. Prognosis for survival after an initial stroke. Stroke 1995:26:2011-5.
  18. You RX, McNeil JJ. Risk factors f