Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of 5% ropivacaine with 5% bupivacaine applied epidurally for hip and lower extremity orthopedic surgery

Kalça ve alt ektremite ortopedik cerrahisinde epidural %0.5 bupivakain ve %0.5 ropivakainin karşılaştırılması

Pages
92–98
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, it's concluded that ropivacaine, which causes small decreases that do not affect the haemodynamic stability and which has similar sensorial block properties with bupivacaine, can be a good alternative to bupivaca­ine especially in the operations in which motor block de­velopment is not preferred.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In our study, 44 patients, ASA l-lll, undergoing electi­ve hip and lower extremity orthopedic surgery were com­pared for sensorial, motor block and haemodynamic changes that occured after receiving 20 ml_ of 0.5% bu­pivacaine or 20 ml_ of 0.5% ropivacaine extradurally.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The onset time of anaesthesia, spreading time on the T10 dermatome, maximum high level block, spreading ti­me to maximum high level block, 2 dermatome regration time were similar in both groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, it's concluded that ropivacaine, which causes small decreases that do not affect the haemodynamic stability and which has similar sensorial block properties with bupivacaine, can be a good alternative to bupivaca­ine especially in the operations in which motor block de­velopment is not preferred.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In our study, 44 patients, ASA l-lll, undergoing electi­ve hip and lower extremity orthopedic surgery were com­pared for sensorial, motor block and haemodynamic changes that occured after receiving 20 ml_ of 0.5% bu­pivacaine or 20 ml_ of 0.5% ropivacaine extradurally. The onset time of anaesthesia, spreading time on the T10 dermatome, maximum high level block, spreading ti­me to maximum high level block, 2 dermatome regration time were similar in both groups. The onset time and deg­ree of motor block did not differ between the groups. Af­ter the epidural injection in the ropivacaine group, after 20 minutes systolic blood pressure was significantly lower than the first measurements; after 10 minutes mean arte­rial pressure was significantly lower than the basal valu­es. In the bupivacaine group, haemodynamic measure­ments were similar with the basal values. Heart rate chan­ges were similar between the groups. There was no sta­tistically significant difference between the groups for si­de effects. Finally, it's concluded that ropivacaine, which causes small decreases that do not affect the haemodynamic stability and which has similar sensorial block properties with bupivacaine, can be a good alternative to bupivaca­ine especially in the operations in which motor block de­velopment is not preferred.

Özet

Çalışmamızda, kalça ve alt ekstremite ortopedik cer­rahisi planlanan ASA l-ll-lll fiziki statusta 44 hasta, %0.5 bupivakain ve %0.5 ropivakainin epidural uygulanması sonucu oluşan duyusal ve motor blok ile hemodinamik değişiklikler açısından karşılaştırıldı. Her iki grupta da anestezinin başlama süresi, T10 dermatomuna ulaşma süresi, tepe noktası dermatomu, tepe noktası dermatomuna ulaşma süresi, 2 dermatom gerileme süresi ve toplam anestezi süresi benzer bulun­du. Yine iki grup arasında motor bloğun oluşma süreleri ve oluşan motor blok dereceleri açısından anlamlı farklılık yoktu. Epidural enjeksiyonu takiben %0.5 ropivakain gru­bunda SAB değerleri 20. dk'dan ve OAB değerleri 10. dk'dan itibaren bazal değerlere göre düşük seyrederken (p0.05). KAH'larda ise hem ba­zal değerlerle hem de iki grup birbirleri ile karşılaştırıldı­ğında istatistiksel olarak farklılık gözlenmedi (p>0.05). Yan etki insidansları açısından da gruplar arasında farklı­lık yoktu. Sonuç olarak, SAB, OAB ve KAH'larda hemodinamik stabiliteyi etkilemeyecek oranda düşmelere neden olan, ancak duyusal blok profili açısından bupivakaine benzer özellikler gösteren ropivakainin, özellikle motor blok geliş­mesinin istenmediği operasyonlarda bupivakaine iyi bir alternatif olabileceği kanaatine varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN, G., AYDIN, N., YANIK, V. S. (2022). Comparison of 5% ropivacaine with 5% bupivacaine applied epidurally for hip and lower extremity orthopedic surgery. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 92–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/535606

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Özatamer O, Alkış N, Batislam Y. Epidural Anestezi. Anestezi­de Güncel Konular. Istanbul. Nobel Matbaacılık. 350-7
  2. Esener Z. Epidural Anestezi. Klinik Anestezi. İkinci baskı.Samsun. Logos Yayıncılık. 403-25
  3. Sztark F, Malgat M, Dabadie P et ai. Comparison of effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine on heart cell mitochondrial bioenergetics. Anesthesiology 1998;88:1340-9
  4. Gautier P, Kock MD, Van Steenberge A et al. A double- blind comparison with sufentanil and %0.125 bupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural labor analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:772-8
  5. Fischer C, Blanie P, Jaouen E et al. Ropivacaine %0.1 plus sufentanil 0.5 mg/ml, versus bupivacaine %0.1 plus sufenta­nil 0.5 mg/ml, using patient controlled epidural analgesia for labor. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1588-93
  6. Turner G, Blake D, Buckland M et al. Continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine for prevention of postoperative pain after major orthopaedic surgery. Br J Anaesth 1996;76:606-10
  7. Polley LS, Columb MO, Noughton NN et al. Relative analge­sic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor. Anesthesiology 1990;90:944-50
  8. Concepcion M, Steeie S, BaderA et al. Comparison of %0.75 ropivacain and %0.75 bupivacain for epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1990;73:3A
  9. Owen M, Dean LS. Ropivacaine. Central and Peripheral Ner­vous System. Asley Publications. 1 (2). 325-36
  10. Morrison LMM, Emanuelsson BM, McClure JH et al. Efficacy and kinetics of extradural ropivacain. Comparison with bupi­vacaine. BrJ Anaesth 1994;72:164-9
  11. Griffin R, Reynold F. Extradural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a double-blind comparison of %0.5 ropivacaine with %0.5 bupivacaine. BrJ Anaesth 1995;74:512-6
  12. Crosby E, Sandier A, Finucane B et al. Comparison ofepidural anaesthesia with ropivacaine %0.5 and bupivacaine %0.5 for caesarean section. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 1998;45:No 11
  13. Brown DL, Carpenter RL, Thomson GE. Comparison of %0.5 ropivacaine and %0.5 bupivacaine for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing lower extremity surgery. Anesthesiology 1990;72:633-6
  14. Datta S, Camann W, BaderA et al. Clinical effects and mater­nal and fetal plasma concentrations of epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean section. Anesthesilogy 1995;82:1346-52
  15. Ağrıtmış A, Türeci E, Yentür E. Epidural anestezide ropivakain, bupivakain ve lokal anestezik-fentanil kombinasyonları ile duyusal ve motor blok: randomize çalışma. Türk Anest Rean Cem Mecmu