Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4

Glikozile hemoglobin A1c üzerine yaşın etkisi

The effect of age on glycated hemoglobin A1c

Pages
440–444
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Older age non-diabetic population, even below conventionally defined diabetic thresholds, have higher fasting plasma glucose and secondary to this higher glycated hemoglobin A1 c values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Previous studies investigating effect of age on glycated hemoglobin A1c value have yielded inconsistent findings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We investigated effect of age on glycated hemoglobin A1c in Turkish population with normal glycose tolerance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Older age non-diabetic population, even below conventionally defined diabetic thresholds, have higher fasting plasma glucose and secondary to this higher glycated hemoglobin A1 c values.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Previous studies investigating effect of age on glycated hemoglobin A1c value have yielded inconsistent findings. We investigated effect of age on glycated hemoglobin A1c in Turkish population with normal glycose tolerance. Material and method: This prospective study were carried out in 55 subjects with normal glycose tolerance according to 1997 American Diabetes Association criterion by oral glycose tolerance test. The subjects were dichotomised by median value for age (45> and < 45 years), and levels of fasting and 2nd hour postlo-ad plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin A1c of these subgroups were compared. Results: The subjects who have equal or higher 45 years (n=28) had statistically significant higher glycated hemoglobin A1c and fasting venous plasma glycose levels than the those who have less than 45 years (n=27) (5.90±0.51 vs 5.58±0.52, p=0.025 and 97.25±5.47 vs 91.59±9.40 mg/dL, p=0.008, respectively). When all 55 patients were assessed as a whole, statistically significant positive correlations were found between fasting venous plasma glycose and age (r=0.446, p=0.001), glycated hemoglobin A1c (r=0.419, p=0.001), body mass index (r=0,273, p=0,044) values. In regression analysis, the only factor affecting glycated hemoglobin A1c levels was found to be fasting venous plasma glycose levels (r2=0.175, p=0.001). Conclusion: Older age non-diabetic population, even below conventionally defined diabetic thresholds, have higher fasting plasma glucose and secondary to this higher glycated hemoglobin A1 c values.

Özet

Amaç: Glikozile hemoglobin A1c değeri üzerine yaşın etkisini araştıran çalışmaların sonuçları uyumsuzdur. Biz normal glikoz toleransı olan Türk toplumunda glikozile hemoglobin A1c üzerine yaşın etkisini araştırdık. Materyal ve metod: Bu prospektif çalışma 1997 Amerikan Diabet Cemiyeti kriterlerine göre oral glikoz tolerans testi ile normal glikoz toleransı olan toplam 55 kişide yapıldı. Bu kişiler median yaşa göre 2 alt gruba (45> ve

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, A., KÜLBAY, H. (2022). Glikozile hemoglobin A1c üzerine yaşın etkisi. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 4, 440–444. https://ajindex.com/articles/535580

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Peters AL, Davidson MB, Schriger DL, Hasselblad V. A clinical approach for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: an analysis using glycosylated hemoglobin levels: Meta-analysis Research Group on the Diagnosis of Diabetes Using Glycated Hemoglobin Levels. JAMA. 1996; 276(15):1246-52. 2.Guerci B, Durain D, Leblanc H, et al. Multicentre evaluation of the DCA 2000 system for measuring glycated haemoglobin. DCA 2000 study group. Diabetes Metab 1997; 23(3) -.195-201. 3.Rohlfing CL, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, et al. Use ofGHb (HbA1c) in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the U.S. population. Diabetes Care 2000; 23(2).187-191. 4.Wiener K, Roberts NB. The relative merits of haemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose as first line diagnostic tests for diabetes mellitus in non-pregnant subjects. Diabet Med 1998; 15(7):558 -563. 5.McCance DR, Hanson RL, Charles MA, et al. Comparison of tests for glycated haemoglobin and fasting and two hour plasma glucose concentrations as diagnostic methods for diabetes. BMJ1994; 308:1323 -28. 6.Jesudason DR, Dunstan K, Leong D, Wittert GA. Macrovascular Risk and Diagnostic Criteria for Type 2 Diabetes Implications for the use of FPG and HbA1c for cost-effective screening. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(2): 485-90. 7.Kilpatrick ES, Dominiczak MH, Small M. The effects of ageing on glycation and the interpretation ofglycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes. QJM 1996; 89(4):307-12. 8.Arnetz BB, Kallner A, Theorell T. The influence of aging on haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). J Gerontol 1982; 37(6):648-50. 9.Simon D, Senan C, Gamier P, et al. Epidemiological features of glycated haemoglobin A1c distribution in a healthy population. The Telecom Study. Diabetologia 1989; 32(12):864-9. 10.Utzschneider KM, Carr DB, Hull RL, etal. Impact of intra-abdominal fat and age on insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function. Diabetes. 2004;53(11):2867-72. 11.Kabadi UM. Glycosylation of proteins. Lack of influence of aging. Diabetes Care 1988; 11:429-32. 12.Wiener K, Roberts NB. Age does not influence levels of HbA1c in normal subject. QJM. 1999, 92(3):169-73. 13.Gavin JR. New classification and diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus. Clin Cornerstone. 1998;1(3):1-12. 14.Chiu KC, Lee NP, Cohan P, Chuang LM. Beta cell function declines with age in glucose tolerant Caucasians. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2000; 53(5)^69-75. 15.Chiu KC, Martinez DS, Chu A. Comparison of the relationship of age and beta cell function in three ethnic groups. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005; 62(3)29