SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2

The comparison of lay-open, karydakis flap and Limberg flap techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery abstract

Pilonidal sinüs cerrahisinde açık bırakma, karydakis flep ve Limberg flep yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması

Ethem ÜNAL
Aziz OCAKOĞLU
Pages
74–78
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA (post hoc Tukey-HSD) test, and p0.05), healing process was seen to be longer for group 1 in comparison to the other groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of laying open, Karydakis flap and Limberg flap techniques used in our patients with pilonidal sinus disease and to discuss our findings with current literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and metod: Patients operated for pilonidal disease between January 2008 and December 2009 were evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA (post hoc Tukey-HSD) test, and p0.05), healing process was seen to be longer for group 1 in comparison to the other groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of laying open, Karydakis flap and Limberg flap techniques used in our patients with pilonidal sinus disease and to discuss our findings with current literature. Patients and metod: Patients operated for pilonidal disease between January 2008 and December 2009 were evaluated. Medical records were investigated for demographics, operative technique applied, hospitalization period, complications and recurrences. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA (post hoc Tukey-HSD) test, and p0.05), healing process was seen to be longer for group 1 in comparison to the other groups (p

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı pilonidal sinüs ameliyatları nda kullanmakta olduğumuz açık bırakma, Karydakis ve Limberg flep yöntemlerinden elde ettiğimiz sonuçları incelemek ve güncel literatür eşliğinde tartışmaktır. Hastalar ve metod: Ocak 2008-Aralık 2009 arası dönemde pilonidal sinüs nedeniyle ameliyat ettiğimiz hastalar değerlendirmeye alındı. Hastaları n dosyaları taranarak demografik özellikleri, uygulanan ameliyat tekniği, hastanede kalış süreleri, postoperatif komplikasyonları ve nüks oranları belirlendi. İstatistiksel değerlendirme ANOVA (post hoc Tukey-HSD) yöntemi ile yapıldı; p0.05), grup 1 de yaranın kapanması için geçen süre diğer gruplara oranla belirgin olarak uzun bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNAL, E., OCAKOĞLU, A. (2022). The comparison of lay-open, karydakis flap and Limberg flap techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery abstract. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 52 - Sayı: 2, 74–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/535402

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Humphries AE, Duncan JE. Evaluation and management of pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:113-24
  2. Doll D, Krueger CM, Schrank S, Dettmann H, Petersen S, Duesel W. Timeline of recurrence after primary and secondary pilonidal sinus surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1928-34
  3. Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7:3-8
  4. Can MF, Sevinc MM, Hancerliogullari O, Yilmaz M, Yagci G. Multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing modified Limberg flap transposition and Karydakis flap reconstruction in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Am J Surg. 2010;200:318-27
  5. Can MF, Sevinc MM, Yilmaz M. Comparison of Karydakis flap reconstruction versus primary midline closure in sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: results of 200 military service members. Surg Today 2009;39:580-6
  6. Khaira HS, Brown JH. Excision and primary suture of pilonidal sinus. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995;77:242-4
  7. Gencosmanoglu R, Inceoglu R. Modified lay-open (incision, curettage, partial lateral wall excision and marsupialization) versus total excision with primary closure in the treatment of chronic sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with a complete two-year follow-up. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20:415-22
  8. Perruchoud C, Vuilleumier H, Givel JC. Pilonidal sinus: how to choose between excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure? Study of a series of 141 patients operated on from 1991 to 1995. Swiss Surg. 2002;8:255-8
  9. Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet 1973;22:1414-5
  10. Keshava A, Young CJ, Rickard MJ, Sinclair G. Karydakis flap repair for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: how important is technique? ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:181-3
  11. Çetinkaya Z, Bülbüller N, Doğru O, Çifter Ç, Çetiner M, Akkufl MA. Pilonidal sinüsün cerrahi tedavisinde Limberg flep ile Karydakis flep yöntemlerinin karfl›laflt›r›lmas›. Kolon Rektum Hast Derg. 1999;9:26-9.