Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2

Rochallscoring system in acute nonvaricealupper gastrointestinal bleeding and its association with prognosis

Varis dışı akut üst gastrointestinalsistem kanamalarındarockallskorlaması ve skorlamanın prognozlaolan ilişkisi

Pages
107–113
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Duration of hospitalization accordingto Rochall Scoring System (2,83 days in score 1;3,65 days in score 2; 4,15 days in score 3; 5,12days in score 4; 5,83 days in score 5; 7 days inscore 6; 11,1 days in score 7), mean number oftransfusions (2,29 units for score 1; 2,20 unitsfor score 2; 3,06 units in score 3; 3,08 units inscore 5; 3,67 units for score 6; 5,25 units forscore 7; 6,50 units for score 8; 14 units for score11), number of endoscopic treatment procedures(1 in score 1; 1 in score 2; 2 in score 3; 3 in score 5; 6 in score 7) rose as Rochall score increased.CONCLUSION: We concluded that Rochall scoring system is useful in predicting prognosis andmortality of inpatients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and it is feasible inclinical practice .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION: In this study we aimed to investigate the correlation in prognosis of patients hospitalized with diagnosis of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding classified according to Rochall Scoring System and its clinicalutility.METHODS: 111 Patients who were older than 16years old and hospitalized in internal medicineclinics for acute novariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding were enrolled to the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Duration ofhospitalization, number of blood transfusions,number of people treated endoscopically andsurgically was noted.RESULTS: Number of women was 42(%38) andmen was 69 (%62) in total 111 patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Duration of hospitalization accordingto Rochall Scoring System (2,83 days in score 1;3,65 days in score 2; 4,15 days in score 3; 5,12days in score 4; 5,83 days in score 5; 7 days inscore 6; 11,1 days in score 7), mean number oftransfusions (2,29 units for score 1; 2,20 unitsfor score 2; 3,06 units in score 3; 3,08 units inscore 5; 3,67 units for score 6; 5,25 units forscore 7; 6,50 units for score 8; 14 units for score11), number of endoscopic treatment procedures(1 in score 1; 1 in score 2; 2 in score 3; 3 in score 5; 6 in score 7) rose as Rochall score increased.CONCLUSION: We concluded that Rochall scoring system is useful in predicting prognosis andmortality of inpatients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and it is feasible inclinical practice .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study we aimed to investigate the correlation in prognosis of patients hospitalized with diagnosis of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding classified according to Rochall Scoring System and its clinicalutility.METHODS: 111 Patients who were older than 16years old and hospitalized in internal medicineclinics for acute novariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding were enrolled to the study. All of thepatients admitted to emergency department andhospitalized. Patients clinical caharacteristics,admittance complaints, physical examinationfindings, endoscopic findings, mediacations, comorbid illnesses, laboratory data and endoscopictreatment methods were recorded. Duration ofhospitalization, number of blood transfusions,number of people treated endoscopically andsurgically was noted.RESULTS: Number of women was 42(%38) andmen was 69 (%62) in total 111 patients. The medium age was 64,21 years in women; 55,42 years in men and was 58,74 years totally. 2 patients died. Duration of hospitalization accordingto Rochall Scoring System (2,83 days in score 1;3,65 days in score 2; 4,15 days in score 3; 5,12days in score 4; 5,83 days in score 5; 7 days inscore 6; 11,1 days in score 7), mean number oftransfusions (2,29 units for score 1; 2,20 unitsfor score 2; 3,06 units in score 3; 3,08 units inscore 5; 3,67 units for score 6; 5,25 units forscore 7; 6,50 units for score 8; 14 units for score11), number of endoscopic treatment procedures(1 in score 1; 1 in score 2; 2 in score 3; 3 in score 5; 6 in score 7) rose as Rochall score increased.CONCLUSION: We concluded that Rochall scoring system is useful in predicting prognosis andmortality of inpatients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and it is feasible inclinical practice .

Özet

GİRİŞ VE AMAÇ: Varis dışı akut üst gastrointestinal sistem (GİS) kanaması öntanısıyla yatırılan,Rockall skorlama sistemine göre sınıflanan hastaların prognozlarının bu sınıflama sistemi ile korelasyonunu ve bu sistemin klinik kullanılabilirliğini araştırmayı amaçladık.HASTALAR VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmamıza, hastanemiz iç hastalıkları servisinevaris dışı akutüst GİS kanama tanısıyla yatırılan 16 yaş veüzeri 111 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların tamamıayaktan başvuran ve yatarak tedavi edilen hastalardı.Hastaların genel özellikleri, başvuru şikayetleri, fizik muayene bulguları, endoskopi bulguları, eşlik eden hastalıkları, kullandıkları ilaçlar,laboratuar bulguları ve endoskopik tedavisi kaydedildi. Hastanede yatış süresi, yapılan kantransfüzyonu miktarı, endoskopik ve/veya cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hasta sayıları kaydedildi.BULGULAR: Çalışmaya alınan 111 hastanın %38i (42) kadın, %62si (69) erkekti. Yaş ortalamaları kadınlarda 64,21 yıl, erkeklerde 55,42 yılve toplam hastada 58,74 yıl idi.Hastalardan 2 tanesi ex oldu. Rockall skoruna göre hastaların ortalama yatış süresi (Rockall 1de 2,83 gün; 2de 3,56 gün; 3de 4,15 gün; 4de 5,12 gün; 5de5,83 gün; 6da 7 gün; 7de 11,13 gün), ortalamaeritrosit süspansiyonu replasmanı sayısı (Rockall 1de 2,29 ünite; 2de 2,20 ünite; 3de 3,06ünite; 5de 3,08 ünite; 6da 3,67 ünite; 7de 5,25ünite; 8de 6,50 ünite; 11de 14 ünite), endoskopik müdahale sayısı (Rockall 1de 1; 2de 1; 3de2; 5de 3; 7de 6 müdahale) olup bu parametrelerRockall skoru artışı ile paralel artış göstermiştir. SONUÇ : Rockall skorlama sisteminin varis dışıakut üst gastrointestinal kanama tanısı ile klinikte takip edilen hastaların prognoz ve mortalitelerini belirlemede yararlı,klinik uygulamada kullanılabilir bir sistem olduğunu gördük.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYATAŞ, K., BERBER, E., ULUKÖYLÜ, M., DEMİRTUNÇ, R. (2022). Rochallscoring system in acute nonvaricealupper gastrointestinal bleeding and its association with prognosis. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 53 - Sayı: 2, 107–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/535364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Jutabha R, Jensen DM: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Current Diagnosis & Treatment in Gastroenterology (Friedman SL, McQuaid KR, Grendell JH ed). Second ed. New York, McGraw-Hill Co, 53–69, 2003
  2. Tuncer MM:Gastrointestinal Sistem Kanamaları.Cerrahpaşa İç Hastalıkları (Yazıcı H, Hamuryudan V, Sonsuz A, ed). stanbul, İstanbul Medikal Yayıncılık, 800-805, 2007
  3. Barkun A, Bardou M, Marshall JK: Consensus recommendations for managing patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann İntern Med, 2003; 139(10): 843
  4. Cullen DJ, Hawkey GM, Greenwood DC, et al. Peptic ulcer bleeding in the elderly:relative roles of Helicobacter pylori and non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Gut, 1997; 41: 459
  5. Henriksson AE, Edman AC, Nilsson I, et al. Helicobacter pylori and the relation to other risk factors in patients with acute bleeding peptic ulcer. Scand J Gastroenterol, 1998; 33: 1030
  6. Skok P, Skok M. Upper Gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and nonsteroidalantiinflamatory drugs- A5-years prospective study. Zdrav Vestn, 2002; 71: 153
  7. De Caestecker J. Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Surgical Perspective Medicine, 2002; 9: 1 8. Oh DS, Pisegna JR. Management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Fam Pract, 2004; 6(3): 631
  8. British Society of Gastroenterology Endoscopy Committee. Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: guidelines, Gut; 2002; 51: 1
  9. Longstreth GF. Epidemiology and outcome of patients hospitalized with acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol, 1997; 92: 419
  10. Rockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin Hb, et al. Risk assesment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Gut 1996; 38: 316
  11. Blatchford O, Murray W, Blatchford M. Arisk score to predict need for treatment for upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 2000; 356: 1318
  12. Saeed Z, Ramirez F, Hepps K, et al. Prospective validation of the Baylor bleeding score for predicting the likelihood of rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis of pepticulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41: 561
  13. Hay J, Lyubashevsky E, Elashoff J, et al. Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage clinical guideline: determining the optimal hospital length of stay. Am J Med 1996; 100: 313
  14. Silverstein FE, Gilbert DA, Tedeaco FJ, et al. The national ASGE survey on upper gastrointestinal bleeding. II. Clinical prognostic factors. Gastrointest Endosc 1981; 27: 80
  15. Di Fiore F, Lecleire S,Merl V, et al.Changes in characteristics and o