Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 3

POSTANESTHETİC CARE UNIT (PACU): ITS DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNIFICANCE

POSTANESTEZİK BAKIM ÜNİTESİ (PABÜ): GELİŞİMİ VE STANDARTLARI

Pages
191–196
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review the historical development and standards of PACU has been tried to summarized.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The growing demand for intensive care units (ICU) in a wide range of patient groups may lead to limitations in capacity of ICU.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These limitations may lead to delays in patient acceptance from the emergency departments and intensive care units along with increased mortality and morbidity; and may cause postponement of elective surgical operations which have postoperative intensive care indication.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review the historical development and standards of PACU has been tried to summarized.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The growing demand for intensive care units (ICU) in a wide range of patient groups may lead to limitations in capacity of ICU. These limitations may lead to delays in patient acceptance from the emergency departments and intensive care units along with increased mortality and morbidity; and may cause postponement of elective surgical operations which have postoperative intensive care indication. Reasons like higher costs of intensive care, increase in diversity and number of surgical procedures, increasing number of surgical interventions in elder patients with concomitant comorbidities required a special postoperative care unit. Postanesthetic care unit (PACU) has been established and developed to make the necessary interventions and the closer short-term intensive monitoring of patients after surgery and anesthesia. In this review the historical development and standards of PACU has been tried to summarized.

Özet

Yoğun bakım üniteleri (YBÜ) için, farklı hasta gruplarından geniş bir yelpaze içerisinde artan talepler, yoğun bakım ünitelerinin kapasitelerinde sınırlamalara yol açabilir. Bu sınırlamalar artmış mortalite ve morbiditeyle beraber acil servisten hasta kabulünde gecikmelere ve yoğun bakım endikasyonu konulmuş, elektif cerrahi için bekleyen cerrahi olguların operasyon süreçlerinde ertelenmelere neden olabilir. Yoğun bakım maliyetlerinin yüksek oluşu, cerrahi işlemlerin sayı ve çeşitliliğinin çoğalması, yandaş hastalıkları olan, daha yaşlı olguların cerrahi girişimlerinin giderek artması gibi nedenler özel erken postoperatif bakım ünitelerine ihtiyaç duyulmasına neden olmaktadır. Bu amaçla postanestezik bakım ünitesi (PABÜ), hastalara cerrahi ve anestezi sonrası gerekli müdahalelerin yapılması ve olguların kısa süreli yakın ve yoğun izlenmesi için kurulmuş ve geliştirilmiştir. Bu derlememizde PABÜ'nün tarihsel gelişimi ve standartları özetlenmeye çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖMÜR, D., İNAL, D. G. G., HANCI, V. (2022). POSTANESTHETİC CARE UNIT (PACU): ITS DEVELOPMENT AND SIGNIFICANCE. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 3, 191–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/535286

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Postanesthetic Care. Practice guidelines for postanest- hetic care: a report by the American Society of Anest- hesiologists Task Force on Postanesthetic Care. Anest- hesiology 2002;96(3):742-52.
  2. Hancı V, Pişkin Ö. Geriatrik Anestezide Derlenme ve Postoperatif Bakım. Turkiye Klinikleri J Anest Rea- nim-Special Topics 2011;4(1):52-9.
  3. Morgan GE, Mikail MS, Murray MJ. Postanesthesia Care. In: Morgan GE, Mikail MS, Murray MJ (eds.) Clini- cal Anesthesiology. 3rd edition. New York, Lange Medi- cal Books/ McGraw-Hill. 2002 p: 936-950. McGoldrick KE. Anesthesia Considerations for Geriatric Outpatients. In: Silverstein JH, Rooke GA, Reves JG, Mcleskey CH (eds). Geriatric Anesthesiology. 2nd editi- on., New York, Springer science+Business Media, 2008 p: 322-337. Membership of the Working Party:, Whitaker Chair DK, Booth H, Clyburn P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Hosie H, Kilvin- gton B, Macmahon M, Smedley P, Verma R; Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Immedi- ate post-anaesthesia recovery 2013: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia 2013;68(3):288-97.
  4. Vimlati L, Gilsanz F, Goldik Z. Quality and safety guide- lines of postanaesthesia care: Working Party on Post Anaesthesia Care (approved by the European Board and Section of Anaesthesiology, Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes). Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009;26(9): 715-21.
  5. Barone CP, Pablo CS, Barone GW. A history of the PACU. J Perianesth Nurs 2003;18(4):237-41. Zuck D. Anaesthetic and postoperative recovery ro- oms. Some notes on their early history. Anaesthesia 1995;50(5):435-8.
  6. Allen A, Badgwell JM. The post anesthesia care unit: unique contribution, unique risk. J Perianesth Nurs 1996;11(4):248-58. American Society of Anesthesiologists - Standards & Guidelines. ( 2014, 15 Ekim) American Society of Anest- hesiologists - Standards & Guidelines. Erişim tarihi: 21 Kasım 2015, http://www.asahq.org/quality-and-practi- ce-management/standards-and-guidelines. Apfelbaum JL, Silverstein JH, Chung FF, Connis RT, Fil- lmore RB, Hunt SE, Nickinovich DG, Schreiner MS, Sil- verstein JH, Apfelbaum JL, Barlow JC, Chung FF, Con- nis RT, Fillmore RB, Hunt SE, Joas TA, Nickinovich DG, Schreiner MS; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Postanesthetic Care. Practice guidelines for postanesthetic care: an updated report by the Ame- rican Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Posta- nesthetic Care. Anesthesiology 2013