Journals / Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2

ADNEKSİYAL KİTLELERİN PREOPERATİF ÖNGÖRÜSÜNDE MALİGNİTE RİSK İNDEKSİ HESAPLAMALARI VE IOTA KURALLARI

Pages
113–121
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With this review,we up to date developments in the diagnosis and triage of adnexal masses which frequently encountered in daily prac-tice and we aimed to evaluate dilemmas in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ovarian cancer is the fifth reason of women death because of cancer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the purpose of early diagnosis and true triage of the patients to the right centers , clinicians had worked on different diagnostic metho-ds.Today, for evaluation of the premeno-pausal patients IOTA group defends models that based on ultrasonografic findings; on the other hand Risk Of Malignancy Indices (RMI 1,2,3,4) are thought to have diagnostic accurancy in postmenopausal group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With this review,we up to date developments in the diagnosis and triage of adnexal masses which frequently encountered in daily prac-tice and we aimed to evaluate dilemmas in the literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the fifth reason of women death because of cancer. According to World Health Organization criteria, ovarian cancer is in group of cancers which can not benefit from screening tests. Unfortunately because of nonspecific clinical findings, ovarian cancer can be diagnosed in late stages. For the purpose of early diagnosis and true triage of the patients to the right centers , clinicians had worked on different diagnostic metho-ds.Today, for evaluation of the premeno-pausal patients IOTA group defends models that based on ultrasonografic findings; on the other hand Risk Of Malignancy Indices (RMI 1,2,3,4) are thought to have diagnostic accurancy in postmenopausal group. With this review,we up to date developments in the diagnosis and triage of adnexal masses which frequently encountered in daily prac-tice and we aimed to evaluate dilemmas in the literature.

Özet

Over kanserleri kadın ölümlerinde 5. sırada yer almaktadır. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü'nün kriterlerine göre over kanseri tarama testlerinden fayda sağlayamayan kanser grubundadır. Klinik bulguları nonspesifik olan ve ne yazık ki ileri evrelerde tanı alabilen bu kanser grubunun erken tanı alabilmesi ve hastaların doğru merkezlere yönlendirilebilmesi için klinisyenler farklı yöntemler üzerinde çalışmışlardır. Günümüzde premenopozal dönemdeki hastaların değerlendirilmesinde IOTA ekibinin ultrasonografik değerlendirmeye yönelik modelleri doğru triajı sağladığı savunulurken, Malignite Risk Indeksi (RMI 1,2,3,4) modellerinin ise postmenopozal dönemde tanısal değeri olduğu düşünülmektedir. Biz bu derlemede günlük pratikte sıkça karşılaştığımız adneksiyel kitlelerin tanı ve triajında günümüze kadar yaşanan gelişmeleri ve yaşanılan ikilemleri literatür eşliğinde değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKA, N., VURAL, F., ERTAŞ, S. (2022). ADNEKSİYAL KİTLELERİN PREOPERATİF ÖNGÖRÜSÜNDE MALİGNİTE RİSK İNDEKSİ HESAPLAMALARI VE IOTA KURALLARI. Haydarpaşa Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 2, 113–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/535265

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Günalp S, Yüce K, Ayhan A. Temel Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Bilgisi 2014;268. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics,2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014; 64:9-29.
  2. Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney AF, Nygaard I, Danfort's Obstetrics and Gynecology,2010; 1061. 4. Eisenkop SM, Spirtos NM, Montag TW et al. The impact of subspeciality on the management of advanced ovari- an cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1991;47:203-9. 5. Kehoe S, Powell J, Wilson S, Woodman C. The influence of the operating surgeons specialisation on patient sur- vival in ovarian carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1994;70:1014- 7. Elit L, Bondy SJ, Paszat L, Przybysz R, Levine M. Out- comes in surgery for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2002;87:260-7
  3. Menon U, Jacobs IJ. Ovarian cancer screening in the general population: current status. Int J Gynecol Can- cer 2001;11:3-6.
  4. Bast Jr RC, Badgwell D, Lu Z, Marquez R, Rosen D, Liu J, et al. New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005;15:274-81.
  5. Ulusoy S, Akbayır O, Numanoğlu C, Ulusoy N, Oda- bas E, Gulkilik A. The risk of malignacy index in disc- rimination of adnexal masses. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2007;96:186-91.
  6. Granberg S, Wikland M, Jansson I: Macroskopic cha- racterization of ovarian tumors and the relation to the histological diagnosis: Criteria to be used for ultrason evaluation. Gynecol Oncol35:139-144,1989.
  7. Sassone A, Timor-Tritsch I, Artner A, Westhoff C, Warren W: Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovari- an diseasee: evaluation of a new scoring system to pre- dict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:70-6.
  8. Depriest PD, Van Nagel Jr, Gallion HH, et al: Ovarian cancer screening in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol 1993;51:205-209.
  9. Alcazar JL, Lopez-Garcia G: Transvaginal color doppler assesment of venous flow in adnexal masses. Ultra- sound Obstet Gynecol 2001;17:434-8.
  10. Alcazar JL, Merce TL, Laparte C, Jurada M, Lopez - Garcia G: A new scoring system to differentiate benign from malignant adnexal masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;186:685-92.
  11. Aggarwal P, Kehoe S. Serum tumour markers in gynae- cological cancers. Maturitas.2010;67:46-53.
  12. Gadduci A, Ferdeghini M, Prontera C, Moretti L, Mairana G, Bianchi R, et al. The concominant determination of different tumour markers in patients with epithelial ova- rian cancer and benign ovarian masses: relevance for differential diagnosis. Gynecol Oncol.1992;44:147-154.
  13. Ozols RF, Rubin SC, Thomas GM, Robboy SJ. Epithelial ovarian cancer.In: Hoskins WJ,Perez CA, Young R, Ba- rak