Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Participation and participatory extension in rural development

Kırsal kalkınmada katılımcılık ve katılımcı yayım

Pages
17–27
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, in this article, development of participatory approaches in the world, importance of participation for rural development, types/stages of participation, examples of participatory extension and its importance for Turkish agricultural extension are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Participatory approach should be employed in every sector of rural development efforts; however, it is thought that it is of crucial importance for agriculture which is the priory income source of rural communities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is thought that participatory extension helps to improve the effects of trainning and extension activities of sustainable learning cycle in rural communities and the success of agricultural extension activities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, in this article, development of participatory approaches in the world, importance of participation for rural development, types/stages of participation, examples of participatory extension and its importance for Turkish agricultural extension are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Participatory approach should be employed in every sector of rural development efforts; however, it is thought that it is of crucial importance for agriculture which is the priory income source of rural communities. It is thought that participatory extension helps to improve the effects of trainning and extension activities of sustainable learning cycle in rural communities and the success of agricultural extension activities. In this context, in this article, development of participatory approaches in the world, importance of participation for rural development, types/stages of participation, examples of participatory extension and its importance for Turkish agricultural extension are discussed.

Özet

Katılımcı yaklaşım, genel kırsal kalkınma çabaları içinde yer alan her sektörde ve proje aşamasında kullanılabilir. Ancak, kırsal hanelerin temel geçim kaynağı olan tarım sektöründe kullanılması bu sektördeki eğitim ve yayım faaliyetlerinin etkisini arttırarak, hedef kitle tarafından istenen, desteklenen, ve sürdürülebilir bir öğrenme sürecine yol açacaktır. Bu yazıda, özellikle Türkiye'de katılımcı yaklaşımın gelişiminin tarımsal yayım faaliyetleri üzerinde güçlendirici bir etki yaratabileceği düşüncesi ile; katılımcılığın gelişimi, neden gerekli olduğu, türleri ve temel bileşenleri ele alındıktan sonra katılımcılık ve katılımcı yayımla ilgili bazı uluslar arası tecrübeler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZER, D. (2022). Participation and participatory extension in rural development. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 17–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/534700

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Adhikarya, R. 1994. Strategic extension campaign-A participatory-oriented method of agricultural extension. FAO Publications. No. M-67, Rome, 127 sayfa. http://www.fao.org/docrep/U8955E/U8955E00.htm Anonim. 1996.
  2. The power of participation, Policy Briefing, Issue 7. www.ids.ac.uk. Anonim. 2002. "Participatory Investment Promotion" Birleşmiş Milletler Gıda örgütü (FAO) Eğitimi, Ders Notları (Basılmamış). Anonim. 2003a.www.fao.org/participatiori Anonim. 2003b. Agriservices: Participatory Extension, www.gtz.org. Anonim. 2004a, www.undp.org Anonim. 2004b, Paricipation Sourcebook, www.worlbank.org/ Anonim. 2004c, www.ids.ac.uk. The power of participation:PRA and policy Anonim. 2004d. Participatory appraisal for community Assement: Principles and Methods, www.2essex.ac.uk Anonim. 2004e, www.gap.gov.tr Axinn, G. 1991. Guide on alternative extension approaches, FAO Yayınları No:S8971/E,Rome. Chambers, R. 2002. Participatory Workshops,Earthscan Publications, London. 110 sayfa. Cornwall, A. 2003, Whose Voices? Whose Choises? Reflections on gender and participatory development, World Development, 31(8), 1325-1342
  3. Gladwin, C.H., Peterson, J.S. ve Mwale, A.C, 2002. The quality of science in participatory research: A case study from Eastern Zambia. World Development, 30 (4), 523-543.
  4. Hagman, J., Chuma, E., Murwira, K. ve Connolly, M. 1999 Putting process into practice: Operationalising participatory extension, Agricultural Research And Extension Network, No: 94, 1-24. http://www.odi.org.uk/agren/papers/agrenpaper 94.pdf Jules, N. ve Simplice, D. 2003. Using Rapid Or Participatory Rural Appraisal. Improving Agricultural Extension.A Reference Manual. Chapter 5. FAO Yayınları, www.fao.org Saltık, A. ve Gülçubuk, B. 1996, Kırsal kalkınmada katılımcı kırsal değerlendirme, 2. Tarım Ekonomisi Kongresi, Cilt 2, 234-244
  5. Souvanthong, P. ve Trethewie, R. 2001. A Guide to Participatory Extension Procedures and Methods, LAO Swedish Programme, 102 sayfa. Taluğ C. ve Tatlıdil, H., 1993.
  6. Tarımsal Yayım ve Haberleşme, A.Ü.Z.F.Ders notları, Teksir No: 141, 2-8.