Journals / Hand and Microsurgery / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Antegrade homodigital island flap: Tips and tricks

Pages
35–43
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The surgical tips provided in this work willhelp surgeons inside the selection, choosing whether to include the nerve and managing the donor site.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of fingertip reconstruction is to provide stable sensate coverage and maintain the finger length.Homodigital island flaps may be elevated based on an antegrade or retrograde design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, tips and tricks for theantegrade flap are elaborated to highlight its use in fingertip reconstruction.Patients and methods: Between February 2016 and March 2018, 30 patients (37 fingers) were treated with antegradehomodigital island flaps.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The surgical tips provided in this work willhelp surgeons inside the selection, choosing whether to include the nerve and managing the donor site.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background: The aim of fingertip reconstruction is to provide stable sensate coverage and maintain the finger length.Homodigital island flaps may be elevated based on an antegrade or retrograde design. In this study, tips and tricks for theantegrade flap are elaborated to highlight its use in fingertip reconstruction.Patients and methods: Between February 2016 and March 2018, 30 patients (37 fingers) were treated with antegradehomodigital island flaps. Most of the defects were post-traumatic; however, post-burn, contracture release, and diabeticdefects were included. Many tips for the surgical technique were discussed.Results: Thirty-six flaps survived, and flap loss occurred in one diabetic finger followed by finger amputation. Patient satisfactionwas assessed regarding the function and cosmetic outcome. Complications included flap necrosis in one patient,post-operative proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture (< 20°) in 4 patients, and suture disruption that requireddressing and were healed by secondary intention in 6 patients.Conclusion: The antegrade homodigital island flap is considered a good alternative for fingertip coverage, providing a stable,durable cover. Moreover, the shape and contour of the tip improves with time. The surgical tips provided in this work willhelp surgeons inside the selection, choosing whether to include the nerve and managing the donor site.

🔖

Cite This Article

GAD, A. M., ELDAHSHOURY, T. E., HWEİDİ, A. S. (2022). Antegrade homodigital island flap: Tips and tricks. Hand and Microsurgery, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 35–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/533906

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Miranda BH, Spilsbury ZP, Rosala-Hallas A, Cerovac S. Hand trauma: A prospective observational study reporting diagnostic concordance in emergency hand trauma which supports centralised service improvements. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69:1397-402
  2. Ozturk MB, Barutca SA, Aksan T, Atik B. Pulp Rotation Flap for Lateral Oblique Fingertip Defects. Ann Plast Surg 2016;77:529-34
  3. Omokawa S, Tanaka Y, Ryu J, Clovis N. Anatomical consideration of reverse-flow island flap transfers from the midpalm for finger reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:2020-5
  4. Lowrey CW, Chadwick RO, Waltman EN. Digital vessel trauma from repetitive impact in baseball catchers. J Hand Surg Am 1976;1:236-8
  5. Godfrey J, Rayan GM. Anatomy of the Volar Retinacular Elements of the Hand: A Unified Nomenclature. J Hand Surg Am 2018;43:260-70
  6. Smith DO, Oura C, Kimura C, Toshimori K. Artery anatomy and tortuosity in the distal finger. J Hand Surg Am 1991;16:297-302
  7. Braga-Silva J, Kuyven CR, Fallopa F, Albertoni W. An anatomical study of the dorsal cutaneous branches of the digital arteries. J Hand Surg Br 2002;27:577-9
  8. Kim KS, Yoo SI, Kim DY, Lee SY, Cho BH. Fingertip reconstruction using a volar flap based on the transverse palmar branch of the digital artery. Ann Plast Surg 2001;47:263-8
  9. Lucas GL. The pattern of venous drainage of the digits. J Hand Surg Am 1984;9:448-50
  10. Strauch B, de Moura W. Arterial system of the fingers. J Hand Surg Am 1990;15:148-54
  11. Scheker L, Polo F, Aguilar F. Free Tissue Transfer for Fingertip Coverage. In: Rozmaryn L(ed.) Fingertip Injuries. Springer, Cham, 2015;131-48
  12. Gottlieb LJ, Krieger LM. From the reconstructive ladder to the reconstructive elevator. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:1503-4
  13. Martin C, González del Pino J. Controversies in the treatment of fingertip amputations. Conservative versus surgical reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;353:63-73
  14. Muneuchi G, Tamai M, Igawa K, Kurokawa M, Igawa HH. The PNB classification for treatment of fingertip injuries: the boundary between conservative treatment and surgical treatment. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54:604-9
  15. Wu F, Shen X, Eberlin KR, Sun Z, Zhou X, Xue M. The use of arteriovenous anastomosis for venous drainage during Tamai zone I fingertip replantation.Injury 2018;49:1113-8
  16. Brown RE, Zook EG, Russell RC. Fingertip reconstruction with flaps and nail bed grafts. J Hand Surg Am 1999;24:345-51
  17. Saraf S, Tiwari V. Fingertip injuries. In