Journals / Turkish Journal of Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

Early and intermediate term outcomes after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass for morbidly obese patients: a single center experience

Pages
324–335
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

LOAGB is not associated with significant biliary reflux or pathological changes in the esophagogastric mucosa.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate our outcomes of laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) as a primary weight loss procedure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: We reviewed the data of patients who underwent LOAGB during the period between July 2015 till August 2018.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:LOAGB is not associated with significant biliary reflux or pathological changes in the esophagogastric mucosa.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: To evaluate our outcomes of laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) as a primary weight loss procedure. We evaluated the impact of biliary reflux by combination of upper endoscopy (UGIE), ambulatory pH metry, and ambulatory biliary reflux monitoring. Material and Methods: We reviewed the data of patients who underwent LOAGB during the period between July 2015 till August 2018. Results: Forty consecutive patients were included in the study. Thirty-seven patients (92.5%) had obesity related comorbidities. The median follow-up duration was 18 months (6-36 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-years excess weight loss percentages were 53.1%, 60.4%, and 62.3%. At three years follow-up, complete remission of diabetes mellitus occurred in 7/7 patients (100%) and of hypertension in 4/7 patients (57.1%). Eighteen patients (45%) accepted to undergo UGIE with routine biopsies and evaluation of acidic and biliary reflux. All examined patients had negative acid reflux results according to ambulatory PH metry with median DeMeester score of 2 (0.3-8.7). According to ambulatory biliary reflux monitoring, 17/18 patients (94.1%) had positive result. Only 6/18 patients (33.3%) had symptoms of biliary reflux and had positive symptom index on bilimetric study. Regarding UGIE, all patients had just gastritis and reflux esophagitis with no evidence of gross mucosal changes. Pathological examination of all routine biopsies did not show any sign of faveolar hyperplasia, atypia or malignancy. Conclusion: LOAGB is a safe and efficient bariatric procedure with acceptable morbidity rate. LOAGB is not associated with significant biliary reflux or pathological changes in the esophagogastric mucosa.

🔖

Cite This Article

HAGGAG, M., SALEM, A., SULTAN, A. M., ELGHAWALBY, A. N., ELHAK, N. G., SHEHTA, A., ELDESOKY, R. T., ELDEGWI, S. A. (2021). Early and intermediate term outcomes after laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass for morbidly obese patients: a single center experience. Turkish Journal of Surgery, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 324–335. https://ajindex.com/articles/417610

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Dietz WH, Baur LA, Hall K, Puhl RM, Taveras EM, Uauy R, et al. Management of obesity: improvement of health-care training and systems for prevention and care. Lancet 2015; 385(9986): 2521-33
  2. Yanovski SZ, Yanovski JA. Long-term drug treatment for obesity: a systematic and clinical review. JAMA 2014; 311(1): 74-86
  3. Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(26): 2683-93
  4. Arterburn DE, Courcoulas AP. Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic conditions in adults. BMJ 2014; 349: 3961
  5. Perna MJ, Byrne TK, Pullattrana CC. Bariatric surgery for treatment of obesity. In: Shiromani PJ, Horvath T, Redline S, Cauter EV (eds). Sleep Loss and Obesity: Intersecting Epidemics. New York, Springer Media. 2012
  6. Rutledge R. The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases. Obes Surg 2001; 11(3): 276-80
  7. Mahawar KK, Carr WR, Balupuri S, Small PK. Controversy surrounding ‘mini’ gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2014; 24(2): 324-33
  8. Lee Wei-Jei, Ser Kong-Han, Lee Yi-Chih, Tsou Jun-Juin, Chen Shu-Chun, Chen Jung-Chien. Laparoscopic vs. minigastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg 2012; 22(12): 1827-34
  9. Mahawar KK, Jennings N, Balupuri S, and Small PK. Sleeve Gastrectomy and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a complex relationship. Obes Surg 2013; 23(7): 987-91
  10. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 55(2 Suppl): 615S-619S
  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2): 205-13
  12. Brethauer SA, Kim J, El Chaar M, Papasavas P, Eisenberg D, Rogers A, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2015; 25(4): 587-606
  13. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg 2013; 23(4): 427-36
  14. Wei-Jei L, Po-Jui Y, Wang W, Tai-Chi C, Po-Li W, Ming-Te H, et al. Laparoscopic versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg 2005; 242(1): 20-8
  15. Mahawar KK, Kumar P, Carr WR, Jennings N, Schroeder N, Balupuri S, et al. Current status of minigastric bypass. J Minim Access Surg 201