SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Team Decision Making Questionnaire Turkish Form (TDMQ-TR): Validity and Reliability Study

Eren ŞAHİN
Filiz ASLAN
D. Melek ER SABUNCUOĞLU
Fikriye Eda KARAÇUL
Pages
573–590
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: As a result of the statistical analysis of the data, the overall Cronbach α coefficient of TDMQ-TR was 0.96, the Guttmann Split-Two Half Reliability Coefficient was 0.92, and the correlation between both halves of the questionnaire was 0.86.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: Professionals in the fields of education and health who work with children with special needs and their families should be in communication and cooperation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The aim of the study is to examine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Team Decision Making Questionnaire developed by Batorowicz and Shepherd (2008). 167 professionals working with children from both education and health fields participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: As a result of the statistical analysis of the data, the overall Cronbach α coefficient of TDMQ-TR was 0.96, the Guttmann Split-Two Half Reliability Coefficient was 0.92, and the correlation between both halves of the questionnaire was 0.86.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Interprofessional · questionnaire · reliability

Abstract

Objectives: Professionals in the fields of education and health who work with children with special needs and their families should be in communication and cooperation. At each stage of these services, professionals specialized in different fields provide services to the child and family with different perspectives. In this way, it is ensured that children are evaluated in a multidimensional and comprehensive manner, and their families are informed. However, some difficulties may be encountered in the implementation of teamwork in the process of providing health, rehabilitation and education services to children and their families with special needs in Turkey. In the literature, although there are research studies on "teamwork" in some occupational groups in the field of health, there are no similar studies in the field of education. Based on this, a questionnaire is researched and this study is planned for the decision-making situation of the professional groups that provide services to children in our country. Materials and Methods: The aim of the study is to examine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Team Decision Making Questionnaire developed by Batorowicz and Shepherd (2008). 167 professionals working with children from both education and health fields participated in the study. Results: As a result of the statistical analysis of the data, the overall Cronbach α coefficient of TDMQ-TR was 0.96, the Guttmann Split-Two Half Reliability Coefficient was 0.92, and the correlation between both halves of the questionnaire was 0.86. The 19-item questionnaire is integrated with a single factor and 61.75 percent of the total variance is explained. Conclusion: As a result, TDMQ-TR is proven to be a reliable and valid tool for evaluating the team decision-making process.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, E., ASLAN, F., SABUNCUOĞLU, D. M. E., KARAÇUL, F. E. (2022). Team Decision Making Questionnaire Turkish Form (TDMQ-TR): Validity and Reliability Study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 573–590. https://ajindex.com/articles/533398

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alpar, R. (2011). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler [Applied multivariate statistical methods]. Ankara:
  2. Detay. Aslan, F., & Şahin, E. (2020). İletişim güçlüğü olan çocuklar [Children with communication difficulties]. In M. Er-Sabuncuoğlu (Ed.), Çocuk tanıma ve problem çözme aracı olarak ICF [ICF as a child recognition and problem-solving tool] (pp. 93-114). Ankara:
  3. Nobel. Aubin, T., & Mortenson, P. (2015). Experiences of early transdisciplinary teams in pediatric community rehabilitation. Infants and Young Children, 28(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000033
  4. Batorowicz, B., & Shepherd, T. A. (2008). Measuring the quality of transdisciplinary teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(6), 612-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820802303664
  5. Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2005). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (3rd Ed.). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing. Çelik, A., & Karaca, A. (2017). Hemşirelerde ekip çalışması ve motivasyon arasındaki ilişkinin ve etkileyen faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluating the relationship between teamwork and motivation in nurses and affecting factors]. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing, 14(4), 254-263. https://doi.org/10.5222/HEAD.2017.254
  6. Chang, T. Z. D., & Vowles, N. (2013). Strategies for improving data reliability for online surveys: A case study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 4(1), 121-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.7903/ijecs.1121
  7. Coşkun, A. (1996). Perinatal hemşirelik yaklaşımı ve ekip çalışmasının önemi [Perinatal nursing approach and importance of teamwork]. Perinatology Journal, 4(3), 181-184.
  8. Demirci, F. (2020). Examination of early childhood educators’ perspectives on transdisciplinary approach. Retrieved from YÖK National Thesis Center. (No. 612068)
  9. Erkuş, A. (2007). Ölçek geliştirme ve uyarlama çalışmalarında karşılaşılan sorunlar [Problems encountered in scale development and adaptation studies]. Türk Psikoloji Bülteni, 13(40), 17-25.
  10. Er-Sabuncuoğlu, D. M. (2020). Çocuğa hizmet sunan ekipler nasıl çalışmalı? [How should child service teams work?]. In D.M Er-Sabuncuoğlu (Ed.), Konu çocuk olunca [When it comes to children] (pp. 349-384). Ankara:
  11. Nobel Francisco, M. P. B., Hartman, M., & Wang, Y. (2020). Inclusion and special education. Education Sciences, 10(9), 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090238
  12. York-Barr, J., Ghere, G., & Sommerness, J. (2009). What’s Working and Wh