SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

The Impact of Psychological Empowerment Perception and Some Demographic Variables to Organizational Commitment

Psikolojik Güçlendirme Algısı ve Bazı Demografik Değişkenlerin Örgütsel Bağlılığa Etkisi

Güler ARI SAĞLAM
Azize ERGENELİ
Pages
129–149
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, perception of psychological empowerment and organizational commitment were found to be strongly related.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research has been undertaken to determine the relationship among psychological empowerment, certain demographic variables and organizational commitment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total number of 223 bank administrators, working in public and private sectors, including branch managers, vice managers and chiefs were evaluated through a questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, perception of psychological empowerment and organizational commitment were found to be strongly related.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This research has been undertaken to determine the relationship among psychological empowerment, certain demographic variables and organizational commitment. A total number of 223 bank administrators, working in public and private sectors, including branch managers, vice managers and chiefs were evaluated through a questionnaire. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that organizational commitment has a significant relation with gender, 'managerial position, years of experience but not with educational level. Furthermore, perception of psychological empowerment and organizational commitment were found to be strongly related.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, psikolojik güçlendirme algısı ile bazı demografik değişkenlerin örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Kamu ve özel sektörde yer alan bankalarda şube müdürü, müdür yardımcısı ve şef pozisyonunda görev yapmakta olan 223 kişiden anket yoluyla bilgi toplanmıştır. İstatistiksel analiz sonucunda örgütsel bağlılıkla cinsiyet, yönetsel pozisyon, ve çalışma süresinin ilişkisinin olduğu ancak eğitim düzeyinin ilişkisinin olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Öte yandan psikolojik güçlendirme algısı ile örgütsel bağlılık arasında da güçlü bir ilişki bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞLAM, G. A., ERGENELİ, A. (2022). The Impact of Psychological Empowerment Perception and Some Demographic Variables to Organizational Commitment. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 129–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/533354

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Alan, R. ve W.M. Sashkin (2002), " Can Organizational Empowerment Work in Multinational Settings", Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 102-116.
  2. Allen, N.J. ve J.P. Meyer (1990), "The Measurement And Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization", Journal of Occupational Psychology,63, 1-18.
  3. Balay, R. (2000), Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerde Örgütsel Bağlılık, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Boweni D.A. ve E. F. Lawler III (1992), "The Empowerment of Service Workers; What, Why, How, and When", Sloan Management Review, Spring, 31-39.
  4. Chebat, J. C. ve P. Kollias (2000), " The Impact of Empowerment on Customer Contact Employees Roles in Service Organizations", Journal of Service Research, 3(1), August, 66-81.
  5. Conger, J. A. ve R. N. Kanungo (1988), "The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory And Practice", Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
  6. Cook, W. ve T. Wall (1980), "New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personel Need Non- Fulfilment." Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52.
  7. Çakır, Ö. (2001), işe Bağlılık Olgusu ve Etkileyen Faktörler, Ankara:
  8. Seçkin Yayınevi.
  9. Daft, R. (1998),
  10. Organization Theory and Design, Sixth Edition, Ohio: South- Western College Publishing. D'anunzio, N. G., ve J. MacAndrew (1999), "Re-empowering the Empowered- The Ultimate Challenge", Personnel Review, 28(3), 258-279.
  11. Flohr Nielsen, J. ve C. P. Pedersen (2003), "The Consequences and Limits of Empowerment in Financial Services", Scandivian Journal of Management, 19, 63-83.
  12. Hançer, M. ve R.T. George (2003), "Psychological Empowerent of Npn- Supervisory Employees Working in Full-Service Restaurants", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 22(1), 3-16. Hardy,C., S. Leiba O'Sullivan (1998), "The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications For Research and Practice", Human Relations, 51(4), 451-483.
  13. Klagge, J. (1998), "The Empowerment Squeeze-Views from the Middle Management Position", Journal of Management Development, 17(7/8), 548-559.
  14. Koçel, T. (1998), İşletme Yöneticiliği, 6. Bası, Istanbul: Beta Basım Yayım. Lee, M. ve J.Koh (2001), "Is Empowerment Really a New Concept", International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(4), 684-695.
  15. Mathieu, J.E. ve D.M. Zajac (1990), "A Review and Meta-Analysis of The Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment", Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171-194.
  16. Niehof, B. P. RİH.Moorman, G.Blakely ve J. Fuller (2001), "The Influence of Empower