SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

A Study of Reliability, Validity and Adaptation of Self Leadership Questionnaire in a Turkish Context

Kendi Kendine Liderlik Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması, Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Çalışması

Faruk ŞAHİN
Selen DOĞAN
Pages
139–164
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, the scale which was adapted to Turkish context to measure individuals’ self-leadership strategies was found to be reliable but, validity of it could not be confirmed with that data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Self-leadership is a process through which individuals control their own behavior, influencing and leading themselves through the use of specific sets of behavioral and cognitive strategies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study seeks to examine the reliability, validity and adaptation of the Houghton and Neck (2002) Revised Self- Leadership Questionnaire (RSLQ) in a Turkish context.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, the scale which was adapted to Turkish context to measure individuals’ self-leadership strategies was found to be reliable but, validity of it could not be confirmed with that data.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Self-leadership is a process through which individuals control their own behavior, influencing and leading themselves through the use of specific sets of behavioral and cognitive strategies. This study seeks to examine the reliability, validity and adaptation of the Houghton and Neck (2002) Revised Self- Leadership Questionnaire (RSLQ) in a Turkish context. The RSLQ was administered to 563 employees from public and private sectors. For construct validity, exploratory factor analysis is conducted with principal component and varimax rotation method. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the scale had nine factors which explained 68 %of the total variance. The factor structure of the Turkish version was found to be similar to the original version. Internal consistency coefficients of subscales were varied from 0.64 to 0.87 respectively. The results from a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) utilizing structural equation modelling techniques demonstrate no fit for three models proposed. As a result, the scale which was adapted to Turkish context to measure individuals’ self-leadership strategies was found to be reliable but, validity of it could not be confirmed with that data.

Özet

Kendi kendine liderlik kavramı bireyin kendi davranıslarını kontrol ettiği, belirli bilissel ve davranıssal stratejileri kullanarak kendi kendini etkileyip yönlendirebildiği bir süreç olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu çalısma, Houghton ve Neck’in (2002) Kendi Kendine Liderlik Ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması, geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalısmasını kapsamaktadır. Ölçek kamu ve özel sektördeki 563 çalısana uygulanmıstır. Yapı geçerliliği için kesfedici faktör analizi, temel bilesenler analizi ve varimaks döndürme yöntemleri kullanılmıstır. Kesfedici faktör analizi sonuçları ölçeğin toplam varyansın %68’ini açıklayan dokuz faktör yapısına sahip olduğunu göstermistir. Ölçeğin Türkçe formunun faktör yapısının özgün formla tutarlılık gösterdiği, alt ölçeklerin iç tutarlılık katsayılarının 0.64 değerinden 0.87 değerine kadar değistiği görülmüstür. Yapısal esitlik modeli tekniği kullanılarak yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda, önerilen üç modelin verilerle uyusmadığı ortaya çıkmıstır. Sonuç olarak, ölçeğin bireylerin kendi kendine liderlik stratejilerini ölçmede güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu saptanmıstır, fakat ölçeğin geçerliliği elde edilen verilerle doğrulanamamıstır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, F., DOĞAN, S. (2022). A Study of Reliability, Validity and Adaptation of Self Leadership Questionnaire in a Turkish Context. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 139–164. https://ajindex.com/articles/533209

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alves, J.C., K.J. Lovelace, C.C. Manz, D. Matsypura, F. Toyasaki and K. Ke (2006) “A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Self-Leadership”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 338-359.
  2. Anderson, J.S. and G.E. Prussia (1997) “The Self-Leadership Questionnaire: Preliminary Assessment of Construct Validity”, The Journal of Leadership Studies, 4, 119-143.
  3. Cox, J.F. (1993) “The Effects of Superleadership Training on Leader Behavior, Subordinate Self-Leadership Behavior, and Subordinate Citizenship”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Conway, J.M. and A.I. Huffcutt (2003) “A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research”, Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 147-168.
  4. Houghton, J.D. and C.P. Neck (2002) “The Revised Self-Leadership Questionnaire: Testing a Hierarchical Factor Structure for Self-Leadership”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672-691.
  5. House, R.J. and R.N. Aditya (1997) “The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis”, Journal of Management, 23(3), 409-473.
  6. Jöreskog, K.G. and D. Sörbom (1996) LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide, Chicago: Scientific Software International. Kerr, S. and J.M. Jermier, (1978) “Substitutes for Leadership: Their Meaning and Measurement”, Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375-403.
  7. Leech, Nancy L., Karen C. Barret and George A. Morgan (2005)
  8. SPSS for Intermediate Statistics, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocıates. Manz, C.C. (1986) “Self-Leadership: Toward an Expanded Theory of Self-Influence Processes in Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 11, 585-600.
  9. Manz, C.C. and C.P. Neck (1999) Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering Yourself for Personel Excellence, (2nd ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Manz, C.C. and H.P. Jr Sims (1980) “Self-Management as a Substitute for Leadership: A Social Learning Theory Perspective”, Academy of Management Review, 5, 361-367.
  10. Manz, C.C. and H.P. Jr Sims (1989) SuperLeadership: Leading Others to Lead Themselves, N.Y.: Prentice-Hall Trade. Manz, C.C. and H.P. Jr Sims (1991) “SuperLeadership: Beyond The Myth of Heroic Leadership”, Organizational Dynamics, Spring, 19(4), 18-35.
  11. Neck, C.P. (1996) “Thought Self-Leadership: A Self-Regulatory Approach Towards Overcoming Resistance to Organizational Change”, The International Journal Of Organizational Analysis, 4(2), 202-216.
  12. Neck, C.P. and J.D. Houghton (2006) “Two Decades of Self-Leadership Theory and Research: Past Developm