SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

SUBORDINATE ATTRIBUTIONS FOR UNEXPECTED BEHAVIORS IN SUPERVISOR-SUBORDINATE RELATIONS

SUBORDINATE ATTRIBUTIONS FOR UNEXPECTED BEHAVIORS IN SUPERVISOR-SUBORDINATE RELATIONSHIPS

Arzu İLSEV
Pages
209–233
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, quality of the LMX relationship was found to have a moderating effect on this relationship and the relationship between perceived favorability of deviation and internal attribution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine subordinate attributions made for unexpected supervisor behaviors in established supervisor-subordinate relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data for this study were collected from employees through a questionnaire Results of the analysis suggest that favorability of the supervisor behavior inconsistent with subordinate expectations along with the quality of the LMX (Leader-Member Exchange) relationship influence attributions made for unexpected behaviors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, quality of the LMX relationship was found to have a moderating effect on this relationship and the relationship between perceived favorability of deviation and internal attribution.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lider-üye değişimi · atıf · atfetme

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine subordinate attributions made for unexpected supervisor behaviors in established supervisor-subordinate relationships. Data for this study were collected from employees through a questionnaire Results of the analysis suggest that favorability of the supervisor behavior inconsistent with subordinate expectations along with the quality of the LMX (Leader-Member Exchange) relationship influence attributions made for unexpected behaviors. Perceived favorability of deviation had a positive and direct effect on attribution to positive intentions. Furthermore, quality of the LMX relationship was found to have a moderating effect on this relationship and the relationship between perceived favorability of deviation and internal attribution.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı çalışanların amirlerinin beklenmedik davranışlarını hangi faktörlere atfettiklerini incelemektir. Anket yöntemiyle toplanan verilerin analiz sonuçları amirin davranışının çalışanın beklentileriyle olan uyumsuzluğu-nun algılanan çekiciliği ile lider-üye değişiminin kalitesinin beklenmeyen davranış için yapılan atıflara etkide bulunduklarını göstermektedir. Uyumsuz-luğun çekiciliğinin amirin olumlu/olumsuz niyetine yapılan atıfları olumlu yönde etkilediği saptanmıştır. Ayrıca, lider-üye değişimi ilişkisinin kalitesinin hem bu ilişkiyi hem de uyumsuzluğun çekiciliğiyle içsel atıflar arasındaki ilişkiyi düzenleyici etkisi olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

İLSEV, A. (2022). SUBORDINATE ATTRIBUTIONS FOR UNEXPECTED BEHAVIORS IN SUPERVISOR-SUBORDINATE RELATIONS. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 209–233. https://ajindex.com/articles/533191

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aiken, L.S. and S.G. West (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Baldwin, M.W. (1992) “Relational Schemas and the Processing of Social Information”, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461-484.
  2. Bauer, T.N. and S.G. Green (1996) “Development of Leader-Member Exchange: A Longitudinal Test”, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538-1567.
  3. Belmore, S.M. (1987) “Determinants of Attention during Impression Formation”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 480-489.
  4. Benet-Martinez, V. and O.P. John (1998) “Los Cinco Grandes across Cultures and Ethnic Groups: Multitrait Multimethod Analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729-750.
  5. Bhal, K.T. and M.A. (1996) “Measuring Quality of Interaction between Leaders and Members”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 945-972.
  6. Bies, R.J. and T.M. Tripp (1996) “Beyond Distrust: ‘Getting Even’ and the Need for Revenge”, in Kramer, R. and Tyler, T. (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 246-260.
  7. Bradbury, T.N. and F.D. Fincham (1990) “Attributions in Marriage: Review and Critique”, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3-33.
  8. Bradbury, T.N and F.D. Fincham (1992) “Attributions and Behavior in Marital Interaction”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 613-628.
  9. Burgoon, J.K. (1993) “Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication”, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30-48.
  10. Dansereau, F., G. Graen, and W.J. Haga (1975) “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
  11. Duchon, D., S.G. Green, and T.D. Taber (1986) “Vertical Dyad Linkage: A Longitudinal Assessment of Antecedents, Measures, and Consequences”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 56-60.
  12. Duck, S. and H. Sants (1983) “On the Origin of the Specious: Are Personal Relationships Really Interpersonal States?”, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 27-41.
  13. Fincham, F.D. (1985) “Attributions in Close Relationships”, in Harvey, J.H. and Weary, G. (eds.), Attribution: Basic Issues and Applications, Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 203-234.
  14. Fincham, F.D. and J.M. Jaspars (1980) “Attribution of Responsibility: From Man the Scientist to Man as Lawyer”, in Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social