SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Attitudinal and behavioral consistency of consumer innovativeness

Tüketici yenilikçiliginin tutumsal ve davranışsal uyumunun incelenmesi

Canan ERYİĞİT
Bahtışen KAVAK
Pages
95–113
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This finding may result in revising the existing innovativeness scales for each adopter category.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Attitudinal and Behavioral Consistency of Consumer Innovativeness In this study, consumer innovativeness was determined by using Bass innovation diffusion model, domain spesific innovativeness scale and innate innovativeness scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The required data is gathered through a questionnaire from 287 households.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This finding may result in revising the existing innovativeness scales for each adopter category.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Attitudinal and Behavioral Consistency of Consumer Innovativeness In this study, consumer innovativeness was determined by using Bass innovation diffusion model, domain spesific innovativeness scale and innate innovativeness scale. The innovativeness degree measured by these methods were compared. The required data is gathered through a questionnaire from 287 households. Results of discriminant analysis revealed that adopter categories do not differentiate on the basis of innate innovativeness and domain spesific innovativeness degree. This finding may result in revising the existing innovativeness scales for each adopter category.

Özet

Bu çalısmada, tüketici yenilikçiligi Bass yayılma modeli, ilgi alanına özgü yenilikçilik ölçegi ve dogustan yenilikçilik ölçegi ile belirlenerek, tutum ve davranıs ölçümlerinin benzer sonuçlar verip vermedigi test edilmistir. Anket yöntemiyle 287 hanehalkından toplanan veriye uygulanan ayırma analizi sonuçlarına göre dogustan yenilikçilik ve LCD televizyon için belirlenen ilgi alanına özgü yenilikçilik Bass yayılma modeli ile olusturulan benimseyen kategorilerini tanımlamamaktadır. Bu sonuçla, yenilikçiligi ölçen tutum ölçeklerinin benimseyen kategorileri açısından yeniden gelistirilmesi gerektigi önerilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERYİĞİT, C., KAVAK, B. (2022). Attitudinal and behavioral consistency of consumer innovativeness. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 95–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/533135

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ajzen I. and M. Fishbein (1977) “Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research”, Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918. Alda´s-Manzano J., C. Lassala-Navarre, C. Ruiz-Mafe´ and S. Sanz-Blas (2009) “The Role of Consumer Innovativeness and Perceived Risk in Online Banking Usage”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(1), 53-75.
  2. Bass, F. and A.V. Bultez (1982) “A Note on Optimal Strategic Pricing of Technological Innovations”, Marketing Science, 1(4), 371-78.
  3. Bradly, L., and K.Steward, (2003) “The Diffusion of Online Banking”, Journal of Marketing Management, 19(9/10), 1087–1109.
  4. Burdenski, T. (2000) “Evaluating Univariate, Bivariate, and Multivariate Normality, Using Graphical and Statistical Procedures”, Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints, 26(2), 15-28.
  5. Cheng J. M.S., Kao, L.Y. and Ying-Chao, J. (2004) “An Investigation of Diffusion of Online Games in Taiwan: An Application of Roger’s Diffusion of Innovation Theory”, The Journal of American Academy of Business, September, 439- 45. Clark R.A. and R.E. Goldsmith (2006) “Global Innovativeness and Consumer Susceptibility To Interpersonal Influence”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 14(4), 275–285.
  6. Field A. (2003) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS for Windows: Advanced Techniques for Beginners, Wiltshire: Sage. Fornerino, M. (2003) “Internet adoption in France”, The Service Industries Journal, 23(1), 119–135.
  7. Foxall, G.R. (1984) Corporate Innovation: Marketing Strategy, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  8. Goldsmith, R.E., F. d’Hauteville, and L.R., Flynn (1998) “Theory and Measurement of Consumer Innovativeness: a Transnational Evaluation”, European Journal of Marketing, 32(3/4), 340-9.
  9. Goldsmith, R.E. and C.F. Hofacker (1991) “Measuring Consumer Innovativeness”, Journalof the Academy of Marketing Science, 19, 209-221.
  10. Goldsmith R. E.and L.R., Flynn (1992) “Identifying Innovators in Consumer Product Markets”, European Journal of Marketing, 26(12), 42–55.
  11. Hirunyawipada T. and A.K. Paswan (2006) “Consumer Innovativeness and Perceived Risk: Implications for High Technology Product Adoption”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 182–198.
  12. Hoffmann S. and K.A. Soyez (2010) “Cognitive Model To Predict Domain-Specific Consumer Innovativeness”, Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 778-785.
  13. Kavak, B. (2008) Pazarlama Arastırmaları Tasarım ve Analiz, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  14. Kavak, B. ve C. Demirsoy (2009) “Identification of Adopter Categories for Online