Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

A Study investigating the effect of organizational justice perceptions on organizational ıdentification

Örgütsel adalet algılarının örgütsel özdeşleşme üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma

Pages
1–30
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The hypotheses ofthis study was tested with the full-latent variable path analysis and stepwiseregression using the data collected from 161 employees of a public organization.According to the results of path analysis, the effects of distribution andinformational justice on identification were found to be non-significant, whilethe effects of the other justice dimensions (i.e., procedural and interpersonaljustice) was found to be significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of organizational justicedimensions on organizational identification.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The hypotheses ofthis study was tested with the full-latent variable path analysis and stepwiseregression using the data collected from 161 employees of a public organization.According to the results of path analysis, the effects of distribution andinformational justice on identification were found to be non-significant, whilethe effects of the other justice dimensions (i.e., procedural and interpersonaljustice) was found to be significant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Possiblereasons for these conflicting results and justice-identification relationship werediscussed considering the results and literature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of organizational justicedimensions on organizational identification. In this study, employees believingthe fairness of rewards, procedures, interpersonal relations and knowledgesharing are assumed to feel more organizational identification. The hypotheses ofthis study was tested with the full-latent variable path analysis and stepwiseregression using the data collected from 161 employees of a public organization.According to the results of path analysis, the effects of distribution andinformational justice on identification were found to be non-significant, whilethe effects of the other justice dimensions (i.e., procedural and interpersonaljustice) was found to be significant. The results of stepwise regression revealedthat distributional, informational and interpersonal justice predictedorganizational justice positively, while procedural justice could not. Bothanalyses demonstrated the significant effect of interpersonal justice onidentfication, while gave mixed results about other justice dimensions. Possiblereasons for these conflicting results and justice-identification relationship werediscussed considering the results and literature.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel adalet algısı boyutlarının örgütsel özdeşleşmeüzerindeki etkisi araştırmaktır. Çalışmada örgüt içindeki ödüllerin, uygulananyöntemlerin, kişilerarası ilişkilerin ve bilgi paylaşımının adil olduğuna inanançalışanların hissettikleri özdeşleşmenin daha yüksek olduğu varsayılmıştır.Çalışma kapsamında öne sürülen hipotezler bir kamu kuruluşunda çalışan 161kişiden toplanan veriler kullanılarak örtük değişkenlerle yol analizi ve aşamalıregresyon analizleri yapılarak test edilmiştir. Yol analizinde, dağıtımsal vebilgisel adaletin özdeşleşme üzerinde etkilerinin anlamlı olmadığı, diğer ikiboyutun (süreç ve kişilerarası adaletin) ise örgütsel özdeşleşmeyi tahminedebildiğini göstermiştir. Aşamalı regresyon analizi sonuçları ise dağıtımsal,bilgisel ve kişilerarası adaletin özdeşlemeyi pozitif yönde tahmin edebildiğini,süreç adaletinin ise özdeşleşme üzerinde etkili olamadığını göstermiştir. Her ikianaliz kişiler arası adaletin özdeşleşme üzerinde etkili olduğunu göstermekte;diğer adalet boyutları konusunda farklı sonuçlar vermektedir. Bu durumun olasısebepleri ve adalet-özdeşleşme ilişkisi elde edilen bulgular ve literatürçerçevesinde tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAYFUR, Ö., CÜCE, H., GÜNEY, S. (2022). A Study investigating the effect of organizational justice perceptions on organizational ıdentification. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 1–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/533104

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abrams, D., K. Ando, S. Hinkle (1998) “Psychological Attachment to the group: CrossCultural Differences in Organizational Identification and Subjective Norms as Predictors of Workers' Turnover Intentions”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1027-39. Adalet (t.y.) Türk Dil Kurumu Türkçe Sözlük içinde http://tdkterim.gov.tr/bts/’den alınmıştır. Allen, M.W. (1992) “Communication and Organizational Commitment: Perceived Organizational Support as a Mediator Factor”, Communication Quarterly, 40, 357-367.
  2. Ambrose, M., R.L. Hess, S. Ganesan (2007) “The Relationship Between Justice and Attitudes: An Examination of Justice Effects on Event and System-Related Attitudes”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 21-36.
  3. Arbuckle, J. L. (2008) IBM SPSS AMOS 17 User's Guide, Crawfordville, PL, USA: AMOS Development Corporation. Ashforth, B.E., F. Mael (1989) “Social Identity Theory and the Organization”, Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
  4. Ashforth, B.E., S.H. Harrison, K.G. Corley (2008), “Identification in Organizations: An Examination of Four Fundamantal Questions”, Journal of Management, 34(3), 325-374.
  5. Aycan, Z. (2001) “Human Resources Management in Turkey, Current Issues and Future Challenges”, International Journal of Manpower, 22(3), 252-260.
  6. Baş, G., C. Şentürk (2011) İlköğretim Okulu Öğretmenlerinin Örgütsel Adalet, Örgütsel Vatandaşlık ve Örgütsel Güven Algıları, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 17(1), 29-62.
  7. Başar, U. (2011) “Örgütsel Adalet Algısı Örgütsel Özdeşleşme ve İş Tatmini Arasındaki İlişkilere Yönelik Görgül Bir Araştırma”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara: Kara Harp Okulu Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Beugre, C.D. (2002) “Understanding Organizational Justice and Its Impact on Managing Employees: An African Perspective”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(7), 1091-1104.
  8. Beugre, C.D., R.A. Baron (2001) “Perceptions of Systemic Justice: The Effects of Distributive, Procedural and Interactional Justice”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 324-339.
  9. Bies, R.J. (2001) “Interactional (In)Justice: The Sacred and the Profane”, In J. Greenberg ve R. Cropanzano (ed.), Advances in Organizational Justice, Stanford University Press, California, 89-118.
  10. Bies, R., J. Moag (1986) “Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness”, Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 43-55.
  11. Blader, S.L., T.R. Tyler (2009) “Testing and Extending the Group Engagement Model: Linkages be