Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE

ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEK VE PSİKOLOJİK SAHİPLENME ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ VE BU İLİŞKİDE ÖRGÜTSEL ADALETİN ROLÜ

Pages
113–140
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results showed that perceived organizational support items loaded on two factors as “work related support” and “emotional support” and there is a positive relationship between both of the perceived organizational support factors and psychological ownership.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Psychological ownership is defined as the state which individuals feel that a piece of target is theirs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected by questionnaires from 250 employees working in different organizations operating in different sectors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results showed that perceived organizational support items loaded on two factors as “work related support” and “emotional support” and there is a positive relationship between both of the perceived organizational support factors and psychological ownership.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Psikolojik sahiplenme · algılanan örgütsel destek · örgütsel adalet

Abstract

Psychological ownership is defined as the state which individuals feel that a piece of target is theirs. Even in the absence of legal ownership, individuals might develop psychological ownership directed at an organization, a group, an idea, a suggestion, an equipment or a job. Limited research on the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership make the concept rather interesting. Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between perceived organizational support and psychological ownership and the role of organizational justice which has the potential to explain various organizational behavior. Data were collected by questionnaires from 250 employees working in different organizations operating in different sectors. Results showed that perceived organizational support items loaded on two factors as “work related support” and “emotional support” and there is a positive relationship between both of the perceived organizational support factors and psychological ownership. Additionally, results showed that distributive, interactional and procedural justice has a moderating role on the relationship between “work related support” and psychological ownership stressing that this relationship is significant only when the organizational justice factors are low in the organization.

Özet

Psikolojik sahiplenme, bireylerin herhangi bir “nesneyi” kendilerininmiş gibi hissettiği durum olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bireyler, hukuki anlamda bir sahiplik olmasa da örgüte, gruba, fikre, öneriye, ekipmana ve işe karşı psikolojik sahiplenme geliştirebilmektedirler. Psikolojik sahiplenmenin öncelleri ve sonuçları hakkında sınırlı sayıda araştırma bulunması konuyu ilginç kılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı da algılanan örgütsel destek ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek ve bu ilişkide birçok örgütsel davranışı açıklama potansiyeline sahip olan örgütsel adaletin rolünü araştırmaktır. Veriler, anket yolu ile İstanbul’da farklı sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren örgütlerdeki 250 çalışandan toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, algılanan örgütsel desteğin işle ilgili destek ve duygusal destek olmak üzere iki faktörden oluştuğunu ve her iki faktör ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasında pozitif bir ilişkinin bulunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Buna ek olarak, sonuçlar dağıtım, etkileşimsel ve işlemsel adaletin çalışana işle ilgili verilen destek ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasında düzenleyici role sahip olduğunu gösterirken, örgütsel adaletin düşük olduğu durumlarda işle ilgili verilen destek ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasında anlamlı bir ilişkinin söz konusu olduğu gibi ilginç bir sonucu da vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖTKEN, A. B. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 113–140. https://ajindex.com/articles/533060

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in Social Exchange”, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academy Press, 267-299.
  2. Aiken, L.S., S.G. West, (1991), Multiple Regression. Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Newbury Park: Sage. Asatryan, V.S., H. Oh, (2008), “Psychological ownership theory: an Exploratory Application in the Restaurant Industry”, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 32, 363–86.
  3. Baron, R.M., D.A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  4. Blau, P.M. (1964),
  5. Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: John Wiley. Bies, R.J., J.F. Moag (1986), “Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness”, in R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, M.H. Bazerman (eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations, Greenwich: JAI Press, 43-55.
  6. Blau, P.M. (1964),
  7. Exchange and Power in Life, New York: Wiley. Börü, D., B. Güneşer (2006), “Algılanan Örgütsel Destek ve Lider Üye Etkileşiminin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı ile İlişkisi ve Güvenin Rolü”, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüs Dergisi, 7(25), 43-58.
  8. Çakar, N.D., S. Yıldız (2009), “Örgütsel Adaletin İş Tatmini Üzerindeki Etkisi: ‘Algılanan Örgütsel Destek’ Bir Ara Değişken Mi?”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(28), 68-90.
  9. Chi, Nai-Wen, Tzu-Shian, Ha (2008), “Exploring the Linkages between Formal Ownership and Psychological Ownership for the Organization: The Mediating Role of Organizational Justice”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 691-711.
  10. Colquitt, J.A. (2001), “On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
  11. De Cremer, D., M. Van Dijke, A.E.R. Bos (2007), “When Leaders Seen as Transformational: The Effects of Organizational Justice”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(8), 1797- 1816. Demir, M. (2012), “Örgütsel Destek, Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Eğilimi İlişkisi: Havalimanı Yer Hizmetleri İşletmelerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Journal of Industrial Relations & Human Resources, 14(1), 49-64.
  12. Dittmar, H. (1992), “Perceived Material Wealth and First Impressions”, British Journal of Social Psychology, 31(4), 379-391.
  13. Eisenberger, R., R. Huntington, S. Hutchison, D. Sowa (1986), “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507. E