Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4

THE ORIGINAL INSTITUTIONALISM AS A SCHOOL OF POLITICAL ECONOMICS

BİR POLİTİK İKTİSAT OKULU OLARAK ORİJİNAL KURUMSALCILIK

Pages
591–610
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper, in this context, aims first to examine the methodological and theoretical space of original institutionalism in the wider discipline of political economy with particular reference to its points of divergence from the new and rational choice institutionalism, and then to investigate its rudiments in terms of the systemic interactions between the building blocks of a politico-economic regime ranging from norm-contingent economic development to business cycles and innovation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the Great Recession of 2008-09, a regulation-theoretic agenda, albeit ambigious, has come to the fore.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the field of political economy, it is principally the original institutionalism that bases its premises upon a constraint-theoretic regulation of economic institutions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper, in this context, aims first to examine the methodological and theoretical space of original institutionalism in the wider discipline of political economy with particular reference to its points of divergence from the new and rational choice institutionalism, and then to investigate its rudiments in terms of the systemic interactions between the building blocks of a politico-economic regime ranging from norm-contingent economic development to business cycles and innovation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Orijinal/eski/tarihsel kurumsalcılık · politik iktisat · yeni kurumsalcılık

Abstract

With the Great Recession of 2008-09, a regulation-theoretic agenda, albeit ambigious, has come to the fore. In the field of political economy, it is principally the original institutionalism that bases its premises upon a constraint-theoretic regulation of economic institutions. This paper, in this context, aims first to examine the methodological and theoretical space of original institutionalism in the wider discipline of political economy with particular reference to its points of divergence from the new and rational choice institutionalism, and then to investigate its rudiments in terms of the systemic interactions between the building blocks of a politico-economic regime ranging from norm-contingent economic development to business cycles and innovation.

Özet

2008-09 Büyük Resesyonu” ile birlikte devlet-piyasa ilişkilerinin kamu kesimi tarafından uygulanacak kısıtlarla düzenlenmesinin gerekliliğini vurgulayan teorik ve pratik bir gündem önplana çıkmıştır. Politik iktisat yazınında iktisadi kurumların kısıt (constraint) merkezli kamusal regülasyonunu formüle eden ana akım orjinal tarihselci okuldur. Bu çalışma, bu anlamda, iki temel amacı gerçekleştirmeyi hedeflemektedir. Birincisi orijinal tarihsel kurumsalcı okulun politik iktisat okulları içerisindeki metodolojik ve teorik önemini yeni ve rasyonel tercih kurumsalcılıklarından farklılılaşan yönlerini önplana çıkaran bir yaklaşımla incelemektir. İkincisi ise orijinal kurumsalcı okulun temel politika önermelerini norm-koşullu iktisadi kalkınmadan iş çevrimleri ve inovasyona kadar uzanan bir kapsamda ve bir ekonomi politik yapının temel bileşenleri arasındaki sistemik etkileşimler temelinde analiz etmektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKAN, T. (2022). THE ORIGINAL INSTITUTIONALISM AS A SCHOOL OF POLITICAL ECONOMICS. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 4, 591–610. https://ajindex.com/articles/532975

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alston, L.J., B. Mueller (2008), ‘Property Rights and the State’, in Claude Menard and Mary M. Shirley (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Berlin: Springer, 573-590.
  2. Arthur, B.W. (1994), Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Michigan: Michigan University Press.
  3. Ayres, C.E. (1962), The Theory of Economic Progress: A Study of the Fundamentals of Economic Development and Cultural Change, New York: Schocken Books. Banathy, B.H. (1996), Designing Social Systems in a Changing World, New York: Plenum Press.
  4. Buiter, W. (2009), ‘Establishing a New Macro-Economic Policy Regime’, in Anton Hemerijck, Ben Knapen, and Ellen van Doorne (eds.), After Shocks: Economic Crisis and Institutional Choice, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 122-132.
  5. Burlamaqui, L. (2000), ‘Evolutionary Economics and the Economic Role of the State’, in Leonardo Burlamaqui, Ana Celia Castro and Ha-Joon Chang (eds.), Institutions and the Role of the state, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 27-52.
  6. Commons, J.R. (1970[1950),
  7. The Economics of Collective Action, Madison: The University of Wisconsin University Press.
  8. Commons, J.R. (1959), Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political Economy, Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
  9. Durkheim, E. (1994 [1893]), The Division of Labour in Society, Houndsmills: MacMillan. Fiorina, M. (1995), ‘Rational Choice and the New (?) Institutionalism’, Polity, 28(1), 107-115.
  10. Hall, P., C.R. Taylor (1996), ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Science, 44(5), 936-957.
  11. Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2004), The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism, London: Routledge. Jevons, Stanley (2005 [1888]), The Theory of Political Economy, Liberty Fund, http://oll.liberty fund.org/EBooks/Jevons0237.pdf. Kasper, W., Streit, Manfred E. (1998), Institutional Economics: Social Order and Public Policy, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham. Keynes, J.M. (1964[1936]),
  12. General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, XIX, London: H.Hamilton. Knight, J. (2001), ‘Explaning the Rise of Neoliberalism: The Mechanisms of Institutional Change’, in John L. Campbell and Ove K. Pedersen (eds.), The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 27-50.
  13. Lowndess, V. (1996), ‘Varieties of New Institutionalism: A Critical Appraisal’, Public Administration, 74, 181-197.
  14. Lucas, R. (1990), ‘Review of Trade Policy and Market Structure by E. Helpman and P. Krugman’