SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4

A NONLINEAR UNIT ROOT APPROACH TO MODELLING NEW MONETARY POLICY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

YENİ PARA POLİTİKASININ DOĞRUSAL OLMAYAN BİRİM KÖK YAKLAŞIMI İLE MODELLENMESİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Ayşen SİVRİKAYA
Şiyar CANPOLAT
Pages
695–719
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This result is consistent with the new monetary policy in Turkey in the aftermath of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we investigate the monetary policy reaction function regarding the post-2008 Global Financial Crisis using Turkish data over the period between 2009-2019.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The novelty of this study is that we circumvent the unit root problem by applying the nonlinear unit root test, developed by Leybourne et al. (1998).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This result is consistent with the new monetary policy in Turkey in the aftermath of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Para Politikası Reaksiyon Fonksiyonu · Spread · Geriye ve İleriye Bakış Davranışı

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the monetary policy reaction function regarding the post-2008 Global Financial Crisis using Turkish data over the period between 2009-2019. The novelty of this study is that we circumvent the unit root problem by applying the nonlinear unit root test, developed by Leybourne et al. (1998). The results imply that the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey attaches more importance to price stability than the output gap. Moreover, we find that the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey reacts to the real effective exchange rate, the gross foreign exchange reserves, the total credit volume of the banking sector, and the economic growth. This result is consistent with the new monetary policy in Turkey in the aftermath of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı 2008 Küresel Finansal Krizi sonrası döneme ilişkin Türkiye’nin para politikası reaksiyon fonksiyonunu 2009-2019 dönemi verilerini kullanarak tahmin etmektir. Bu amaçla, politika değişkeni Leybourne vd. (1998) tarafından geliştirilen doğrusal olmayan birim kök testi ile durağan olmayan yapısı dışlanarak durağan hale getirilmiştir. Çalışmada yürütülen reaksiyon fonksiyonu tahminlerine göre Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası (TCMB) fiyat istikrarına çıktı açığına göre daha fazla önem vermektedir. Ayrıca, TCMB’nin reel efektif döviz kuruna, brüt döviz rezervlerine, bankacılık sektörü toplam kredi hacmine ve ekonomik büyümeye tepki verdiği bulgularına ulaşılmıştır. Bu bulgular, 2008 Küresel Finansal Krizi sonrasında Türkiye’de uygulanmaya başlanan yeni para politikası ile tutarlıdır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SİVRİKAYA, A., CANPOLAT, Ş. (2022). A NONLINEAR UNIT ROOT APPROACH TO MODELLING NEW MONETARY POLICY: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4, 695–719. https://ajindex.com/articles/532917

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akyürek, C., A.M. Kutan, H. Yılmazkuday (2011), “Can Inflation Targeting Regimes be Effective in Developing Countries?, The Turkish Experience”, Journal of Asian Economics, 22, 343-355.
  2. Albayrak, N., Z. Abdioğlu (2015), “Geriye ve İleriye Dönük Para Politikası Reaksiyon Fonksiyonlarının Tahmini: Taylor Kuralı [Estimating backward and forward-looking monetary policy reaction functions: Taylor rule]”, Suleyman Demirel University the Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20(4), 141-163.
  3. Alioğulları, Z.H., Y.S. Başkaya, Y.E. Bulut, M. Kılınç (2015), The Relationship of Consumer and Commercial Loans with Current Account Deficit in Turkey, CBT Research Notes in Economics 1519, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey. Bacon, D.W., D.G. Watts (1971), “Estimating the Transition between two Intersecting Straight Lines”, Biometrika, 58(3), 525-534.
  4. Ball, L.M. (1999), “PolicyRrules for Open Economies”, in J.B. Taylor (ed.), Monetary Policy Rules, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 127-156.
  5. Becker, R., W. Enders, J. Lee (2006), “A Stationarity Test in the Presence of an unknown Number of Smooth Breaks”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381-409.
  6. Bernanke, B. (1990), On the Predictive Power of Interest Rates and Interest Rate Spreads, NBER Working Paper No: 3486. Berument, H. (2007), “Measuring Monetary Policy for a Small Open Economy: Turkey”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 29, 411-430.
  7. Berument, H., K. Malatyalı (2000), “The Implicit Reaction Function of the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey”, Applied Economics Letters, 7, 425-430.
  8. Berument, H., H. Taşçı (2004), “Monetary Policy rules in Practice: Evidence from Turkey”, International Journal of Finance and Economics, 9, 33-38.
  9. Berument, M.H., N.B. Ceylan, B. Doğan (2014), “An Interest-Rate-Spread-Based Measure of Turkish Monetary Policy”, Applied Economics, 46(15), 1804-1813.
  10. Bierens, H.J. (1997), “Testing the Unit Root with Drift Hypothesis Against Nonlinear Trend Stationarity, with an Application to the US Price Level and Interest Rate”, Journal of Econometrics, 81, 29-64.
  11. Canzoneri, M.B., R.E. Cumby, B.T. Diba (2007), “Euler Equations and Money Market Interest Rates: A Challenge for Monetary Policy Models”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 1863–1881.
  12. Castro, V. (2011), “Can Central Banks’ Monetary Policy be Described by a Linear (augmented) Taylor Rule or by a Nonlinear Rule?”, Journal of Financial Stability, 7, 228-246.
  13. Castro, V., R.M. Sou