SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 2012 - Sayı: 42

The effect of generative multimedia learning environment on teacher candidates' achievement, attitude and retention according to their learning styles

Türetimci çoklu ortamın öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme stillerine göre başarı, tutum ve kalıcılığa etkisi

Ayhan YILMAZ
Sinem ÖZGÜR DİNÇOL
Pages
441–452
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found as a result of the study that multimedia learning environment applications caused a statistically significant increase in achievement and attitude scores of the chemistry teacher candidates and retention of learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, it was aimed to examine the effect of the designed generative multimedia learning environment on achievement, attitude and retention according to teacher candidates' learning styles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The one group pretest-posttest design was used in the study. 31 teacher candidates, who were studying in Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education, and Department of Chemistry Education during 2010 - 2011 academic year's fall term, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found as a result of the study that multimedia learning environment applications caused a statistically significant increase in achievement and attitude scores of the chemistry teacher candidates and retention of learning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 - 2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the study, it was aimed to examine the effect of the designed generative multimedia learning environment on achievement, attitude and retention according to teacher candidates' learning styles. The one group pretest-posttest design was used in the study. 31 teacher candidates, who were studying in Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education, and Department of Chemistry Education during 2010 - 2011 academic year's fall term, were included in the study. Kolb Learning Styles' Inventory, Achievement Test about Chemical Bonds and Chemistry Attitude Scale were used in the study as a data collection tool. It was found as a result of the study that multimedia learning environment applications caused a statistically significant increase in achievement and attitude scores of the chemistry teacher candidates and retention of learning. However, any statistically significant difference was not observed in the teacher candidates' achievement, attitude and retention according to their learning styles.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı tasarlanan türetimci çoklu ortamın öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme stillerine göre başarı, tutum ve kalıcılığa olan etkisini incelemektir. Çalışmada "tek grup ön test-son test araştırma deseni" kullanılmıştır. Çalışmaya 2010-2011 Güz döneminde Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, Kimya Eğitimi Anabilim Dalında okuyan 31 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Veri toplama aracı olarak; Kolb Öğrenme Stilleri Envanteri (KÖSE), Kimyasal Bağlar Başarı Testi (KBBT) ve Kimya Tutum Ölçeği (KTÖ) kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda; çoklu ortam uygulamalarının Kimya öğretmen adaylarının başarı ve tutum puanlarında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir artışa neden olduğu; kalıcı öğrenmelerin sağlandığı tespit edilmiştir. Ancak öğretmen adaylarının başarı, tutum ve kalıcılıklarında öğrenme stillerine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, A., DİNÇOL, S. Ö. (2022). The effect of generative multimedia learning environment on teacher candidates' achievement, attitude and retention according to their learning styles. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2012 - Sayı: 42, 441–452. https://ajindex.com/articles/532610

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Akkoyunlu, B. ve Yılmaz, M. (2005). Türetimci çoklu ortam öğrenme kuramı. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 9-18.
  2. Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. T. (2001). Multimedia for learning, methods & development (3rd Edition). Ally &Bacon, A Pearson Education Company. Aşkar, P. ve Akkoyunlu, B. (1993). Kolb öğrenme stili envanteri. Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 87 (17), 37-47.
  3. Ayersman, D.J. (1996). Reviewing the research on hypermedia-based learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28 (4), 500-576.
  4. Bahar, M. ve Bilgin, İ. (2003). Öğrenme stillerini irdeleyen biı^ literatür çalışması. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1, 41 - 70. Barnea, N., & Dori, Y J. (2000). Computerized molecular modeling: The new technology for enhance model perception among chemistry educators and learners. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe, 1,109-120.
  5. Baykara Pehlivan, K. (2010). A study on prospective teachers' learning styles and their attitudes toward teaching profession. Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 749- 763. Beck, C. R. (2001). Matching teaching strategies to learning style preferences. The Teacher Educator, 37(1), 1-15.
  6. Bilgin, İ. ve Durmuş, S. (2003). Öğrenme stilleri ve öğrenci başarısı arasındaki ilişki üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir araştırma. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 3 (2), 381-400.
  7. Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Cano-Garcia, F., & Hughes, E.H. (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analyis of their interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 20 (4), 413-430.
  8. Carpi, A. (2001). Improvements in undergraduate science education using web-based instructional modules: the natural science pages. Journal of Chemical Education, 78, 1709-1712.
  9. Cohen, V.L. (1997). Learning styles in a tecnology-rich environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29 (4), 338-350.
  10. Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners' mental models of ionic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 464-486.
  11. Collison, E. (2000). A survey of elementary students' learning style preferences and academic success. Contemporary Education, 71 (4), 42-49.
  12. Çilenti, K. (1984). Eğitim teknolojisi ve öğretim. Ankara:
  13. Kadıoğlu Matbaası. Ekici, G. (2003). Öğrenme st