SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 2004 - Sayı: 26

Bilgisayar Ortamındaki Çoğul Bağlantılı Gösterimlerin Öğrencilerin Doğrusal İlişkileri Öğrenmeleri Üzerindeki Etkileri

The Effects of Multiple Linked Representations on Students' Learning of Linear Relationships

S. Aslı KOCA ÖZGÜN
Pages
82–90
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The conclusion of this study was that semi-linked representations could be as effective as linked representations and that there was a role for each in different situations, at different levels, and with different mathematical concepts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The focus of this study was on comparing three groups of Algebra I 9th-year students: one group using linked representation software, the second group using similar software but with semi-linked representations, and the control group in order to examine the effects on students' understanding of linear relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data collection methods included mathematics pre- and posttests, follow-up interviews, computer-based clinical interviews at the end of the treatment, classroom and lab observations, document analysis, and survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The conclusion of this study was that semi-linked representations could be as effective as linked representations and that there was a role for each in different situations, at different levels, and with different mathematical concepts.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The focus of this study was on comparing three groups of Algebra I 9th-year students: one group using linked representation software, the second group using similar software but with semi-linked representations, and the control group in order to examine the effects on students' understanding of linear relationships. Data collection methods included mathematics pre- and posttests, follow-up interviews, computer-based clinical interviews at the end of the treatment, classroom and lab observations, document analysis, and survey. The conclusion of this study was that semi-linked representations could be as effective as linked representations and that there was a role for each in different situations, at different levels, and with different mathematical concepts.

Özet

Bu çalışma, 9.sınıf cebir öğrencilerinin doğrusal ilişkiler konusunu öğrenmelerinde bilgisayar kullanımının etkilerini incelemiştir. Bu amaç ile bağlantılı ve yarı bağlantılı gösterim yazılımı kullanan iki deney ve bir kontrol grubu karşılaştırılmıştır. Veri toplama yöntemleri matematik ön ve son testleri, uygulama sonrası mülakatları ve bilgisayar ortamındaki klinik mülakatları, sınıf ve laboratuvar gözlemleri, doküman analizi ve matematiksel gösterimleri tercih anketinden oluşmuştur. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, yarı bağlantılı gösterimlerin bağlantılı gösterimler kadar etkili olabileceğini ve her ikisinin de farklı durumlarda, değişik sınıf seviyelerinde ve matematik konularında kullanımı olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGÜN, S. A. K. (2022). Bilgisayar Ortamındaki Çoğul Bağlantılı Gösterimlerin Öğrencilerin Doğrusal İlişkileri Öğrenmeleri Üzerindeki Etkileri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2004 - Sayı: 26, 82–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/532517

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Borba, M. De C. (1993). Students' understanding of transformations of functions using multireprese'ntational software (Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53(11), Z3832. Borba, M., & Confrey, J. (1993). The role of the teaching experiment: Students' construction of transformations in a multi-representational environment. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 374 977) Brenner, M. E., Brar, T., Duran, R., Mayer, R. E., Moseley, B., Smith, B. R., & Webb, D: (1995). The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 391 659) Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, and N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 107-122).
  2. Reston, VA: NCTM. Dienes, Z. P. (1960). Building up mathematics. Great Britain: Anchor Press, Hutchinson Educational. Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N., and Belanger, M. (1987). Pedagogical, considerations concerning the problem of representation. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 109-122).
  3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Dyer, D. M. (1995). The effects of computer and non-computer based instruction on symbolic, graphic, and numerical representations of mathematical functions in applied college algebra. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(11), Z3438. Goldin, G. A. (1990). Epistemology, constructivism, and discovery learning mathematics. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, and N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 31-47).
  4. Reston, VA: NCTM. Harel, G. (1989). Applying the principle of multiple embodiments in teaching linear algebra: Aspects of familiarity and mode of representation. School Science and Mathematics, 89(1), 49-57.
  5. Hiebert, J. and Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97).
  6. New York, NY: Macmillan. Jiang, Z. & Mcclintock, E. (2000). Multiple approaches to problem solving and the use of technology. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 79(1), 7-20.
  7. Kaput, J. J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515-556).
  8. New York, NY: M