Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

Graduate Students' Perspectives on the Qualities of Innovative Teachers

Lisansüstü Öğrencilerin Yenilikçi Öğretmen Özelliklerine İlişkin Görüşleri

Pages
644–655
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is hoped that the findings of the study provide an insight into a discussion about the issue Keywords: innovation, innovative teacher, graduate students, qualitative research, professional development

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:ABSTRACT: This qualitative study aims to explore to determine the views of graduate students on the features of ‘innovative teachers’.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants comprised of 36 graduate students (15 masters and 20 doctorates) who enrolled in a graduate program on education in a state university in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is hoped that the findings of the study provide an insight into a discussion about the issue Keywords: innovation, innovative teacher, graduate students, qualitative research, professional development
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This qualitative study aims to explore to determine the views of graduate students on the features of ‘innovative teachers’. The participants comprised of 36 graduate students (15 masters and 20 doctorates) who enrolled in a graduate program on education in a state university in Turkey. Depending on the findings obtained through an open-ended questionnaire and content analysis process, the following categories are formed: technology use, renewing oneself, openness to developments, motivation, collaboration with colleagues, student centered thinking and guidance. Additionally, most of the participants expressed that they regard themselves as innovative. It is hoped that the findings of the study provide an insight into a discussion about the issue Keywords: innovation, innovative teacher, graduate students, qualitative research, professional development

Özet

Bu nitel araştırmanın temel amacı lisanüstü öğrencilerin ‘yenilikçi öğretmen’ özelliklerine ilişkin bakış açılarını belirlemektir. Araştırmada çalışma grubunu, 15 yüksek lisans ve 20 doktora öğrencisi olmak üzere toplam 25 lisansüstü öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Açık uçlu sorular ile içerik analizi sonucunda elde edilen bulgulara bağlı olarak, aşağıdaki kategoriler oluşturulmuştur: (1) teknoloji kullanımı (2) kendini yenilemek (3) gelişmelere açık olmak (4) motivasyon (5) meslektaşlar ile işbirliği (6) öğrenci merkezli düşünmek (7) rehberlik. Ayrıca, katılımcıların çoğu kendilerini yenilikçi olarak vurgulamışlardır. Araştırma sonuçlarının, bu konudaki tartışmalara bir bakış açısı sağlayacağı umulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAKMAK, M., BUDAK, Y., KAYABAŞI, Y. (2022). Graduate Students' Perspectives on the Qualities of Innovative Teachers. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 644–655. https://ajindex.com/articles/532267

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Alter, N. (2000) L’innovation ordinaire. Paris: PUF. Anderson, C. (2010) Presenting and evaluating qualitative research, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74(8), 141. Arseven, A.D. (2001). Alan araştırma yöntemi: ilkeler, teknikler, örnekler. Ankara: Gündüz Eğitim ve Yayıncılık. Avidov-Ungar, O. and Eshet-Alkakay, Y. (2011) Teachers in a world of change: teachers' knowledge and attitudes towards the implementation of innovative technologies in schools, Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7. Başaran, S.D. & Keleş, S. (2015) Yenilikçi Kimdir? Öğretmenlerin Yenilikçilik Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi [Who Is Innovative? Examination of Teachers’ Innovativeness Level], Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), 30(4), 106-118.
  2. Beegan, L. (2014) A study into innovation within an educational context including teachers’ perceptions of innovation within their own schools, The STeP Journal, 1(1),48-57.
  3. Blanquer, J.M. (2010) Innover et expérimenter, est-ce très académique? Les Cahiers Innover et Réussir. n°15 Editeur: CRDP Créteil. Bramwell, G. Reilly, R. C. Lilly, F. R. Kronish, N. & Chennabathni, R. (2011). Creative teacher. Roeper Review, 33(1), 228-238.
  4. Choon-Keong, T., Aris, B.; Harun, J. & Kean-Wah, L. (2012) Enhancing and assessing student teachers' creativity using brainstorming activities and ICT-based morphological analysis method, Academic Research International, 2(1), 241-250.
  5. Cordonier, N. (2011). Epistémologie du «sujet enseignant », dans son rôle d'évaluateur de compétences, Revue International de Pédagogie et de L’enseignement Supérieur,27, 2. Creativite et Innovation. (2013). Année européenne de la Créativité et de l’Innovation http://www.creativite-innovation2009.fr (Retrived at December, 2013)
  6. Del Val, M. P., & Fuentes, C. M. (2003). Resistance to change: A literature review and empirical study. Management Decision, 41(12), 148-155.
  7. Gorozidis, G. & Papaioannou, A.G. (2014) Teachers' motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations, Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 1-11.
  8. Heather, D., Hartshorne, R & Gail R. (2010). Being an innovative teacher: preservice teachers’ conceptions of technology and innovation, International Journal of Education, 2(1). Hosseini, A.S. (2014) The effect of creativity model for creativity development in teachers, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 4(2). Jaskyte, K., Taylor, H. & Smariga, H. (2009) Student and f