SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 2011 - Sayı: 40

Comparing and contrasting the locus of control and risk tendency levels of the personnel working in two different state institutions

İki farklı meslek grubunda çalışan personelin denetim odağı ve risk eğilimi düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması

Muammer ERGÜN
Ömer ERDOĞAN
Pages
176–185
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it is found that, there is a positive correlation (r=.112; p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to compare the employees of two different occupational groups in terms of risk tendency and locus of control and investigation of the relationship between locus of control and risk taking tendency.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, 263 male teachers who work in Kastamonu as personnel of Ministry of Education and 168 policemen who also work in Kastamonu as personnel of City Police Department are studied with.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it is found that, there is a positive correlation (r=.112; p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to compare the employees of two different occupational groups in terms of risk tendency and locus of control and investigation of the relationship between locus of control and risk taking tendency. For this purpose, 263 male teachers who work in Kastamonu as personnel of Ministry of Education and 168 policemen who also work in Kastamonu as personnel of City Police Department are studied with. Locus of Control Scale, the Arnett Inventory of Sensation Seeking and Personal Information Form are applied to the participants. SPSS (11.00) pack program is used for the analysis of the gathered data. According to the results, it is found that, there is a positive correlation (r=.112; p

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı; iki farklı meslek grubunda çalışanların risk eğilimi ve denetim odağı açısından karşılaştırılması ve risk alma eğilimi ile denetim odağı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesidir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Kastamonu İli Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü'ne bağlı olarak görev yapan 263 erkek öğretmen ve Kastamonu İli Emniyet Müdürlüğü'ne bağlı görev yapan 168 erkek polis ile çalışılmıştır. Çalışmaya katılanlara Denetim Odağı Ölçeği, Arnet Heyecan Arama Ölçeği ve kişisel bilgi formu uygulanmış bunlardan elde edilen bulgular SPSS (11.00) istatistik programı ile değerlendirilmiştir. Değerlendirme sonuçlarına göre; risk alma eğilimi ile denetim odağı arasında pozitif yönlü (r=.112; P

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN, M., ERDOĞAN, Ö. (2022). Comparing and contrasting the locus of control and risk tendency levels of the personnel working in two different state institutions. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2011 - Sayı: 40, 176–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/532253

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Atlı, Ö. (2002). Yetişkin kadınların meme kanserine yönelik bilgi düzeyleri ve risk algılamaları ile kendi kendine meme muayenesi eğitiminin değerlendirilmesi.İstanbul: Marmara üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Aydınay, A. (1996). İş Tatmini İle Denetim Odağı Arasındaki İlişki (Resmi, Özel,Yabancı Özel Lise Öğretmenleri Üzerinde Yapılmış Bir Araştırma). Marmara Üniversitesi,
  2. Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Eğitimde Psikolojik Hizmetler Bilim Dalı.Yaymlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
  3. Basim, H.N. & Şeşen, H. (2007). Are They Equal? Comparison of Turkish and English Job Announcements in Terms of Some Discrimination Factors. Humanity &Social Sciences Journal, 2(1): 34-42.
  4. Beyth-Marom, R., Austin, L., FischhoV, B., Palmgren, C., & Quadrel, M. J. (1993). Perceived consequences of risky behaviors: adults and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 29, 549-563.
  5. Beyth-Marom, R. & Fischho, V. B. (1997). Adolescents decisions about risks: a cognitive perspective. In J. Schulenberg & J. L. Maggs (Eds.), Health Risks and Developmental Transitions in Adolescence. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Blau, G. (1993). Testing The Relationships of Lous of Control to Different Performance Dimensions. Journal of Occuptional and Organizational Psychology, 66, 125-135.
  7. Butterfıeld, E. C. (1964). Locus of control, test anxiety, reactions to frustration, and achievement attitudes. Journal of Personcdity, 32, 298—311. Byrnes, J. P. (1998). The nature and development of decision making: a self-regulation model. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Cohen, P. A., Sheposh, J. P., & Hillix, W. A. (1979). Situational and personality influences on risk-taking behavior: Effects of task, sex, and locus of control. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 1, 63-67.
  8. Covello, V.T. (2001). Risk communication, the west nile virus epidemic and bioterrorism: Responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting. Journal of Urban Health, 78 (2),382-391
  9. Crisp, B.R. & Barber, J.G. ( 1995). The effect of locus of control on the association between risk perception and sexual risk-taking, Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 841-845. Dağ,İ. (1991). Rotte'in İç-Dış Kontrol Odağı Ölçeği (RİDKOÖ)'nin Üniversite Öğrencileri İçin Güvenirliği ve Geçerliliği, Psikoloji Dergisi, 7 (26), 10-16
  10. Dağ, İ. (2002). Kontrol Odağı Ölçeği (KOÖ): Ölçek Geliştirme, Güvenirlik