SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 2012 - Sayı: 43

A study for the development of attitude scale towards daily life chemistry

Günlük yaşam kimyası tutum ölçeği geliştirme çalışması

Canan KOÇAK
Ayşem Seda ÖNEN
Pages
318–329
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, the final version of the scale was found to be reliable and valid in terms of determining the attitudes of secondary school students towards daily life chemistry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to develop an attitude scale towards daily life chemistry for secondary school students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The pilot study carried out with the participation of 426 secondary school students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, the final version of the scale was found to be reliable and valid in terms of determining the attitudes of secondary school students towards daily life chemistry.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop an attitude scale towards daily life chemistry for secondary school students. The pilot study carried out with the participation of 426 secondary school students. The process of developing the Daily Life Chemistry Attitude Scale consists of a literature review, creating an item pool, taking expert opinions and a pilot study. The Cronbach Alplin reliability coefficient of the scale was calculated to be .88 and the conclusions of the factor analysis supported the structure with 5 subdimensions. In other words, the final version of the scale was found to be reliable and valid in terms of determining the attitudes of secondary school students towards daily life chemistry.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin günlük yaşam kimyasına yönelik' tutumlarını belirlemek için bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Pilot uygulama 426 öğrencinin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Günlük Yaşam Kimyası Tutum Ölçeğini geliştirme süreci literatür taraması, madde havuzu oluşturma, uzman görüşü alma ve pilot uygulama aşamalarını içermektedir. Ölçeğin Cronbach Alpha güvenirlik katsayısı 0.88 olarak hesaplanmış ve faktör analizi sonuçlan ölçeğin beş boyutlu bir yapıya sahip olduğunu desteklemiştir. Başka bir ifadeyle ölçek. Ortaöğretim Öğrencilerinin günlük yaşam kimyasına yönelik tutumlarını belirlemede geçerli ve güvenilir bir araçtır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇAK, C., ÖNEN, A. S. (2022). A study for the development of attitude scale towards daily life chemistry. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2012 - Sayı: 43, 318–329. https://ajindex.com/articles/532202

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Acar B. & Yaman M. (20li). Bağlam lemelli öğrenmenin öğrencilerin İlgi ve bilgi düzeylerine etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, l-lü. Aikenhead, G. (2005). Science for everyday life: evidence-based practice. Teachers College Press:
  2. New York. Anderson, L.W. (1988). Likert scales educational research, methodology and measurement. An international handbook. Ed. John P. Keeves. New York: Pergoman. Barker, V. & Millar, R. (1999). Students' reasoning about chemical reactions: what changes ocur during a context-based post-16 chemistry course? International Journal of Science Education, 21, 645-665.
  3. Baş, T. (2005). An kel: nasıl hazırlanır, uygulanır, değerlendirilir? Seçkin Yayıncılık: Ankara. Becker,.1. (1978). Clıemie-ein unbeliebtes schullach? ergebnisse und motive der fachbeliebtheit. In: MNU, 8, 455-459.
  4. Bennett, J. (2003). Context-based approaches to the teaching of science. In teaching and learning science. London, UK: Continuum. Bulte. A.M.W., Westbroek, H.B., De Jong. O. & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (9), 1063-1086.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. PegemA Yayıncılık: Ankara.
  6. Campbell, B. & Lubben, F. (2000). Learning science through contexts: helping pupils make sense of everyday situations. International Journal of Science Education, 22 (3). 239- 252. Demircioğlu. H., Demircioğlıı. G. & Ayas. A. (2006). Hikayeler ve kimya öğretimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 110-119. Demutlı, 11. Ralle. B. & Parchmanıı I. (2005). Basiskonzepte - eine hcraıısforderung an den chemieıuıterricht. CHEMKON. 12(2). 55-60.
  7. Fensham. P.I. (2009). Real world contexts in pisa science: implications forcontext-based science education. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 46(8). 884-896.
  8. Gendjova A. (2007). Enhancing students' interest in chemistry by home experiments. Journal Of Baltic Science Education, 6(3). Gilbert, J.K. (2006). On the nature of "context" in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9),957-976.
  9. Gilbert., J. Iv„ Bulte, A. M. W. & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context-based scicnce education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817-837. Hair,.1. Anderson, R.E., Tatham. R.L. & Black, W.C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. (6th ed.), Prenctice Hall, Upper Saddle River: New Jersey.