SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 2012 - Sayı: 43

Üniversite öğrencilerinin çevreciliği: Çevreye yönelik etik tutumları

The environmentalism of university students: Their ethical attitudes toward the environment

Oğuz ÖZDEMİR
Pages
373–385
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In light of the findings, it can be argued that the participants mostly exhibit a "mild" environmental ism tendency that pays attention to both the instrumental and intrinsic values of non-human entities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study tries to determine the environmentalism of university students based on their attitudes towards the environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study was carried out among 220 senior students studying in various departments in ->007-2008 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In light of the findings, it can be argued that the participants mostly exhibit a "mild" environmental ism tendency that pays attention to both the instrumental and intrinsic values of non-human entities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The study tries to determine the environmentalism of university students based on their attitudes towards the environment. The present study was carried out among 220 senior students studying in various departments in ->007-2008 academic year. The data were collected through an "Environmental Ethics" scale developed by the researcher and were analyzed through proper statistics from SPSS program package. In light of the findings, it can be argued that the participants mostly exhibit a "mild" environmental ism tendency that pays attention to both the instrumental and intrinsic values of non-human entities.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, üniversite öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik etik tutumlarından hareketle çevrecilikleri belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırma, 2007/2008 döneminde çeşitli programlarda öğrenim gören son sınıf öğrencileri (n: 220) üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Veriler, araştırmacı t aralından geliştirilen "Çevre Etiği Ölçe-gi"nin uygulanmasıyla toplanmış ve elde edilen veriler SPSS bilgisayar ortamında uygun istatistiksel teknikler kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonunda, katılımcıların çoğunun insanın dışındaki varlıkların araçsal ve içsel değerlerini önemseyen "ılımlı" çevrecilik eğiliminde oldukları belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDEMİR, O. (2022). Üniversite öğrencilerinin çevreciliği: Çevreye yönelik etik tutumları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2012 - Sayı: 43, 373–385. https://ajindex.com/articles/532197

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Arcury, T.A. (1990). Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Human Organization. 49(4). 300-304.
  2. Binbacher, D. (1999). Doğadan sorumlu muyuz? Çev.: İsmail İşceıı. Felsefe Logos 2 (6). Bögeholz, S. (2006). Nature experience and its importance for environmental knowledge, values and action: recent German empricai contributions. Environmental Education Research, 12 (J), 65-84.
  3. Devall, B. (2006). The end of American environmental ism. Nature and Culture, 1(2), 157-180.
  4. Dietz, T., Kalof, L.& Stem, P. C. (2002). Gender, values and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 83 (I), 353-364.
  5. Dunlap, R.I:. & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
  6. Eekersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: toward an ecoceiuric approach. New York: State University of New York Press.
  7. Eilen, S. (2008). Insights to ecocentric.antropocentric and antipathetic towards environment in diverse cultures, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 8 (33), 141-156.
  8. Ferry, L.(2000). Ekolojikyenidüzen. Çev.: Turhan İlgaz. İstanbul:
  9. C'ogito, Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  10. Hardin, G. (1968).
  11. The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, 1243- 124S. Horwitz, W. (1994). Characteristics of environmental ethics: environmental avtivists'accounts, Ethics _____£- Behavior, 4(4), 345-367. Horwitz. W. (200 [). Environmental dilemmas: the resolutions of student activists, Ethics t£ Behavior, 10 (3), 281-308. Huebert. J.H. & Block, W. (2007). Space environmentalism, property rights and the law, The University of Memphis Law Review, 37 (7), 281-309.
  12. Inglehart, R. (1995). Changing values, economic development and political change, International Social Science Journal, 145, 379-403.
  13. Jardins, J.R. (2006). Çevre etiğİ. (Çev.: R. ICcleş), Ankara:
  14. İmge Kİtabevi. Kortenkamp, K. & Moore, C. F. (2001). Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21. 261-272.
  15. Leopold, A. (1987). A sand country almanac, and sketches here and there. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  16. Murdy, W.H. (1975). Anthropocentrism: a modern version. Science 187, 1168-1172.
  17. Nordlund, A.M. & Garvill. J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34 (6), 740-756. Passmore, j. (1974). Man's responsibility for nature: ecological problems and western traditions. New York: Charles Scribners Sons. Pepper, D. (1984). The roots of modem environmetalism. London