Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 2012 - Sayı: 42

The efficacy dialect awareness training on the attitudes of prospective Turkish teachers towards the anatolian dialects

Ağız farkındalığı eğitiminin Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının Anadolu ağızlarına yönelik tutumlarına etkisi

Pages
321–333
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found out that there is a significant difference in favour of experimental group according to the results of the "Anatolian dialects attitude scale consisting of sub scales such as "the place and function of dialects in education", "attitude towards dialect users", "emotional value about dialect use" and "attitudes towards the status of dialects".

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to indicate the effect of the dialect awareness training on the attitudes of the prospective Turkish teachers towards Anatolian dialects.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experimental group received dialect awareness training two hours a week during 14 weeks whereas the control group received no training.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found out that there is a significant difference in favour of experimental group according to the results of the "Anatolian dialects attitude scale consisting of sub scales such as "the place and function of dialects in education", "attitude towards dialect users", "emotional value about dialect use" and "attitudes towards the status of dialects".
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the study is to indicate the effect of the dialect awareness training on the attitudes of the prospective Turkish teachers towards Anatolian dialects. To this end, the pretest - posttest control group design was used in this experimental study. The experimental group received dialect awareness training two hours a week during 14 weeks whereas the control group received no training. The "Anatolian dialects attitude scale (ADAS) with the parts: "the place and function of dialects in education", "attitude towards dialect users", "emotional value about dialect use" and "attitudes towards the status of dialects"." was administered as a pretest and posttest. It was found out that there is a significant difference in favour of experimental group according to the results of the "Anatolian dialects attitude scale consisting of sub scales such as "the place and function of dialects in education", "attitude towards dialect users", "emotional value about dialect use" and "attitudes towards the status of dialects".

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, ağız farkındalığı eğitiminin Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının "Anadolu ağızlarına yönelik tutumları"na etkisini ortaya koymaktır. Bu temel amaç doğrultusunda çalışmada araştırmada öntest-sontest kontrol gruplu deneysel desen kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada deney grubuna haftada iki saat olmak üzere 14 hafta boyunca ağız farkındalığı eğitimi uygulanmıştır. Kontrol grubunda ise herhangi bir uygulama yapılmamıştır. Deney (N= 21) ve kontrol (N= 19) gruplarındaki öğrencilere ağızların eğitimdeki yeri ve işlevi", "ağız kullanıcılarına yönelik tutum" "ağız kullanımına yönelik duygusal değer", "ağızların statüsüne yönelik tutum" alt ölçeklerinden oluşan Anadolu Ağızlarına Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği (AAYTÖ) öntest ve sontest olarak uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada AAYTÖ ve ağızların eğitimdeki yeri ve işlevi", "ağız kullanıcılarına yönelik tutum" "ağız kullanımına yönelik duygusal değer", "ağızların statüsüne yönelik tutum" alt ölçeklerinde deney grubu lehine sonuçlar ortaya çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

PEHLİVAN, A. (2022). The efficacy dialect awareness training on the attitudes of prospective Turkish teachers towards the anatolian dialects. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2012 - Sayı: 42, 321–333. https://ajindex.com/articles/532190

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adger, T., C., Wolfram, W., & Christian, D. (2007). Dialect in schools and communities. London: LEA Publishers.
  2. Baker, C. (1995). Attitudes and languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Ball.F. A.,& Muhammad, J. R. (2003). Language diversity in teacher education and in the clasroom. In G. Smitherman & V. Villanueva. (Eds.), Language diversity in the classroom (pp. 76-88). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  3. Bonate, P.L. (2000). Analysis of pretest-posttest designs. Boca Ration: Chapman and Hall. Botsali, 1.(1995). Attitudes of university students from different educational, social, and geographical backgrounds towards Turkish variaties. Unpublished master disertation, Hacettepe university, Ankara.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Deneysel desenler öntest - sontest kontrol grubu desen ve veri analizi. Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  6. Pegem Akademi. Byrness, A. D., Kiger, G., & Manning, M. L. (1997). Teachers' attitudes about language diversity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, (6), 637-644.
  7. Cheshire, J. (1982). Dialect features and linguistic conflict in schools. Educational Review, 34 (1), 53-67.
  8. Cheshire, J., Edwards, V., Münstermann, H., & Welttens, B. (1989). Dialect and education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Corson, D. (2001). Language diversity and education. Mahwah: LEA Publishers.
  9. Cots, M. J.,& Nussbaum, L. (1999): Schooling, language and teachers: language awareness and the discourse of the educational reform in Catalonia. Language Awareness, 8 (3-4), 174-189.
  10. Craig, D. R. (1983). Teaching standard English to nonstandard speakers: some methodological issues. Journal of Negro Education, 52 (1), 65-74.
  11. Davies, V. W. (2000). Language awareness amongst teachers in a central German dialect area. Language Awareness, 9 (3), 119-134.
  12. Dawaele, J.-M. (2005). Sociodemographic, psychological and politicultural correlates in Flemish students' attitudes towards French and English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 2, 118-137.
  13. Demirci, M. (2002). Gender differences in the perception of Turkish regional dialects. In L. Daniel & D. R: Priston (Eds.), Hanbook of perceptual dialectology 2 (pp. 41-50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Demirci, M.,& Brian K. (1999). The perception of Turkish dialects. In D. R. Priston (Ed.), Hanbook of Perceptual Dialectology 1 (pp 263-282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Edwards, J. (1989). Language and disadvantage. London: Cole&Whurr. Fairclough