SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 2012 - Sayı: 42

Pre-service biology teachers' pedagogical content knowledge regarding teaching evolution

Biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının evrim öğretimine ilişkin pedagojik alan bilgileri

Dilek Sultan KILIÇ
Ceren TEKKAYA
Pages
406–417
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study has some important implications for pre-service teacher preparation

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This case study attempted to investigate senior pre-service biology teachers' pedagogical content knowledge, concerns, attitudes, and intensions related to teaching evolution in high school biology classes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants although found to be fairly knowledgeable about students' difficulties, and had general ideas about measurement and evaluation techniques and instructional strategies, were unaware of the place of evolution in biology curricula and lacked necessary knowledge related to evolution and nature of science.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study has some important implications for pre-service teacher preparation
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This case study attempted to investigate senior pre-service biology teachers' pedagogical content knowledge, concerns, attitudes, and intensions related to teaching evolution in high school biology classes. Beside, their NOS understandings were explored. Data collected from seven senior pre-service biology teachers through individual semi-structured interviews. Participants although found to be fairly knowledgeable about students' difficulties, and had general ideas about measurement and evaluation techniques and instructional strategies, were unaware of the place of evolution in biology curricula and lacked necessary knowledge related to evolution and nature of science. Moreover, they seemed to harbor some doubt about their PCK necessary to teach evolution effectively and shared several concerns regarding teaching of this topic in their future biology classes. This study has some important implications for pre-service teacher preparation

Özet

Çalışmada biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının evrim konusunu öğretmeye ilişkin pedagojik alan bilgileri, evrim öğretimine yönelik tutum, niyet ve kaygıları ile bilimin doğası hakkındaki görüşleri incelenmiştir. Yedi biyoloji öğretmen adayından oluşan bu araştırmanın yöntemi örnek olaydır. Veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler ile toplanmıştır. Bulgular adaylarının ölçme-değerlendirme yöntemleri, öğrencilerin anlama güçlükleri ve öğretim stratejileri hakkında genel bilgileri olmasına rağmen, müfredat bilgilerinin yetersiz olduğunu ve evrimin öğretimi ile ilgili çeşitli kaygılar taşıdığını ortaya koymuştur. Evrim ve bilimin doğası konularında kavram yanılgıları olduğu saptanan adayların evrim öğretime yönelik olumlu tutum geliştirdikleri belirlenmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının evrim konusunu öğretmeye ilişkin pedagojik alan bilgileri ile bilimin doğası hakkındaki görüşlerin geliştirilmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, D. S., TEKKAYA, C. (2022). Pre-service biology teachers' pedagogical content knowledge regarding teaching evolution. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2012 - Sayı: 42, 406–417. https://ajindex.com/articles/532136

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akyol, G., Sungur, S. & Tekkaya C. (2010). The contribution of understandings of evolutionary theory and nature of science to pre-service scienceteachers' acceptance of evolutionary theory. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9,1889-1893.
  2. Asghar, A., Wiles, J., & Alters, B. (2007). Discovering international perspectives on biological evolution across religions and cultures. International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities, and Nations, 6, 81-88.
  3. Banet, E. & Ayuso, G.E. (2003) Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 373-407.
  4. Beardsley, P.M., (2004). Middle school student learning in evolution: Are current standards achievable? The American Biology Teacher, 66, 604-612.
  5. BouJaoude S., Asghar, A., Wiles, J.R., Jaber, L., Sarieddine, D. & Alters, B. (2011). Biology professors' and teachers' positions regarding biological evolution and evolution education in a Middle Eastern Society. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 979-1000
  6. De Jong, O. (2000). The teacher trainer as researcher: Exploring the initial pedagogical content concerns of prospective science teachers'. European Journal of Teacher Education, 23, 127-137
  7. Fuller, F. F. & Bown, O. H. (1975). Becoming a teacher, in: K. RYAN (Ed) Teacher Education: the 47th Yearbook of theNSSE, Part II, pp. 25-52 (Chicago, Rand McNally). Graf, D. & Soran, H. (2011). Einstellung und Wissen von Lehramtstudierenden zur Evolution - ein Vergleich zwischen Deutschland und der Türkei. Graf, D. (Hrsg.), Evolutionstheorie-Akzeptanz und Vermittlung im europâischen Vergleich, Tagungsband Einstellung und Wissen zu Evolution und Wissenschaft in Europa (s.141-161). Heidelberg: Springer. Graf, D., Tekkaya, C., Kılıç, D.S. & Özcan, G. (April, 2011). Alman ve Türk fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının evrim öğretimine ilişkin pedagojik alan bilgisinin, tutumlarının ve pedagojik alan kaygılarının araştırılması, 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Antalya, 418-425.
  8. Griffith, J.A & Brem, S.K. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology: pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47,791-809.
  9. Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 109-120. Kâpylâ, M., Heikkinen, J.P. & Asunta, T. (2009). Influence of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of