Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

the elementary students’ perceptions of mathematical patterns according to presentation forms*

ilköğretim öğrencilerinin sunum biçimlerine göre matematiksel örüntüleri algılayışları

Pages
405–416
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of this study, it was found that there are significant differences between students’ performances according to presentation forms of mathematical pattern in terms of grade levels.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine the performances of elementary 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7th grade level students on mathematical patterns according to presentation forms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The implementation was carried out to 317 students from two elementary schools that were middle socioeconomic level in Ankara city center.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of this study, it was found that there are significant differences between students’ performances according to presentation forms of mathematical pattern in terms of grade levels.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the performances of elementary 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7th grade level students on mathematical patterns according to presentation forms. The implementation was carried out to 317 students from two elementary schools that were middle socioeconomic level in Ankara city center. The data were collected through 12-item test -called as Mathematical Pattern Achievement Test- developed by the researcher. The reliability coefficient was found as 0, 88. As a result of this study, it was found that there are significant differences between students’ performances according to presentation forms of mathematical pattern in terms of grade levels. Students received the highest score from pattern questions presented in the table format in the “Mathematical Pattern Achievement Test”. It was found that the other pattern presentation forms were ranked as respectively “Figural”, “Word Problem” and “Numeric Sequence”.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim 3, 4, 5, 6 ve 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin örüntü sunum biçimlerine göre matematiksel örüntüleri algılayışları ve performanslarının belirlenmesidir. Uygulama Ankara şehir merkezindeki sosyo- ekonomik düzeyi orta seviyede olan iki ilköğretim okulundaki 317 öğrenci üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma verilerinin toplanması için, araştırmacı tarafından “Matematiksel Örüntü Başarı Testi” adı altında 12 soruluk bir test geliştirilmiştir. Geliştirilen testin güvenirlik katsayısı 0,88 olarak bulunmuştur. Araştırma sonucunda öğrencilerin sınıf seviyeleri açısından örüntülerin sunum biçimlerine göre matematiksel örüntüler ile ilgili performansları arasında anlamlı farklılıklar olduğu bulunmuştur. “Matematiksel Örüntü Başarı Testi”nde, öğrenciler en yüksek puanı “Tablo” biçiminde sunulan örüntü sorularında almışlardır. Diğer sunum biçimlerinde de puan sıralamasının “Şekil”, “Sözel Problem” ve “Sayı Dizisi” biçiminde devam ettiği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAN, H., UMAY, A. (2022). the elementary students’ perceptions of mathematical patterns according to presentation forms*. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 405–416. https://ajindex.com/articles/532116

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Burns, M. (2000). About teaching mathematics. Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.
  2. Devlin, K. (1998). Life by The Numbers. Canada: John Wiley ve Sons English, L. & Warren, E. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. Mathematics Teacher. 91, 2, 166-171
  3. Ferrini-Mundy, J., Lappan, G. & Phillips, E. (1997). Experiences with patterning. Teaching Children Mathematics, (3)6, 282- 286. Fouche, K. K. (1997). Algebra for everyone: Start early. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, (2)4, 226-229.
  4. Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (6th edition). USA: Mc Graw Hill, Inc. Jones, L. (1993) Algebra in the primary school. Education, 3-13, June, s. 27-31.
  5. Lannin, J. K. (2002). Developing middle school students’ understanding of recursive and explicit reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA Lannin, J. K. (2003). Developing algebraic reasoning through generalization. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 8(7). 342-348
  6. Ley, A. F. (2005). A cross-sectional investigation of elementary school student’s ability to work with linear generalizing patterns: The impact of format and age on accuracy and strategy choice. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Toronto, Kanada Looney, C. L. (2004). A study of students’ understanding of patterns and functions in grades 3-5.
  7. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Boston, USA MacGregor, M. & Stacey, K. (1995). The effect of different approaches to algebra on students’ perceptions of functional relationships. Mathematics Education Research Journal. Vol. 7, No. 1, 69-85
  8. Martinez, M. & Brizuela, B. M. (2006). A third grader’s way of thinking about linear function tables. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 25, 285-298.
  9. Mottershead. L. (1995). Investigations in Mathematics. Oxford, Basil Blackwell. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM Olkun, S. ve Toluk-Uçar, Z. (2007). İlköğretimde Etkinlik Temelli Matematik Öğretimi. Ankara:
  10. Maya Akademi Orton, A. & Orton, J. (1999). Pattern and the approach to algebra. In A. Orton (Ed.), Pattern in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. s. 104-120. London: Cassel Orton, J., Orton, A. & Roper, T. (1999). Pictorial and Practical Context and the Presentation of Pattern. In A. Orton (Ed.),