Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 2013 - Sayı: 44

Öğretmen ve öğrenci gözünden yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin rollerine bakış

Viewing foreign language teachers' roles through the eyes of teachers and students

Pages
249–261
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings indicate that the same three roles (conductor, shopkeeper, and entertainer) were favored most by both the participating students and teachers though they were ranked differently.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study (both qualitative and quantitative in nature) examines the metaphors students at a university chose to describe the roles of foreign language teachers and compares metaphors chosen by teachers of English at the same university.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A deeper analysis of the primary metaphors chosen by the participants suggests that there is a significant discrepancy between teachers and students perceptions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings indicate that the same three roles (conductor, shopkeeper, and entertainer) were favored most by both the participating students and teachers though they were ranked differently.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study (both qualitative and quantitative in nature) examines the metaphors students at a university chose to describe the roles of foreign language teachers and compares metaphors chosen by teachers of English at the same university. Findings indicate that the same three roles (conductor, shopkeeper, and entertainer) were favored most by both the participating students and teachers though they were ranked differently. A deeper analysis of the primary metaphors chosen by the participants suggests that there is a significant discrepancy between teachers and students perceptions. While students preferred a learner-centered approach, teachers opted for a teacher-centered teaching. Implications for classroom practices indicate that teachers need to pay closer attention to their students needs, difficulties and interests.

Özet

Nitel ve nicel araştırma özelliği taşıyan bu çalışmanın amacı üniversite düzeyindeki bir grup öğrencinin yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin rol tanımlarıyla ilgili olarak seçtikleri metaforları ortaya koymak ve yine aynı ortamda görev yapan İngilizce öğretmenlerinin tercih ettikleri metaforlarla karşılaştırmaktır. Bulgulara göre, her iki katılımcı grubun en fazla tercih ettikleri ilk üç rol tanımı aynı olmakla birlikte (orkestra şefi, bakkal, şaklaban), birinci tercihlerinde farklılık olduğu görülmektedir. Bu metaforların derinlemesine yapılan analizinde, öğrenciler ile öğretmenlerin yabancı dil öğretmeninin rolüne ilişkin algılamalarında önemli bir ayrılık olduğu söylenebilir. Birinci tercihlerine göre öğrenci katılımcılar daha çok öğrenci-odaklı bir yaklaşımı tercih ederken, öğretmen katılımcıların daha fazla öğretmen-odaklı bir öğretim anlayışına sahip oldukları görülmektedir. Bu bulgulara dayanarak, öğretmenlerin, öğrencilerin yabancı dil öğrenirken karşılaştıkları güçlüklere, ilgi ve gereksinimlerine daha fazla eğilmelerinin gerekliliği vurgulanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKTAY, Y. B., VANCI, Ü. O. (2022). Öğretmen ve öğrenci gözünden yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin rollerine bakış. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2013 - Sayı: 44, 249–261. https://ajindex.com/articles/532071

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 749–764. Ben-Peretz, M., Mendelson, N., & Kron, W. (2003). How teachers in different educational contexts view their roles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 277–290. Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 3–31. Britzman, D. P. (1994). Is there a problem with knowing thyself? Toward a poststructuralist view of teacher identity. In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Teachers thinking, teachers knowing: Reflections on literacy and language education (pp. 53–75). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Brown, G. (1975). Microteaching: A programme of teaching skills. London: Methuen. Bullough, R. V., & Stokes, D. K. (1994). Analyzing personal teaching metaphors in preservice teacher education as a means for encouraging professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 197–224. Cameron, L., & Low, G. (1999). Metaphor. Language Teaching, 32, 77-96.
  2. Campbell, J., Smith, D., Boulton-Lewis, G., Brownlee, J., Burnett, P. C., Carrington, S., & Purdie, N. (2001). Students’ perceptions of teaching and learning: The influence of students’ approaches to learning and teachers’ approaches to teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 7, 173–187. Carter, K., & Doyle, W. (1987). Teachers’ knowledge structures and comprehension processes. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking. London: Cassell. Cooper, K., & Olson, M. (1996). The multiple “I’s” of teacher identity. In M. Kompf, D. Dworet, & R. Boak (Eds.), Changing research and practice (pp. 78–89). London: Falmer Press.
  3. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Bridges to learning: Metaphors of teaching, learning and language. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 149–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Exploring ESL teachers’ roles through metaphor analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 341–351. De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2002). Metaphorical conceptualizations of ESL teaching and learning. Language Teaching Research, 6, 95–120. De Leon-Carillo, C. (2007). Filipino pre-service education students’ preconceptions of teacher roles viewed through a metaphorical lens. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 197–217. Doyle, W.