SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Hybrid university: A case study of private-public partnership in Turkey

Hibrid üniversite: Türkiye’de özel-kamu işbirliğine dair bir alan çalışması

Sefer YILMAZ
Pages
464–475
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper, which puts forth the characteristics and advantages of this new hybrid model on the case of Abdullah GUL University (AGU), will present the need for a legal basis on which this kind of hybrid models representing both public and private characteristics will be able to rise and flourish freely.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is an attempt to explore the development of a new hybrid model of a both state-funded and private-supported higher education in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This quality is argued to add significant advantages to those universities enabling them to utilize both the public and private models’ benefits.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper, which puts forth the characteristics and advantages of this new hybrid model on the case of Abdullah GUL University (AGU), will present the need for a legal basis on which this kind of hybrid models representing both public and private characteristics will be able to rise and flourish freely.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study is an attempt to explore the development of a new hybrid model of a both state-funded and private-supported higher education in Turkey. While there have been such kind of structures throughout the world for a long time, this kind of a university being public but at the same time being supported by a philanthropic non-profit organization is quite new in Turkey. This quality is argued to add significant advantages to those universities enabling them to utilize both the public and private models’ benefits. However, there is not yet any specific legislation regulating this kind of models on a statutory basis. This paper, which puts forth the characteristics and advantages of this new hybrid model on the case of Abdullah GUL University (AGU), will present the need for a legal basis on which this kind of hybrid models representing both public and private characteristics will be able to rise and flourish freely.

Özet

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de hem devlet tarafından finanse edilen ve hem de özel sektör tarafından desteklenen hibrid bir yüksek öğretim modelinin gelişimini anlamaya yönelik bir girişimdir. Her ne kadar bu tür yapılar dünyada uzun zamandan beri var olsalar da, bir üniversitenin devlet üniversitesi olup aynı zamanda kar amacı gütmeyen hayırsever örgütler tarafından desteklenmesi, Türkiye’de son derece yeni bir olgu. Bu niteliğin, bu üniversitelere hem kamu hem de özel vakıf) üniversite modellerinin faydalarından yararlanma gibi önemli avantajlar sağlayacağı öne sürülmektedir. Ancak halı hazırda, bu tür yeni modelleri yasal bir zemin üzerinde yapılandıracak özel bir hukuki düzenleme bulunmamaktadır. Bu makale, Abdullah GÜL Üniversitesi (AGU) modelinden yola çıkarak bu yeni hibrid /karma modelin nitelik ve avantajlarını ortaya koyduktan sonra, hem kamu hem de özel nitelikler arz eden bu tür hibrid/karma modellerin ortaya çıkabilmesi ve özgürce gelişimi için yasal bir zemine ihtiyaç bulunduğunu öne sürecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, S. (2022). Hybrid university: A case study of private-public partnership in Turkey. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 464–475. https://ajindex.com/articles/532062

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. AGUF. (2012). Introductory Booklet. Kayseri: Media Maus. Anheier, H. K. & Leat, D. (2006). Creative Philanthropy. London: Routledge. Austin, M. J. (2003). The changing relationship between nonprofit organizations and public social service agencies in the era of welfare reform. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 3281, 97–114.
  2. Bailey, K. D. (1987). Methods of Social Research. New York: free Press.
  3. Ball, S. J. & Junemann, C. (2011). Education Policy and Philanthropy—The Changing Landscape of English Educational Governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(10), 646-661.
  4. Brown, D. J. (1990). Decentralization and school-based management. New York: Falmer Press.
  5. Buckingham, H. (2009). Competition and contracts in the voluntary sector: Exploring the implications for homeless service providers in Southampton. Policy and Politics, 37(2), 235–254.
  6. Fengliang, L. (2012). Financing higher education: lessons from Chin. Irish Educational Studies, 31(2), 191-206.
  7. Gazley, B., & Brudney, J. (2007). The purpose (and perils) of government nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 389–415.
  8. Gothold, S. (1985). Partnership: Buzzword to Bonus. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 15(1), 28-31.
  9. Grigore, L. J. (2004). Public-private partnership in secondary education. MA Dissertation, University of Calgary. Heller, D. E. & Rogers, K. R. (2006). Shifting the burden: Public and private financing of higher education in the united states and implications for Europe. Tertiary Education and Management, 12(2), 91-117.
  10. Independent Sector. (2001). The new nonprofit almanac in brief Facts and figures on the independent sector 2001.
  11. Washington, DC: Author. Jezierski, L. (1990). Neighborhoods and Public-Private Partnerships in Pittsburgh. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26(2), 217-249.
  12. Johnstone, D. B. & Marcucci, P. N. (2010). Financing higher education worldwide: Who pays? Who should pay? Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  13. Kendall, J. & Knapp, M. (1996). The voluntary sector in the United Kingdom. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  14. Lewis, J. (2005). New Labour’s approach to the voluntary sector: Independence and the meaning of partnership. Social Policy and Society, 4(2), 121–131.
  15. Liu, Y. W. (2006). Educational loan, student performance and graduates’ choice. MA Dissertation, Peking University. Neil, W. G. (1983). The local education foundation: A new way to raise money for schools. Reston. VA: National Association of Secondary