SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Jigsaw and Cluster Techniques on Achievement and Attitude in Turkish Written Expression

Jigsaw ve Küme Tekniğinin Yazılı Anlatım Becerilerindeki Başarı ve Tutum üzerine Etkisi

Esin YAĞMUR ŞAHİN
Pages
521–534
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the statistical analysis, a significant difference has been determined between control and experimental groups, in terms of attitude, academic achievement and retention in favor of the jigsaw technique

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the present paper is to assess the effect of the jigsaw and conventional cluster techniques on achievement and attitude in Turkish written expression in primary school.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sampling of this study is composed of 61 8th grade students studying in two different classes of a primary school in Turkey in 2009-2010.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the statistical analysis, a significant difference has been determined between control and experimental groups, in terms of attitude, academic achievement and retention in favor of the jigsaw technique
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to assess the effect of the jigsaw and conventional cluster techniques on achievement and attitude in Turkish written expression in primary school. The sampling of this study is composed of 61 8th grade students studying in two different classes of a primary school in Turkey in 2009-2010. One of the classes has been randomly selected as a control group (N=31) in which the conventional cluster technique is used, while the other is the experimental group (N=30) in which the jigsaw technique is used. The data related to the students' attitudes toward written expression have been collected using an Attitude Scale for Written Expression (ASWE) as a pre-test and a post-test, while their academic achievement in written expression has been evaluated by using the Achievement Test of Written Expression (ATWE), and the results have been analyzed. As a result of the statistical analysis, a significant difference has been determined between control and experimental groups, in terms of attitude, academic achievement and retention in favor of the jigsaw technique

Özet

Bu çalışma, Jigsaw ile geleneksel küme yönteminin ilköğretim Türkçe dersi kapsamında yazılı anlatım becerilerine yönelik akademik başarı ve yazılı anlatıma yönelik tutum üzerindeki etkisini tespit etmek amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmanın örneklemi, 2009-2010 akademik yılında Türkiye'de bir ilköğretim okulunun iki ayrı 8. sınıftaki 61 öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Şubelerden biri geleneksel küme yönteminin uygulandığı kontrol grubu(N=31) diğeri Jigsaw tekniğinin uygulandığı deney grubu(N=30) olarak rastgele belirlenmiştir. Grupların yazılı anlatıma yönelik tutumlarına ait veriler ön test ve son test olarak Yazılı Anlatıma Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği (YAYTÖ) ile yazılı anlatıma yönelik akademik başarıları Yazılı Anlatım Başarı Testi (YABT) toplanmış, sonuçları analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan istatistiki analizler sonucunda, yazılı anlatım konusunun öğretiminde deney ve kontrol grubu arasında tutum, akademik başarı ve kalıcılık yönünden Jigsaw tekniği lehine anlamlı bir farkın olduğu görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, E. Y. (2022). The Effect of Jigsaw and Cluster Techniques on Achievement and Attitude in Turkish Written Expression. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 521–534. https://ajindex.com/articles/532033

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Açıkgöz, K.Ü. (1992). İşbirlikli öğrenme: kuram, araştırma, uygulama. Malatya: Uğurel Matbaası. Açıkgöz, K.Ü. (2006).
  2. Aktif öğrenme, İzmir:
  3. Kanyılmaz Matbaası. Arslan, A. (2012). Sözcük türleri öğretiminde jigsaw tekniğinin etkisi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 1(32),157-168.
  4. Barrett, T. (2005). Effects of cooperative learning on the performance of sixth-grade physical education students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24:88-102.
  5. Cadopi, M. & Winnykamen, F. (2002). Peer tutoring in a physical education setting: influence of tutor skill level on novice learners’ motivation and performance. Journal of Physical Education, 22:105-123.
  6. Cartwright, S. (1993). Cooperative learning can occur in any kind of program. Young Children, 48:12-14.
  7. Condy, J., Chigona, A., Chetty, R. & Thornhill, C. (2010). Final-year teacher training students’ perceptions of THRASS. South African Journal of Education, 30:261-275.
  8. Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü. Şimşek, U. (2005). İşbirlikçi öğrenme yöntemi üzerine derleme: I. işbirlikçi öğrenme yöntemi ve yöntemle ilgili çalışmalar. Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 7(1). Ernst, M. & Byra, M. (1998). Pairing learners in the reciprocal style of teaching influence on student skill, knowledge and socialization. Physical Educator, 55: 24-38.
  9. Gömleksiz, M. (1993). Kubaşık öğrenme yöntemi ile geleneksel yöntemin demokratik tutumlar ve erişiye etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Adana: Çukurova Üniversitesi,
  10. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Graham, D.C. (2005). Cooperative learning methods and middle school students. Ph. D. Thesis, Capella University. Hedeen, T. (2003). The reverse jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31(3): 325-332.
  11. Huang, C.Y. (2000). The effects of cooperative learning and model demonstration strategies on motor skill performance during video instruction. Proceeding National Sciences Council, 2:255-268.
  12. Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1999). What makes cooperative learning work. In Kluge, D. McGuire, S., Johnson, DW, Johnson, RT, (Eds.) Cooperative learning. Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. & Holubec, E.J. (1994). Cooperative learning. in the classroom cooperation in the classroom. Alexandria, Minnesota: Association for supervision and curriculum Development. Johnson, M. & Ward, P. (2001). Effects of classwide peer tutoring on correct performance of strinking skills in 3rd grade physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physi