SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Sözlü iletişim strateji envanterinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları

The validity and reliability studies of the oral communication strategy inventory

Şaziye YAMAN
Pelin IRGIN
Pages
417–427
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results suggested that a listening strategy inventory can be developed to understand listening strategy preferences of Turkish students considering cultural differences.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study can be listed as describing a Turkish version of the Oral Communication Strategy Inventory (OCSI) developed by Nakatani (2006), obtaining evidence of the internal consistency reliabilities of OCSI, and providing evidence for the validity of OCSI in Turkish culture through the use of the factor analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants in this study were 823 Turkish students learning English as a foreign language, studying at high schools and universities in Mersin, Adana, and Hatay in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results suggested that a listening strategy inventory can be developed to understand listening strategy preferences of Turkish students considering cultural differences.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study can be listed as describing a Turkish version of the Oral Communication Strategy Inventory (OCSI) developed by Nakatani (2006), obtaining evidence of the internal consistency reliabilities of OCSI, and providing evidence for the validity of OCSI in Turkish culture through the use of the factor analysis. The participants in this study were 823 Turkish students learning English as a foreign language, studying at high schools and universities in Mersin, Adana, and Hatay in Turkey. The results of the study indicated that OCSI is not a valid and reliable tool in Turkish culture. These results suggested that a listening strategy inventory can be developed to understand listening strategy preferences of Turkish students considering cultural differences.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Nakatani (2006) tarafından geliştirilen Sözel İletişim Stratejileri Envanteri’nin (SİSE) Türkçeye adapte edilmesidir. Ayrıca, bu envanter için faktör analizi kullanılarak SİSE’nin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarının yapılması hedeflenmiştir. Çalışmaya, Türkiye’nin Mersin, Adana, ve Hatay illerindeki üniversite ve liselerden 823 öğrenci katılmıştır. Bulgular SİSE’nin Türk kültüründe geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olmadığını göstermektedir. Aynı zamanda bulgular, Türk öğrencilerinin kültürel farklılıklarını göz önünde bulundurarak dinleme strateji tercihlerini anlamak için dinleme strateji envanteri geliştirilebildiğini belirtmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAMAN, Ş., IRGIN, P. (2022). Sözlü iletişim strateji envanterinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 417–427. https://ajindex.com/articles/531977

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Call, E. (1985). Auditory short term memory, listening comprehension and the Input Hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 765- 781. Chamot, A.U., O’Malley, J. M., Kupper, L., & Impink-Hernandez, M. (1987). A study of learning strategies in foreign language instruction: First year report. InterAmerica Research Associates, Rosslyn, VA. Chamot, A.U. (1993). Student responses to learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 3, 308-321.
  2. Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. New York: Addison Wesley Longman. Cohen, A., & Chi, J. (2002). Language Strategy Use Inventory and Index. CARLA working paper. Minneapolis, MN: Center for advanced research on language acquisition. Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L. & Chi, J. C. (2000). Language strategy use survey. Retrieved September 5, 2005, from http://www.carla.umn.edu/about/profiles/CohenPapers/Lg_Strat_Srvy.html
  3. Chamot, A.U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 13- 24. Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. London: Sage. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (2nd ed.). Pui Mahwah, New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gercek, F. (2000). The Effects of Prep Listening Classes on the Frequency of Listening Comprehension Strategy Use. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Anadolu University, Eskisehir. Goh, C. (1998). How ESL Learners with Different Listening Abilities Use Comprehension Strategies and Tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2, 2, 124-147.
  4. Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor Analysis. United States of America: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 3, 367-383.
  5. Gu, Y., Q, Wen, & Wu, D. (1995). How often is often? Reference ambiguities of the Likert-scale in language learning strategy research. Occasional papers in English language teaching. (Vol. 5, pp. 19–35).
  6. ELT Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong. Hsiao, T-Y., & Oxford, R. (2002). Comparing Theories of Language Learning Strategies: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 368-383.
  7. Jung, E. H. (2003). The Role of Discourse Signalling Clues The Modern Language Journal, 87. in Second Language Listening Comprehension. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Prentice-Hall. Lu, C. (2005). Growth strategies and merger patterns among s