SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 2013 - Sayı: 44

The adaptions study of the Provision of Social Relations scale to Turkish

Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeği'nin Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması

Esra VAR ÇALIK
Veli DUYAN
Selahattin GELBAL
Pages
159–169
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Family support subscale internal consistency of .74, friend support subscale internal consistency of .75 According to the confirmatory factor analysis which is applied for reliability, it was determined that Provision of Social Relations Scale can be accepted as a valid and reliable tool which can be used for primary school secondary degree students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Provision of Social Relationship Scale was developed to measure perception of social support according to provision of social relationship by Turner, Frankel & Levin (1983).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The reliability study of the Provision of Social Relations Scale on 1070 primary school students revealed an internal consistency of Cronbach Alpha .81 and a test-retest reliability coefficient of .85.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Family support subscale internal consistency of .74, friend support subscale internal consistency of .75 According to the confirmatory factor analysis which is applied for reliability, it was determined that Provision of Social Relations Scale can be accepted as a valid and reliable tool which can be used for primary school secondary degree students.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Provision of Social Relationship Scale was developed to measure perception of social support according to provision of social relationship by Turner, Frankel & Levin (1983). The purpose of the present study was conducted to determine the validity and reliability of the Provision of Social Relations Scale in Turkish society. The reliability study of the Provision of Social Relations Scale on 1070 primary school students revealed an internal consistency of Cronbach Alpha .81 and a test-retest reliability coefficient of .85. Family support subscale internal consistency of .74, friend support subscale internal consistency of .75 According to the confirmatory factor analysis which is applied for reliability, it was determined that Provision of Social Relations Scale can be accepted as a valid and reliable tool which can be used for primary school secondary degree students.

Özet

Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeği, bireylerin sosyal destek algılarını sosyal ilişki unsurlarına göre ölçmek amacıyla Turner, Frankel ve Levin (1983) tarafından geliştirilmiştir. Bu çalışma, Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeğinin Türkiye için geçerliğini ve güvenirliğini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeği 1070 ilköğretim öğrencisi üzerinde uygulanmış, Cronbach Alpha değeri .81 ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği ise .85 olarak bulunmuştur. Alt boyutlardan aile desteği için Cronbach Alpha değeri .74, arkadaş desteği alt boyutu için Cronbach Alpha değeri .75 bulunmuştur Geçerlik için yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi Sosyal İlişki Unsurları Ölçeğinin ilköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencileri için geçerli ve güvenilir olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇALIK, E. V., DUYAN, V., GELBAL, S. (2022). The adaptions study of the Provision of Social Relations scale to Turkish. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2013 - Sayı: 44, 159–169. https://ajindex.com/articles/531956

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Alptekin, K. Ve Duyan V. (2009). İntihar ve İntiharı Önleme. İstanbul:
  2. Yeni İnsan Yayınevi.
  3. Anderson, J.C.,. & Gerbing D.W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of- fit indices for maximum likelihood comfirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
  4. Barrerra, M. (1986). Distinction between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413-445.
  5. Bates, D. S., & Toro, P. (1999). Developing measures to assess social support among homeless and poor people. Journal of Community Psychology, 27 (2), 137-156.
  6. Burke, R. J. & Weir, T. (1978). Benefits to adolescents of informal helping relationships with their parents and peers. Psychological Reports, 42, 1175- 1184. Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom. Med. 38, 300-314.
  7. Cohen, S., Underwood, L. & Gottlieb, B. (2000). Social support measurement and intervention a guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press Cole, D.A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.
  8. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010).Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara:
  9. Pegem Akademi Yayınevi Davidson, L. M. (2008). United states and finnish adolescents perceptıon of social support, School Psychology international, 2(3), 363–375. Dilli D, Dallar Y, Çakır İ. (2010). Psychological characteristics of adolescent suicide attempters presenting to a pediatric emergency service. Turk J Med Sci, 40(3): 377-390.
  10. Fischer, J., ve Corcoran, K. (1994). Measures for clinical practice: A sourcebook (Vol.2). New York: The Free Press.
  11. Frey, C & Riithlisberger C. (1996) Social support in healthy adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25 (1) 17-31
  12. Geçtan, E. (2007). İnsan olmak, (6. Basım). İstanbul:
  13. Metis Yayıncılık Greenberg, T., Siegel, J. & Leitch, C. (1983). The nature and importance of attachment relationships to parents and peers during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 373-386.
  14. Grover KE, Green KL, Pettit JW, Monteith LL, Garza MJ, Venta A. (2009). Problem solving moderates the effects of life event stress and chronic stress on suicidal behaviors in adolescence. J Clin Psychol., 65(12):1281-90.
  15. Hoffman, M., Ushpiz, V. & Shif, R (1988) Social support and self-esteem in adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence 17