SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

Turkish Version of Student Academic Support Scale: The Study of Validity and Reliability

Öğrenci Akademik Destek Ölçeği Türkçe Formu: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Serhat ARSLAN
Ahmet AKIN
Pages
1–7
Publication Date
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus Student Academic Support Scale can be used as a valid and reliable instrument in education

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this research is to adapt the Student Academic Support Scale (Mazer & Thompson, 2011) to Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was conducted on 550 university students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus Student Academic Support Scale can be used as a valid and reliable instrument in education
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this research is to adapt the Student Academic Support Scale (Mazer & Thompson, 2011) to Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties. The research was conducted on 550 university students. Results of confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that this scale yielded 4 factors, as original form and that the model was well fit (x2= 246.07, df= 80, RMSEA= .083, CFI= .99, IFI= .99, GFI= .94, AGFI= .91, SRMR= .044). Internal consistency coefficients of subscales varied between .81-.91 and test-retest reliability coefficients varied between .77-.83. Corrected item-total correlations ranged .50 to .75. Thus Student Academic Support Scale can be used as a valid and reliable instrument in education

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Öğrenci Akademik Destek Ölçeği'nin (ÖADÖ, Mazer ve Thompson, 2011) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliğini incelemektir. Araştırma 550 (Kadın: 290, Erkek: 260) üniversite öğrencisi üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Dilsel eşdeğerlik çalışmasında, Türkçe ve orijinal formlarında bulunan maddeler arasındaki korelasyon katsayılarının .78 ile .96 arasında değiştiği bulunmuştur. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizinde dört boyutlu modelin iyi uyum verdiği görülmüştür (x2= 246.07, sd= 80, RMSEA= .083, CFI= .99, IFI= .99, GFI= .94, AGFI= .91, SRMR= .044). Ölçeğin madde toplam korelasyon katsayıları .50 ile .75 arasında sıralanmaktadır. ÖADÖ'nün iç tutarlılık güvenirlik katsayıları bilgi desteği alt boyutu için .82, saygı desteği alt boyutu için .91, motivasyon desteği alt boyutu için .81, rahatlatma desteği alt boyutu için .84 olarak bulunmuştur. Test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayıları .77 ile .83 arasında bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlar ÖADÖ'nün Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğunu göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, S., AKIN, A. (2022). Turkish Version of Student Academic Support Scale: The Study of Validity and Reliability. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/531911

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Alfaro, C. A., Umana-Talor, J. A., & Bamaca, Y.M. (2006). The influence of academic support on latino adolescents’ academic motivation. Family Relations, 55, 279–291.
  2. Braithwaite, D. O., McBride, M. C., & Schrodt, P. (2003). Parent teams and the everyday interactions of co-parenting in stepfamilies. Communication Reports, 16 (2), 93-111.
  3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:
  4. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Chen, J. L. J. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents’ academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77–127.
  5. Clark-Unite, C. (2007). A critique of supplemental instruction programme. A case study at the University of Port Elizabeth (1993-2005).
  6. Unpublished thesis, University of Port Elizabeth. De Berard, M. S., Spielmans, G. I., & Julka, D C. (2004). Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: A longitudinal study. College Student Journal, 38(1), 66-80.
  7. Elliott, J. (2007). Providing academic support for teachers and students in high stakes learning environments. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 23(2), 87-107.
  8. Forman, E. (1988). The effects of social support and school placement on the self-concept of LD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11(2), 115–124
  9. Giddan, N. S. (1988). Community and social support for college students. Springfield, IL: C. C.Thomas. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
  10. Jones, A. C. (2008). The effects of out-of-class support on student satisfaction and motivation to learn. Communication Education, 57(3), 373-388.
  11. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. Kenny, M. E., & Rice, K. G. (1995). Attachment to parents and adjustments in late adolescent college students: Current status, applications, and future considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 23(3), 433-456.
  12. Keup, J. R., & Mullins, E. (2010). Findings from national survey of peer leadership experinces and outcomes. Concurent session presented at the 29th Annual Conference on The First-Year Experince, Denver, February. Kloomok, S., & Cosden, M. (1994). Self-concept in children with learning disabilities: The relationship between global self-concept, academic “discounting,” non